2013-03-17 08:23:46 +00:00
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_description='tests for the peel_ref optimization of packed-refs'
|
2020-11-18 23:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
|
tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.
To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in
- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,
- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
initialize the default branch,
- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,
- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
uses `master`)
This trick was performed by this command:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh
After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:
$ git checkout HEAD -- \
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh
We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18 23:44:19 +00:00
|
|
|
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
|
|
|
|
|
2021-10-12 13:56:44 +00:00
|
|
|
TEST_PASSES_SANITIZE_LEAK=true
|
2013-03-17 08:23:46 +00:00
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'create annotated tag in refs/tags' '
|
|
|
|
test_commit base &&
|
|
|
|
git tag -m annotated foo
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'create annotated tag outside of refs/tags' '
|
|
|
|
git update-ref refs/outside/foo refs/tags/foo
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# This matches show-ref's output
|
|
|
|
print_ref() {
|
|
|
|
echo "$(git rev-parse "$1") $1"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'set up expected show-ref output' '
|
|
|
|
{
|
2020-11-18 23:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/heads/main" &&
|
2013-03-17 08:23:46 +00:00
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/outside/foo" &&
|
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/outside/foo^{}" &&
|
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/tags/base" &&
|
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/tags/foo" &&
|
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/tags/foo^{}"
|
|
|
|
} >expect
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'refs are peeled outside of refs/tags (loose)' '
|
|
|
|
git show-ref -d >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'refs are peeled outside of refs/tags (packed)' '
|
|
|
|
git pack-refs --all &&
|
|
|
|
git show-ref -d >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
pack-refs: add fully-peeled trait
Older versions of pack-refs did not write peel lines for
refs outside of refs/tags. This meant that on reading the
pack-refs file, we might set the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for
such a ref, even though we do not know anything about its
peeled value.
The previous commit updated the writer to always peel, no
matter what the ref is. That means that packed-refs files
written by newer versions of git are fine to be read by both
old and new versions of git. However, we still have the
problem of reading packed-refs files written by older
versions of git, or by other implementations which have not
yet learned the same trick.
The simplest fix would be to always unset the
REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for refs outside of refs/tags that do
not have a peel line (if it has a peel line, we know it is
valid, but we cannot assume a missing peel line means
anything). But that loses an important optimization, as
upload-pack should not need to load the object pointed to by
refs/heads/foo to determine that it is not a tag.
Instead, we add a "fully-peeled" trait to the packed-refs
file. If it is set, we know that we can trust a missing peel
line to mean that a ref cannot be peeled. Otherwise, we fall
back to assuming nothing.
[commit message and tests by Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-18 11:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'create old-style pack-refs without fully-peeled' '
|
|
|
|
# Git no longer writes without fully-peeled, so we just write our own
|
|
|
|
# from scratch; we could also munge the existing file to remove the
|
|
|
|
# fully-peeled bits, but that seems even more prone to failure,
|
|
|
|
# especially if the format ever changes again. At least this way we
|
|
|
|
# know we are emulating exactly what an older git would have written.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
echo "# pack-refs with: peeled " &&
|
2020-11-18 23:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/heads/main" &&
|
pack-refs: add fully-peeled trait
Older versions of pack-refs did not write peel lines for
refs outside of refs/tags. This meant that on reading the
pack-refs file, we might set the REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for
such a ref, even though we do not know anything about its
peeled value.
The previous commit updated the writer to always peel, no
matter what the ref is. That means that packed-refs files
written by newer versions of git are fine to be read by both
old and new versions of git. However, we still have the
problem of reading packed-refs files written by older
versions of git, or by other implementations which have not
yet learned the same trick.
The simplest fix would be to always unset the
REF_KNOWS_PEELED flag for refs outside of refs/tags that do
not have a peel line (if it has a peel line, we know it is
valid, but we cannot assume a missing peel line means
anything). But that loses an important optimization, as
upload-pack should not need to load the object pointed to by
refs/heads/foo to determine that it is not a tag.
Instead, we add a "fully-peeled" trait to the packed-refs
file. If it is set, we know that we can trust a missing peel
line to mean that a ref cannot be peeled. Otherwise, we fall
back to assuming nothing.
[commit message and tests by Jeff King <peff@peff.net>]
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-03-18 11:37:32 +00:00
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/outside/foo" &&
|
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/tags/base" &&
|
|
|
|
print_ref "refs/tags/foo" &&
|
|
|
|
echo "^$(git rev-parse "refs/tags/foo^{}")"
|
|
|
|
} >tmp &&
|
|
|
|
mv tmp .git/packed-refs
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'refs are peeled outside of refs/tags (old packed)' '
|
|
|
|
git show-ref -d >actual &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp expect actual
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
repack_without_ref(): write peeled refs in the rewritten file
When a reference that existed in the packed-refs file is deleted, the
packed-refs file must be rewritten. Previously, the file was
rewritten without any peeled refs, even if the file contained peeled
refs when it was read. This was not a bug, because the packed-refs
file header didn't claim that the file contained peeled values. But
it had a performance cost, because the repository would lose the
benefit of having precomputed peeled references until pack-refs was
run again.
Teach repack_without_ref() to write peeled refs to the packed-refs
file (regardless of whether they were present in the old version of
the file).
This means that if the old version of the packed-refs file was not
fully peeled, then repack_without_ref() will have to peel references.
To avoid the expense of reading lots of loose references, we take two
shortcuts relative to pack-refs:
* If the peeled value of a reference is already known (i.e., because
it was read from the old version of the packed-refs file), then
output that peeled value again without any checks. This is the
usual code path and should avoid any noticeable overhead. (This is
different than pack-refs, which always re-peels references.)
* We don't verify that the packed ref is still current. It could be
that a packed references is overridden by a loose reference, in
which case the packed ref is no longer needed and might even refer
to an object that has been garbage collected. But we don't check;
instead, we just try to peel all references. If peeling is
successful, the peeled value is written out (even though it might
not be needed any more); if not, then the reference is silently
omitted from the output.
The extra overhead of peeling references in repack_without_ref()
should only be incurred the first time the packed-refs file is written
by a version of Git that knows about the "fully-peeled" attribute.
Signed-off-by: Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-22 19:52:29 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'peeled refs survive deletion of packed ref' '
|
2013-04-22 19:52:28 +00:00
|
|
|
git pack-refs --all &&
|
|
|
|
cp .git/packed-refs fully-peeled &&
|
|
|
|
git branch yadda &&
|
|
|
|
git pack-refs --all &&
|
|
|
|
git branch -d yadda &&
|
|
|
|
test_cmp fully-peeled .git/packed-refs
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2013-03-17 08:23:46 +00:00
|
|
|
test_done
|