git/t/t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output.sh

207 lines
5.9 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2009 Mark Rada
#
test_description='gitweb as standalone script (parsing script output).
This test runs gitweb (git web interface) as a CGI script from the
commandline, and checks that it produces the correct output, either
in the HTTP header or the actual script output.'
. ./gitweb-lib.sh
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# snapshot file name and prefix
cat >>gitweb_config.perl <<\EOF
$known_snapshot_formats{'tar'} = {
'display' => 'tar',
'type' => 'application/x-tar',
'suffix' => '.tar',
'format' => 'tar',
};
$feature{'snapshot'}{'default'} = ['tar'];
EOF
# Call check_snapshot with the arguments "<basename> [<prefix>]"
#
# This will check that gitweb HTTP header contains proposed filename
# as <basename> with '.tar' suffix added, and that generated tarfile
# (gitweb message body) has <prefix> as prefix for al files in tarfile
#
# <prefix> default to <basename>
check_snapshot () {
basename=$1
prefix=${2:-"$1"}
echo "basename=$basename"
grep "filename=.*$basename.tar" gitweb.headers >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
"$TAR" tf gitweb.body >file_list &&
! grep -v -e "^$prefix$" -e "^$prefix/" -e "^pax_global_header$" file_list
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
}
test_expect_success setup '
test_commit first foo &&
git branch xx/test &&
FULL_ID=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
SHORT_ID=$(git rev-parse --verify --short=7 HEAD)
'
test_debug '
echo "FULL_ID = $FULL_ID"
echo "SHORT_ID = $SHORT_ID"
'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: full sha1' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=$FULL_ID;sf=tar" &&
2009-11-07 15:13:29 +00:00
check_snapshot ".git-$SHORT_ID"
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: shortened sha1' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=$SHORT_ID;sf=tar" &&
2009-11-07 15:13:29 +00:00
check_snapshot ".git-$SHORT_ID"
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: almost full sha1' '
ID=$(git rev-parse --short=30 HEAD) &&
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=$ID;sf=tar" &&
check_snapshot ".git-$SHORT_ID"
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: HEAD' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=HEAD;sf=tar" &&
2009-11-07 15:13:29 +00:00
check_snapshot ".git-HEAD-$SHORT_ID"
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: short branch name (master)' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=master;sf=tar" &&
2009-11-07 15:13:29 +00:00
ID=$(git rev-parse --verify --short=7 master) &&
check_snapshot ".git-master-$ID"
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: short tag name (first)' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=first;sf=tar" &&
ID=$(git rev-parse --verify --short=7 first) &&
check_snapshot ".git-first-$ID"
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: full branch name (refs/heads/master)' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/heads/master;sf=tar" &&
ID=$(git rev-parse --verify --short=7 master) &&
check_snapshot ".git-master-$ID"
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
test_expect_success 'snapshot: full tag name (refs/tags/first)' '
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=refs/tags/first;sf=tar" &&
check_snapshot ".git-first"
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers && cat file_list'
2009-11-07 15:13:29 +00:00
test_expect_success 'snapshot: hierarchical branch name (xx/test)' '
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
gitweb_run "p=.git;a=snapshot;h=xx/test;sf=tar" &&
! grep "filename=.*/" gitweb.headers
'
test_debug 'cat gitweb.headers'
gitweb: Restructure projects list generation Extract filtering out forks (which is done if 'forks' feature is enabled) into filter_forks_from_projects_list subroutine, and searching projects (via projects search form, or via content tags) into search_projects_list subroutine. Both are now run _before_ displaying projects, and not while printing; this allow to know upfront if there were any found projects. Gitweb now can and do print 'No such projects found' if user searches for phrase which does not correspond to any project (any repository). This also would allow splitting projects list into pages, if we so desire. Filtering out forks and marking repository (project) as having forks is now consolidated into one subroutine (special case of handling forks in git_get_projects_list only for $projects_list being file is now removed). Forks handling is also cleaned up and simplified. $pr->{'forks'} now contains un-filled list of forks; we can now also detect situation where the way for having forks is prepared, but there are no forks yet. Sorting projects got also refactored in a very straight way (just moving code) into sort_projects_list subroutine. The interaction between forks, content tags and searching is now made more explicit: searching whether by tag, or via search form turns off fork filtering (gitweb searches also forks, and will show all results). If 'ctags' feature is disabled, then searching by tag is too. The t9500 test now includes some basic test for 'forks' and 'ctags' features; the t9502 includes test checking if gitweb correctly filters out forks. Generating list of projects by scanning given directory is now also a bit simplified wrt. handling filtering; it is byproduct of extracting filtering forks to separate subroutine. While at it we now detect that there are no projects and respond with "404 No projects found" also for 'project_index' and 'opml' actions. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29 17:51:56 +00:00
