2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
#!/bin/sh
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_description='Test cherry-pick with directory/file conflicts'
|
2020-11-18 23:44:26 +00:00
|
|
|
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
|
tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch`
In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run
the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure
that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts
that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default.
To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to
force-set the default branch name to `master` in
- all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`,
- t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to
initialize the default branch,
- t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`,
- t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also
uses `master`)
This trick was performed by this command:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \
t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh
After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test
scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a
specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a
comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not
actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the
aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly:
$ git checkout HEAD -- \
t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \
t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \
t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \
t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \
t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \
t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \
t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \
t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \
t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \
t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \
t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \
t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \
t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \
t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \
t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \
t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \
t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \
t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \
t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh
We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range
of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote
branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the
default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests
actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were
modified thusly:
$ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\
' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18 23:44:19 +00:00
|
|
|
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
. ./test-lib.sh
|
|
|
|
|
2011-02-03 15:31:42 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Initialize repository' '
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
mkdir a &&
|
|
|
|
>a/f &&
|
|
|
|
git add a &&
|
2011-02-03 15:31:42 +00:00
|
|
|
git commit -m a
|
|
|
|
'
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2013-06-07 20:53:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Setup rename across paths each below D/F conflicts' '
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
mkdir b &&
|
2013-06-07 20:53:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_ln_s_add ../a b/a &&
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
git commit -m b &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b branch &&
|
|
|
|
rm b/a &&
|
2013-06-07 20:53:32 +00:00
|
|
|
git mv a b/a &&
|
|
|
|
test_ln_s_add b/a a &&
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
git commit -m swap &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>f1 &&
|
|
|
|
git add f1 &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m f1
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2013-06-07 20:53:32 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with rename across D/F conflicts' '
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
2020-11-18 23:44:26 +00:00
|
|
|
git checkout main^0 &&
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
git cherry-pick branch
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2010-09-08 06:40:40 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Setup rename with file on one side matching directory name on other' '
|
|
|
|
git checkout --orphan nick-testcase &&
|
|
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
>empty &&
|
|
|
|
git add empty &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m "Empty file" &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b simple &&
|
|
|
|
mv empty file &&
|
|
|
|
mkdir empty &&
|
|
|
|
mv file empty &&
|
|
|
|
git add empty/file &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m "Empty file under empty dir" &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
echo content >newfile &&
|
|
|
|
git add newfile &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m "New file"
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (resolve)' '
|
|
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -q nick-testcase^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve simple
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir
In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one
side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge,
then the very first check that
string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)
would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict.
However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way
merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to
mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check
for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a
rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work.
This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the
directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also
part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files:
COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE )
--------- --------------- -------
sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub)
<NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>)
then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get
CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge
Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead
Adding newsub/newfile
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
After this patch, the error message will instead become:
Removing newsub
Adding newsub/newfile
CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict
until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if
they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the
way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with
git previously).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-08 06:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick succeeds with was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir (recursive)' '
|
2010-09-08 06:40:40 +00:00
|
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -q nick-testcase^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive simple
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Setup rename with file on one side matching different dirname on other' '
|
|
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout --orphan mergeme &&
|
|
|
|
git rm -rf . &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mkdir sub &&
|
|
|
|
mkdir othersub &&
|
|
|
|
echo content > sub/file &&
|
|
|
|
echo foo > othersub/whatever &&
|
|
|
|
git add -A &&
|
2013-09-04 22:28:45 +00:00
|
|
|
git commit -m "Common commit" &&
|
2010-09-08 06:40:40 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git rm -rf othersub &&
|
|
|
|
git mv sub/file othersub &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m "Commit to merge" &&
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
git checkout -b newhead mergeme~1 &&
|
|
|
|
>independent-change &&
|
|
|
|
git add independent-change &&
|
|
|
|
git commit -m "Completely unrelated change"
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (resolve)' '
|
|
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -q newhead^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git cherry-pick --strategy=resolve mergeme
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
merge-recursive: D/F conflicts where was_a_dir/file -> was_a_dir
In merge-recursive.c, whenever there was a rename where a file name on one
side of the rename matches a directory name on the other side of the merge,
then the very first check that
string_list_has_string(&o->current_directory_set, ren1_dst)
would trigger forcing it into marking it as a rename/directory conflict.
However, if the path is only renamed on one side and a simple three-way
merge between the separate files resolves cleanly, then we don't need to
mark it as a rename/directory conflict. So, we can simply move the check
for rename/directory conflicts after we've verified that there isn't a
rename/rename conflict and that a threeway content merge doesn't work.
This changes the particular error message one gets in the case where the
directory name that a file on one side of the rename matches is not also
part of the rename pair. For example, with commits containing the files:
COMMON -> (HEAD, MERGE )
--------- --------------- -------
sub/file1 -> (sub/file1, newsub)
<NULL> -> (newsub/newfile, <NULL>)
then previously when one tried to merge MERGE into HEAD, one would get
CONFLICT (rename/directory): Rename sub/file1->newsub in HEAD directory newsub added in merge
Renaming sub/file1 to newsub~HEAD instead
Adding newsub/newfile
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
After this patch, the error message will instead become:
Removing newsub
Adding newsub/newfile
CONFLICT (file/directory): There is a directory with name newsub in merge. Adding newsub as newsub~HEAD
Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
That makes more sense to me, because git can't know that there's a conflict
until after it's tried resolving paths involving newsub/newfile to see if
they are still in the way at the end (and if newsub/newfile is not in the
way at the end, there should be no conflict at all, which did not hold with
git previously).
Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-08 06:40:41 +00:00
|
|
|
test_expect_success 'Cherry-pick with rename to different D/F conflict succeeds (recursive)' '
|
2010-09-08 06:40:40 +00:00
|
|
|
git reset --hard &&
|
|
|
|
git checkout -q newhead^0 &&
|
|
|
|
git cherry-pick --strategy=recursive mergeme
|
|
|
|
'
|
|
|
|
|
2010-07-09 13:10:52 +00:00
|
|
|
test_done
|