manpages: italicize gitk's name (where it was in teletype font)

The name `gitk` is sometimes meant to be entered at the command
prompt, but most uses are just referring to the program with that
name (not the incantation to start it).

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Nieder 2008-07-03 00:49:55 -05:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent ba020ef5eb
commit 42d36bb841
4 changed files with 5 additions and 5 deletions

View file

@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ During the bisection process, you can say
$ git bisect visualize
------------
to see the currently remaining suspects in `gitk`. `visualize` is a bit
to see the currently remaining suspects in 'gitk'. `visualize` is a bit
too long to type and `view` is provided as a synonym.
If 'DISPLAY' environment variable is not set, 'git-log' is used

View file

@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ on allowing users to make changes to their repository by making
new commits, amending existing ones, creating branches, performing
local merges, and fetching/pushing to remote repositories.
Unlike `gitk`, 'git-gui' focuses on commit generation
Unlike 'gitk', 'git-gui' focuses on commit generation
and single file annotation and does not show project history.
It does however supply menu actions to start a `gitk` session from
It does however supply menu actions to start a 'gitk' session from
within 'git-gui'.
'git-gui' is known to work on all popular UNIX systems, Mac OS X,

View file

@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ means: normally it will just show you your current `HEAD`) and their
histories. You can also see exactly how they came to be from a common
source.
Anyway, let's exit `gitk` (`^Q` or the File menu), and decide that we want
Anyway, let's exit 'gitk' (`^Q` or the File menu), and decide that we want
to merge the work we did on the `mybranch` branch into the `master`
branch (which is currently our `HEAD` too). To do that, there's a nice
script called 'git-merge', which wants to know which branches you want

View file

@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ then merged back together, the order in which 'git-log' presents
those commits is meaningless.
Most projects with multiple contributors (such as the linux kernel,
or git itself) have frequent merges, and `gitk` does a better job of
or git itself) have frequent merges, and 'gitk' does a better job of
visualizing their history. For example,
-------------------------------------