# ----------------------------------------------------------------------
# forks of projects
test_expect_success 'forks: setup' '
git init --bare foo.git &&
echo file > file &&
git --git-dir=foo.git --work-tree=. add file &&
git --git-dir=foo.git --work-tree=. commit -m "Initial commit" &&
echo "foo" > foo.git/description &&
git clone --bare foo.git foo.bar.git &&
echo "foo.bar" > foo.bar.git/description &&
git clone --bare foo.git foo_baz.git &&
echo "foo_baz" > foo_baz.git/description &&
rm -fr foo &&
mkdir -p foo &&
(
cd foo &&
git clone --shared --bare ../foo.git foo-forked.git &&
echo "fork of foo" > foo-forked.git/description
)
'
test_expect_success 'forks: not skipped unless "forks" feature enabled' '
gitweb_run "a=project_list" &&
grep -q ">\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo_baz\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo\\.bar\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo_baz\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo/foo-forked\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">fork of .*<" gitweb.body
'
test_expect_success 'enable forks feature' '
cat >>gitweb_config.perl <<-\EOF
$feature{"forks"}{"default"} = [1];
EOF
'
gitweb: Restructure projects list generation Extract filtering out forks (which is done if 'forks' feature is enabled) into filter_forks_from_projects_list subroutine, and searching projects (via projects search form, or via content tags) into search_projects_list subroutine. Both are now run _before_ displaying projects, and not while printing; this allow to know upfront if there were any found projects. Gitweb now can and do print 'No such projects found' if user searches for phrase which does not correspond to any project (any repository). This also would allow splitting projects list into pages, if we so desire. Filtering out forks and marking repository (project) as having forks is now consolidated into one subroutine (special case of handling forks in git_get_projects_list only for $projects_list being file is now removed). Forks handling is also cleaned up and simplified. $pr->{'forks'} now contains un-filled list of forks; we can now also detect situation where the way for having forks is prepared, but there are no forks yet. Sorting projects got also refactored in a very straight way (just moving code) into sort_projects_list subroutine. The interaction between forks, content tags and searching is now made more explicit: searching whether by tag, or via search form turns off fork filtering (gitweb searches also forks, and will show all results). If 'ctags' feature is disabled, then searching by tag is too. The t9500 test now includes some basic test for 'forks' and 'ctags' features; the t9502 includes test checking if gitweb correctly filters out forks. Generating list of projects by scanning given directory is now also a bit simplified wrt. handling filtering; it is byproduct of extracting filtering forks to separate subroutine. While at it we now detect that there are no projects and respond with "404 No projects found" also for 'project_index' and 'opml' actions. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29 17:51:56 +00:00
test_expect_success 'forks: forks skipped if "forks" feature enabled' '
gitweb_run "a=project_list" &&
grep -q ">\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo_baz\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo\\.bar\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">foo_baz\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -v ">foo/foo-forked\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -v ">fork of .*<" gitweb.body
'
test_expect_success 'forks: "forks" action for forked repository' '
gitweb_run "p=foo.git;a=forks" &&
grep -q ">foo/foo-forked\\.git<" gitweb.body &&
grep -q ">fork of foo<" gitweb.body
'
test_expect_success 'forks: can access forked repository' '
gitweb_run "p=foo/foo-forked.git;a=summary" &&
grep -q "200 OK" gitweb.headers &&
grep -q ">fork of foo<" gitweb.body
'
test_expect_success 'forks: project_index lists all projects (incl. forks)' '
cat >expected <<-\EOF &&
gitweb: Restructure projects list generation Extract filtering out forks (which is done if 'forks' feature is enabled) into filter_forks_from_projects_list subroutine, and searching projects (via projects search form, or via content tags) into search_projects_list subroutine. Both are now run _before_ displaying projects, and not while printing; this allow to know upfront if there were any found projects. Gitweb now can and do print 'No such projects found' if user searches for phrase which does not correspond to any project (any repository). This also would allow splitting projects list into pages, if we so desire. Filtering out forks and marking repository (project) as having forks is now consolidated into one subroutine (special case of handling forks in git_get_projects_list only for $projects_list being file is now removed). Forks handling is also cleaned