development/git
development/git
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git synced 2024-10-30 04:01:21 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
git/Documentation/git-annotate.txt

37 lines
807 B
Text
Raw Normal View History

Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
git-annotate(1)
===============
NAME
----
Documentation: minor grammatical fixes. Signed-off-by: David J. Mellor <dmellor@whistlingcat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-02 06:38:36 +00:00
git-annotate - Annotate file lines with commit information
Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
SYNOPSIS
--------
Documentation formatting and cleanup Following what appears to be the predominant style, format names of commands and commandlines both as `teletype text`. While we're at it, add articles ("a" and "the") in some places, italicize the name of the command in the manual page synopsis line, and add a comma or two where it seems appropriate. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-30 18:56:34 +00:00
'git annotate' [options] file [revision]
Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
DESCRIPTION
-----------
Annotates each line in the given file with information from the commit
Documentation: minor grammatical fixes. Signed-off-by: David J. Mellor <dmellor@whistlingcat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-02 06:38:36 +00:00
which introduced the line. Optionally annotates from a given revision.
Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
Mention the fact that 'git annotate' is only for backward compatibility. When somebody is reading git-blame.txt (or git-annotate.txt) for the first time, the message we would like to send is: (1) Here is why you would want to use this command, what it can do (perhaps more than what you would have expected from "$scm blame"), and how you tell it to do what it does. This is obvious. (2) You might have heard of the command with the other name. There is no difference between the two, except they differ in their default output formats. This is essential to answer: "git has both? how are they different?" (3) We tend to encourage blame over annotate for new scripts and new people, but there is no reason to choose one over the other. This is not as important as (2), but would be useful to avoid repeated questions about "when will we start deprecating this?" As long as we describe (2) on git-annotate page clearly enough, people who read git-blame page first and get curious can refer to git-annotate page. While at it, subtly hint (3) without being overly explicit. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-05 07:29:51 +00:00
The only difference between this command and linkgit:git-blame[1] is that
they use slightly different output formats, and this command exists only
Documentation: minor grammatical fixes. Signed-off-by: David J. Mellor <dmellor@whistlingcat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-03-02 06:38:36 +00:00
for backward compatibility to support existing scripts, and provide a more
Mention the fact that 'git annotate' is only for backward compatibility. When somebody is reading git-blame.txt (or git-annotate.txt) for the first time, the message we would like to send is: (1) Here is why you would want to use this command, what it can do (perhaps more than what you would have expected from "$scm blame"), and how you tell it to do what it does. This is obvious. (2) You might have heard of the command with the other name. There is no difference between the two, except they differ in their default output formats. This is essential to answer: "git has both? how are they different?" (3) We tend to encourage blame over annotate for new scripts and new people, but there is no reason to choose one over the other. This is not as important as (2), but would be useful to avoid repeated questions about "when will we start deprecating this?" As long as we describe (2) on git-annotate page clearly enough, people who read git-blame page first and get curious can refer to git-annotate page. While at it, subtly hint (3) without being overly explicit. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-05 07:29:51 +00:00
familiar command name for people coming from other SCM systems.
Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
OPTIONS
-------
Update git-annotate/git-blame documentation Moved options that pertained to both git-blame and git-annotate to a common file blame-options.txt. builtin-blame.c: Removed --compatibility, --long, --time from the short usage as they are not handled in the code. Documentation/git-blame.txt: Removed common options to git-annotate. Added documentation for --score-debug. Removed --compatibility. Adjusted usage at top to not wrap on 80 columns. Documentation/git-annotate.txt: Using common options blame-options.txt. Documentation/blame-options.txt: Added -b note about associated config option, added --root note about associated config option, added documentation for --show-stats. Removed --long, --time, --rev-file as those options do not really exist. Added documentation for -M/-C taking an optional score argument for detection of moved lines. Signed-off-by: Andrew Ruder <andy@aeruder.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-16 06:20:34 +00:00
include::blame-options.txt[]
Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
SEE ALSO
--------
Documentation: rename gitlink macro to linkgit Between AsciiDoc 8.2.2 and 8.2.3, the following change was made to the stock Asciidoc configuration: @@ -149,7 +153,10 @@ # Inline macros. # Backslash prefix required for escape processing. # (?s) re flag for line spanning. -(?su)[\\]?(?P<name>\w(\w|-)*?):(?P<target>\S*?)(\[(?P<attrlist>.*?)\])= + +# Explicit so they can be nested. +(?su)[\\]?(?P<name>(http|https|ftp|file|mailto|callto|image|link)):(?P<target>\S*?)(\[(?P<attrlist>.*?)\])= + # Anchor: [[[id]]]. Bibliographic anchor. (?su)[\\]?\[\[\[(?P<attrlist>[\w][\w-]*?)\]\]\]=anchor3 # Anchor: [[id,xreflabel]] This default regex now matches explicit values, and unfortunately in this case gitlink was being matched by just 'link', causing the wrong inline macro template to be applied. By renaming the macro, we can avoid being matched by the wrong regex. Signed-off-by: Dan McGee <dpmcgee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2007-12-29 06:20:38 +00:00
linkgit:git-blame[1]
Add git-annotate(1) and git-blame(1) [jc: with entries in git.txt] Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <fonseca@diku.dk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2006-03-06 05:24:44 +00:00
AUTHOR
------
Written by Ryan Anderson <ryan@michonline.com>.
GIT
---
documentation: move git(7) to git(1) As the "git" man page describes the "git" command at the end-user level, it seems better to move it to man section 1. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-06-06 07:07:32 +00:00
Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink