git/progress.h

#ifndef PROGRESS_H
#define PROGRESS_H

struct progress;

void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, uint64_t total);
int display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n);
struct progress *start_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total);
struct progress *start_delayed_progress(const char *title, uint64_t total);
void stop_progress(struct progress **progress);
void stop_progress_msg(struct progress **progress, const char *msg);

#endif
Make macros to prevent double-inclusion in headers consistent. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> 2007-04-29 06:38:52 +00:00			`#ifndef PROGRESS_H`
			`#define PROGRESS_H`
common progress display support Instead of having this code duplicated in multiple places, let's have a common interface for progress display. If someday someone wishes to display a cheezy progress bar instead then only one file will have to be changed. Note: I left merge-recursive.c out since it has a strange notion of progress as it apparently increase the expected total number as it goes. Someone with more intimate knowledge of what that is supposed to mean might look at converting it to the common progress interface. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> 2007-04-18 18:27:45 +00:00
make struct progress an opaque type This allows for better management of progress "object" existence, as well as making the progress display implementation more independent from its callers. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 2007-10-30 18:57:32 +00:00			`struct progress;`
common progress display support Instead of having this code duplicated in multiple places, let's have a common interface for progress display. If someday someone wishes to display a cheezy progress bar instead then only one file will have to be changed. Note: I left merge-recursive.c out since it has a strange notion of progress as it apparently increase the expected total number as it goes. Someone with more intimate knowledge of what that is supposed to mean might look at converting it to the common progress interface. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> 2007-04-18 18:27:45 +00:00
progress: fix progress meters when dealing with lots of work The possibility of setting merge.renameLimit beyond 2^16 raises the possibility that the values passed to progress can exceed 2^32. Use uint64_t, because it "ought to be enough for anybody". :-) Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 2017-11-13 20:15:58 +00:00			`void display_throughput(struct progress *progress, uint64_t total);`
			`int display_progress(struct progress *progress, uint64_t n);`
			`struct progress start_progress(const char title, uint64_t total);`
			`struct progress start_delayed_progress(const char title, uint64_t total);`
make struct progress an opaque type This allows for better management of progress "object" existence, as well as making the progress display implementation more independent from its callers. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 2007-10-30 18:57:32 +00:00			`void stop_progress(struct progress **progress);`
nicer display of thin pack completion In the same spirit of prettifying Git's output display for mere mortals, here's a simple extension to the progress API allowing for a final message to be provided when terminating a progress line, and use it for the display of the number of objects needed to complete a thin pack, saving yet one more line of screen display. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 2007-11-08 20:45:41 +00:00			`void stop_progress_msg(struct progress *progress, const char msg);`
common progress display support Instead of having this code duplicated in multiple places, let's have a common interface for progress display. If someday someone wishes to display a cheezy progress bar instead then only one file will have to be changed. Note: I left merge-recursive.c out since it has a strange notion of progress as it apparently increase the expected total number as it goes. Someone with more intimate knowledge of what that is supposed to mean might look at converting it to the common progress interface. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net> 2007-04-18 18:27:45 +00:00
			`#endif`