From 6c8647da5c84bac9039135652ce5e4beb763e5be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Elijah Newren Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 12:20:00 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] merge-recursive: fix logic ordering issue merge_trees() did a variety of work, including: * Calling get_unmerged() to get unmerged entries * Calling record_df_conflict_files() with all unmerged entries to do some work to ensure we could handle D/F conflicts correctly * Calling get_renames() to check for renames. An easily overlooked issue is that get_renames() can create more unmerged entries and add them to the list, which have the possibility of being involved in D/F conflicts. So the call to record_df_conflict_files() should really be moved after all the rename detection. I didn't come up with any testcases demonstrating any bugs with the old ordering, but I suspect there were some for both normal renames and for directory renames. Fix the ordering. Reviewed-By: Stefan Beller Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- merge-recursive.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/merge-recursive.c b/merge-recursive.c index 0fc580d8ca..306db8eaf5 100644 --- a/merge-recursive.c +++ b/merge-recursive.c @@ -1989,10 +1989,10 @@ int merge_trees(struct merge_options *o, get_files_dirs(o, merge); entries = get_unmerged(); - record_df_conflict_files(o, entries); re_head = get_renames(o, head, common, head, merge, entries); re_merge = get_renames(o, merge, common, head, merge, entries); clean = process_renames(o, re_head, re_merge); + record_df_conflict_files(o, entries); if (clean < 0) goto cleanup; for (i = entries->nr-1; 0 <= i; i--) {