development/git
development/git
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git synced 2024-07-17 11:07:55 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 9 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

branch: clean up commit flags after merge-filter walk

Browse source 
When we run `branch --merged`, we use prepare_revision_walk
with the merge-filter marked as UNINTERESTING. Any branch
tips that are marked UNINTERESTING after it returns must be
ancestors of that commit. As we iterate through the list of
refs to show, we check item->commit->object.flags to see
whether it was marked.

This interacts badly with --verbose, which will do a
separate walk to find the ahead/behind information for each
branch. There are two bad things that can happen:

  1. The ahead/behind walk may get the wrong results,
     because it can see a bogus UNINTERESTING flag leftover
     from the merge-filter walk.

  2. We may omit some branches if their tips are involved in
     the ahead/behind traversal of a branch shown earlier.
     The ahead/behind walk carefully cleans up its commit
     flags, meaning it may also erase the UNINTERESTING
     flag that we expect to check later.

We can solve this by moving the merge-filter state for each
ref into its "struct ref_item" as soon as we finish the
merge-filter walk. That fixes (2). Then we are free to clear
the commit flags we used in the walk, fixing (1).

Note that we actually do away with the matches_merge_filter
helper entirely here, and inline it between the revision
walk and the flag-clearing. This ensures that nobody
accidentally calls it at the wrong time (it is only safe to
check in that instant between the setting and clearing of
the global flag).

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jeff King 2014-09-18 06:49:43 -04:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent 30d45f798d
commit 8376a70441
2 changed files with 48 additions and 14 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

33
builtin/branch.c
View file

@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ struct ref_item {
char *dest;
unsigned int kind, width;
struct commit *commit;
int ignore;
};
struct ref_list {
@ -385,6 +386,7 @@ static int append_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flags,
newitem->commit = commit;
newitem->width = utf8_strwidth(refname);
newitem->dest = resolve_symref(orig_refname, prefix);
newitem->ignore = 0;
/* adjust for "remotes/" */
if (newitem->kind == REF_REMOTE_BRANCH &&
ref_list->kinds != REF_REMOTE_BRANCH)
@ -484,17 +486,6 @@ static void fill_tracking_info(struct strbuf *stat, const char *branch_name,
free(ref);
}
static int matches_merge_filter(struct commit *commit)
{
int is_merged;
if (merge_filter == NO_FILTER)
return 1;
is_merged = !!(commit->object.flags & UNINTERESTING);
return (is_merged == (merge_filter == SHOW_MERGED));
}
static void add_verbose_info(struct strbuf *out, struct ref_item *item,
int verbose, int abbrev)
{
@ -522,10 +513,9 @@ static void print_ref_item(struct ref_item *item, int maxwidth, int verbose,
{
char c;
int color;
struct commit *commit = item->commit;
struct strbuf out = STRBUF_INIT, name = STRBUF_INIT;
if (!matches_merge_filter(commit))
if (item->ignore)
return;
switch (item->kind) {
@ -575,7 +565,7 @@ static int calc_maxwidth(struct ref_list *refs)
{
int i, w = 0;
for (i = 0; i < refs->index; i++) {
if (!matches_merge_filter(refs->list[i].commit))
if (refs->list[i].ignore)
continue;
if (refs->list[i].width > w)
w = refs->list[i].width;
@ -618,6 +608,7 @@ static void show_detached(struct ref_list *ref_list)
item.kind = REF_LOCAL_BRANCH;
item.dest = NULL;
item.commit = head_commit;
item.ignore = 0;
if (item.width > ref_list->maxwidth)
ref_list->maxwidth = item.width;
print_ref_item(&item, ref_list->maxwidth, ref_list->verbose, ref_list->abbrev, 1, "");
@ -656,6 +647,20 @@ static int print_ref_list(int kinds, int detached, int verbose, int abbrev, stru
if (prepare_revision_walk(&ref_list.revs))
die(_("revision walk setup failed"));
for (i = 0; i < ref_list.index; i++) {
struct ref_item *item = &ref_list.list[i];
struct commit *commit = item->commit;
int is_merged = !!(commit->object.flags & UNINTERESTING);
item->ignore = is_merged != (merge_filter == SHOW_MERGED);
}
for (i = 0; i < ref_list.index; i++) {
struct ref_item *item = &ref_list.list[i];
clear_commit_marks(item->commit, ALL_REV_FLAGS);
}
clear_commit_marks(filter, ALL_REV_FLAGS);
if (verbose)
ref_list.maxwidth = calc_maxwidth(&ref_list);
}

29
t/t3201-branch-contains.sh
View file

@ -130,4 +130,33 @@ test_expect_success 'implicit --list conflicts with modification options' '
'
# We want to set up a case where the walk for the tracking info
# of one branch crosses the tip of another branch (and make sure
# that the latter walk does not mess up our flag to see if it was
# merged).
#
# Here "topic" tracks "master" with one extra commit, and "zzz" points to the
# same tip as master The name "zzz" must come alphabetically after "topic"
# as we process them in that order.
test_expect_success 'branch --merged with --verbose' '
git branch --track topic master &&
git branch zzz topic &&
git checkout topic &&
test_commit foo &&
git branch --merged topic >actual &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
master
* topic
zzz
EOF
test_cmp expect actual &&
git branch --verbose --merged topic >actual &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
master c77a0a9 second on master
* topic 2c939f4 [ahead 1] foo
zzz c77a0a9 second on master
EOF
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_done