Remove git-resolve.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This commit is contained in:
Junio C Hamano 2007-02-07 10:37:03 -08:00
parent 07fef5fc15
commit 207dfa0791
11 changed files with 14 additions and 59 deletions

1
.gitignore vendored
View file

@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ git-repo-config
git-request-pull
git-rerere
git-reset
git-resolve
git-rev-list
git-rev-parse
git-revert

View file

@ -149,7 +149,6 @@ sub format_one {
git-request-pull foreignscminterface
git-rerere ancillaryinterrogators
git-reset mainporcelain
git-resolve mainporcelain
git-revert mainporcelain
git-rev-list plumbinginterrogators
git-rev-parse ancillaryinterrogators

View file

@ -587,4 +587,5 @@ stages to temporary files and calls a "merge" script on it:
git-merge-index git-merge-one-file hello.c
and that is what higher level `git resolve` is implemented with.
and that is what higher level `git merge -s resolve` is implemented
with.

View file

@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ see more complex cases.
Now, let's pretend you are the one who did all the work in
`mybranch`, and the fruit of your hard work has finally been merged
to the `master` branch. Let's go back to `mybranch`, and run
resolve to get the "upstream changes" back to your branch.
`git merge` to get the "upstream changes" back to your branch.
------------
$ git checkout mybranch
@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ Fast forward
----------------
Because your branch did not contain anything more than what are
already merged into the `master` branch, the resolve operation did
already merged into the `master` branch, the merge operation did
not actually do a merge. Instead, it just updated the top of
the tree of your branch to that of the `master` branch. This is
often called 'fast forward' merge.
@ -1099,11 +1099,11 @@ programs, which are 'commit walkers'; they outlived their
usefulness when git Native and SSH transports were introduced,
and not used by `git pull` or `git push` scripts.
Once you fetch from the remote repository, you `resolve` that
Once you fetch from the remote repository, you `merge` that
with your current branch.
However -- it's such a common thing to `fetch` and then
immediately `resolve`, that it's called `git pull`, and you can
immediately `merge`, that it's called `git pull`, and you can
simply do
----------------

View file

@ -1,38 +0,0 @@
git-resolve(1)
==============
NAME
----
git-resolve - Merge two commits
SYNOPSIS
--------
'git-resolve' <current> <merged> <message>
DESCRIPTION
-----------
DEPRECATED and will be removed in 1.5.1. Use `git-merge` instead.
Given two commits and a merge message, merge the <merged> commit
into <current> commit, with the commit log message <message>.
When <current> is a descendant of <merged>, or <current> is an
ancestor of <merged>, no new commit is created and the <message>
is ignored. The former is informally called "already up to
date", and the latter is often called "fast forward".
Author
------
Written by Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> and
Dan Holmsand <holmsand@gmail.com>.
Documentation
--------------
Documentation by David Greaves, Junio C Hamano and the git-list <git@vger.kernel.org>.
GIT
---
Part of the gitlink:git[7] suite

View file

@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ Fortunately I did not have to; what I have in the current branch
------------------------------------------------
$ git checkout master
$ git resolve master revert-c99 fast ;# this should be a fast forward
$ git merge revert-c99 ;# this should be a fast forward
Updating from 10d781b9caa4f71495c7b34963bef137216f86a8 to e3a693c...
cache.h | 8 ++++----
commit.c | 2 +-
@ -95,13 +95,6 @@ Updating from 10d781b9caa4f71495c7b34963bef137216f86a8 to e3a693c...
5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
------------------------------------------------
The 'fast' in the above 'git resolve' is not a magic. I knew this
'resolve' would result in a fast forward merge, and if not, there is
something very wrong (so I would do 'git reset' on the 'master' branch
and examine the situation). When a fast forward merge is done, the
message parameter to 'git resolve' is discarded, because no new commit
is created. You could have said 'junk' or 'nothing' there as well.
There is no need to redo the test at this point. We fast forwarded
and we know 'master' matches 'revert-c99' exactly. In fact:

View file

@ -2755,7 +2755,7 @@ stages to temporary files and calls a "merge" script on it:
$ git-merge-index git-merge-one-file hello.c
-------------------------------------------------
and that is what higher level `git resolve` is implemented with.
and that is what higher level `git merge -s resolve` is implemented with.
How git stores objects efficiently: pack files
----------------------------------------------

View file

@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ SCRIPT_SH = \
git-merge-one-file.sh git-parse-remote.sh \
git-pull.sh git-rebase.sh \
git-repack.sh git-request-pull.sh git-reset.sh \
git-resolve.sh git-revert.sh git-sh-setup.sh \
git-revert.sh git-sh-setup.sh \
git-tag.sh git-verify-tag.sh \
git-applymbox.sh git-applypatch.sh git-am.sh \
git-merge.sh git-merge-stupid.sh git-merge-octopus.sh \

View file

@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ __git_commands ()
reflog) : plumbing;;
repo-config) : plumbing;;
rerere) : plumbing;;
resolve) : dead dont use;;
rev-list) : plumbing;;
rev-parse) : plumbing;;
runstatus) : plumbing;;

View file

@ -101,7 +101,9 @@ echo "Play, play, play" >>hello
echo "Lots of fun" >>example
git commit -m 'Some fun.' -i hello example
test_expect_failure 'git resolve now fails' 'git resolve HEAD mybranch "Merge work in mybranch"'
test_expect_failure 'git resolve now fails' '
git merge -m "Merge work in mybranch" mybranch
'
cat > hello << EOF
Hello World
@ -134,8 +136,8 @@ Updating from VARIABLE to VARIABLE
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
EOF
git resolve HEAD master "Merge upstream changes." | \
sed -e "1s/[0-9a-f]\{40\}/VARIABLE/g" > resolve.output
git merge -s "Merge upstream changes." master | \
sed -e "1s/[0-9a-f]\{40\}/VARIABLE/g" >resolve.output
test_expect_success 'git resolve' 'cmp resolve.expect resolve.output'
cat > show-branch2.expect << EOF