up and simplified. $pr->{'forks'} now contains un-filled list of forks; we can now also detect situation where the way for having forks is prepared, but there are no forks yet. Sorting projects got also refactored in a very straight way (just moving code) into sort_projects_list subroutine. The interaction between forks, content tags and searching is now made more explicit: searching whether by tag, or via search form turns off fork filtering (gitweb searches also forks, and will show all results). If 'ctags' feature is disabled, then searching by tag is too. The t9500 test now includes some basic test for 'forks' and 'ctags' features; the t9502 includes test checking if gitweb correctly filters out forks. Generating list of projects by scanning given directory is now also a bit simplified wrt. handling filtering; it is byproduct of extracting filtering forks to separate subroutine. While at it we now detect that there are no projects and respond with "404 No projects found" also for 'project_index' and 'opml' actions. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29 17:51:56 +00:00
.git
foo.bar.git
foo.git
foo/foo-forked.git
foo_baz.git
EOF
gitweb_run "a=project_index" &&
sed -e "s/ .*//" <gitweb.body | sort >actual &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
xss() {
echo >&2 "Checking $1..." &&
gitweb_run "$1" &&
if grep "$TAG" gitweb.body; then
echo >&2 "xss: $TAG should have been quoted in output"
return 1
fi
return 0
}
test_expect_success 'xss checks' '
TAG="<magic-xss-tag>" &&
xss "a=rss&p=$TAG" &&
xss "a=rss&p=foo.git&f=$TAG"
'
gitweb: Restructure projects list generation Extract filtering out forks (which is done if 'forks' feature is enabled) into filter_forks_from_projects_list subroutine, and searching projects (via projects search form, or via content tags) into search_projects_list subroutine. Both are now run _before_ displaying projects, and not while printing; this allow to know upfront if there were any found projects. Gitweb now can and do print 'No such projects found' if user searches for phrase which does not correspond to any project (any repository). This also would allow splitting projects list into pages, if we so desire. Filtering out forks and marking repository (project) as having forks is now consolidated into one subroutine (special case of handling forks in git_get_projects_list only for $projects_list being file is now removed). Forks handling is also cleaned up and simplified. $pr->{'forks'} now contains un-filled list of forks; we can now also detect situation where the way for having forks is prepared, but there are no forks yet. Sorting projects got also refactored in a very straight way (just moving code) into sort_projects_list subroutine. The interaction between forks, content tags and searching is now made more explicit: searching whether by tag, or via search form turns off fork filtering (gitweb searches also forks, and will show all results). If 'ctags' feature is disabled, then searching by tag is too. The t9500 test now includes some basic test for 'forks' and 'ctags' features; the t9502 includes test checking if gitweb correctly filters out forks. Generating list of projects by scanning given directory is now also a bit simplified wrt. handling filtering; it is byproduct of extracting filtering forks to separate subroutine. While at it we now detect that there are no projects and respond with "404 No projects found" also for 'project_index' and 'opml' actions. Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-29 17:51:56 +00:00
gitweb: Document current snapshot rules via new tests Add t9502-gitweb-standalone-parse-output test script, which runs gitweb as a CGI script from the commandline and checks that it produces the correct output. Currently this test script contains only tests of snapshot naming (proposed name of snapshot file) and snapshot prefix (prefix of files in the archive / snapshot). It defines and uses 'tar' snapshot format, without compression, for easy checking of snapshot prefix. Testing is done using check_snapshot function. Gitweb uses the following format for snapshot filenames: <sanitized project name>-<hash parameter><snapshot suffix> where <sanitized project name> is project name with '.git' or '/.git' suffix stripped, unless '.git' is the whole project name. For snapshot prefix it uses simply: <sanitized project name>/ Disadvantages of current snapshot rules: * There exists convention that <basename>.<suffix> archive unpacks to <basename>/ directory (<basename>/ is prefix of archive). Gitweb does not respect it * Snapshot links generated by gitweb use full SHA-1 id as a value of 'h' / $hash parameter. With current rules it leads to long file names like e.g. repo-1005c80cc11c531d327b12195027cbbb4ff9e3cb.tgz * For handcrafted URLs, where 'h' / $hash parameter is a symbolic 'volatile' revision name such as "HEAD" or "next" snapshot name doesn't tell us what exact version it was created from * Proposed filename in Content-Disposition header should not contain any directory path information, which means that it should not contain '/' (see RFC2183)... which means that snapshot naming is broken for $hash being e.g. hirearchical branch name such as 'xx/test' This would be improved in next commit. Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-11-07 15:13:28 +00:00
test_done