git/t/t0030-stripspace.sh

452 lines
14 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2007 Carlos Rica
#
test_description='git stripspace'
. ./test-lib.sh
t40='A quick brown fox jumps over the lazy do'
s40=' '
sss="$s40$s40$s40$s40$s40$s40$s40$s40$s40$s40" # 400
ttt="$t40$t40$t40$t40$t40$t40$t40$t40$t40$t40" # 400
test_expect_success \
'long lines without spaces should be unchanged' '
echo "$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$ttt$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$ttt$ttt$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success \
'lines with spaces at the beginning should be unchanged' '
echo "$sss$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$sss$sss$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$sss$sss$sss$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success \
'lines with intermediate spaces should be unchanged' '
echo "$ttt$sss$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$sss$sss$ttt" >expect &&
git stripspace <expect >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success \
'consecutive blank lines should be unified' '
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\n\n\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\n\n\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n\n\n\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\n\n\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\n\n\n\n$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\n\n\n\n$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\t\n \n\n \t\t\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\t\n \n\n \t\t\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n\t\n \n\n \t\t\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\t\n \n\n \t\t\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\t\n \n\n \t\t\n$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\t\n \n\n \t\t\n$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success \
'only consecutive blank lines should be completely removed' '
printf "\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "$sss\n$sss\n$sss\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "$sss$sss\n$sss\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "\n$sss\n$sss$sss\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "$sss$sss$sss$sss\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "\n$sss$sss$sss$sss\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "\n\n$sss$sss$sss$sss\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_must_be_empty actual
'
test_expect_success \
'consecutive blank lines at the beginning should be removed' '
printf "$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "\n\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "\n\n\n$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "\n\n\n$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "\n\n\n$ttt$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$sss\n$sss\n$sss\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "\n$sss\n$sss$sss\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$sss$sss\n$sss\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$sss$sss$sss\n\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "\n$sss$sss$sss\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "\n\n$sss$sss$sss\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success \
'consecutive blank lines at the end should be removed' '
printf "$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$ttt\n\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n" > expect &&
printf "$ttt\n$sss\n$sss\n$sss\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$sss\n$sss$sss\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n$sss$sss\n$sss\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n$sss$sss$sss\n\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n$sss$sss$sss\n\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n\n\n$sss$sss$sss\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success \
'text without newline at end should end with newline' '
test $(printf "$ttt" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$ttt" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$ttt" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0
'
# text plus spaces at the end:
test_expect_success \
'text plus spaces without newline at end should end with newline' '
test $(printf "$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0 &&
test $(printf "$ttt$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace | wc -l) -gt 0
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 09:50:53 +00:00
test_expect_success \
'text plus spaces without newline at end should not show spaces' '
! (printf "$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$ttt$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$ttt$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null)
'
test_expect_success \
'text plus spaces without newline should show the correct lines' '
printf "$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 09:50:53 +00:00
test_expect_success \
'text plus spaces at end should not show spaces' '
! (echo "$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (echo "$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (echo "$ttt$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (echo "$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (echo "$ttt$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (echo "$ttt$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null)
'
test_expect_success \
'text plus spaces at end should be cleaned and newline must remain' '
echo "$ttt" >expect &&
echo "$ttt$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt" >expect &&
echo "$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt" >expect &&
echo "$ttt$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$ttt" >expect &&
echo "$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$ttt" >expect &&
echo "$ttt$ttt$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
echo "$ttt$ttt$ttt" >expect &&
echo "$ttt$ttt$ttt$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
# spaces only:
test_expect_success \
'spaces with newline at end should be replaced with empty string' '
echo | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
echo "$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
echo "$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
echo "$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
echo "$sss$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual
'
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-02-01 09:50:53 +00:00
test_expect_success \
'spaces without newline at end should not show spaces' '
! (printf "" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null) &&
! (printf "$sss$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace | grep " " >/dev/null)
'
test_expect_success \
'spaces without newline at end should be replaced with empty string' '
printf "" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual &&
printf "$sss$sss$sss$sss" | git stripspace >actual &&
tests: use 'test_must_be_empty' instead of 'test_cmp <empty> <out>' Using 'test_must_be_empty' is shorter and more idiomatic than >empty && test_cmp empty out as it saves the creation of an empty file. Furthermore, sometimes the expected empty file doesn't have such a descriptive name like 'empty', and its creation is far away from the place where it's finally used for comparison (e.g. in 't7600-merge.sh', where two expected empty files are created in the 'setup' test, but are used only about 500 lines later). These cases were found by instrumenting 'test_cmp' to error out the test script when it's used to compare empty files, and then converted manually. Note that even after this patch there still remain a lot of cases where we use 'test_cmp' to check empty files: - Sometimes the expected output is not hard-coded in the test, but 'test_cmp' is used to ensure that two similar git commands produce the same output, and that output happens to be empty, e.g. the test 'submodule update --merge - ignores --merge for new submodules' in 't7406-submodule-update.sh'. - Repetitive common tasks, including preparing the expected results and running 'test_cmp', are often extracted into a helper function, and some of this helper's callsites expect no output. - For the same reason as above, the whole 'test_expect_success' block is within a helper function, e.g. in 't3070-wildmatch.sh'. - Or 'test_cmp' is invoked in a loop, e.g. the test 'cvs update (-p)' in 't9400-git-cvsserver-server.sh'. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-08-19 21:57:25 +00:00
test_must_be_empty actual
'
test_expect_success \
'consecutive text lines should be unchanged' '
printf "$ttt$ttt\n$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt\n$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt\n$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt\n\n$ttt$ttt\n$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt\n\n$ttt$ttt\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" >expect &&
printf "$ttt\n$ttt$ttt\n\n$ttt\n" | git stripspace >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'strip comments, too' '
test ! -z "$(echo "# comment" | git stripspace)" &&
test -z "$(echo "# comment" | git stripspace -s)"
'
test_expect_success 'strip comments with changed comment char' '
test ! -z "$(echo "; comment" | git -c core.commentchar=";" stripspace)" &&
test -z "$(echo "; comment" | git -c core.commentchar=";" stripspace -s)"
'
test_expect_success '-c with single line' '
printf "# foo\n" >expect &&
printf "foo" | git stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '-c with single line followed by empty line' '
printf "# foo\n#\n" >expect &&
printf "foo\n\n" | git stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '-c with newline only' '
printf "#\n" >expect &&
printf "\n" | git stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '--comment-lines with single line' '
printf "# foo\n" >expect &&
printf "foo" | git stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '-c with changed comment char' '
printf "; foo\n" >expect &&
printf "foo" | git -c core.commentchar=";" stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '-c with comment char defined in .git/config' '
test_config core.commentchar = &&
printf "= foo\n" >expect &&
rm -fr sub &&
mkdir sub &&
printf "foo" | git -C sub stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success '-c outside git repository' '
printf "# foo\n" >expect &&
printf "foo" | nongit git stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_expect_success 'avoid SP-HT sequence in commented line' '
printf "#\tone\n#\n# two\n" >expect &&
printf "\tone\n\ntwo\n" | git stripspace -c >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'
test_done