development/git
development/git
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git synced 2024-10-28 19:25:47 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
git/t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh

634 lines
14 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
#!/bin/sh
test_description='merge-recursive backend test'
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success 'setup 1' '
echo hello >a &&
o0=$(git hash-object a) &&
cp a b &&
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
cp a c &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
mkdir d &&
cp a d/e &&
test_tick &&
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
git add a b c d/e &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git commit -m initial &&
c0=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
git branch side &&
git branch df-1 &&
git branch df-2 &&
git branch df-3 &&
git branch remove &&
merge-recursive: demonstrate an incorrect conflict with submodule When one side of a merge turns a directory into a submodule, and the other side does not touch that directory (but has other non-conflicting changes), then a merge should succeed. But currently, it does not; it rather fails with a file/directory conflict. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-08 11:34:12 +00:00
git branch submod &&
RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical >Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the >SYMLINKS prereq. Here's a third attempt with no use of symlinks in the test: Skip the entire rename/add conflict case if the file added on the other branch has the same contents as the file being renamed. This avoids giving the user an extra copy of the same file and presenting a conflict that is confusing and pointless. A simple test of this case has been added in t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-01 20:15:32 +00:00
git branch copy &&
git branch rename &&
t3030: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite The test cases include many corner-cases of merge-recursive's behavior, some of them involve type changes and symbolic links. All cases, including those that are protected by SYMLINKS check only whether the result of merge-recursive is correctly stored in the database and the index; the file system is not investigated. Use test_ln_s_add to enter a symbolic link in the index in the test setup and run the tests without the SYMLINKS prerequisite. Notice that one test that has the SYMLINKS protection removed is an expect_failure. There is a possibility that the test fails differently depending on whether SYMLINKS is present or not; but this is not the case presently. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07 20:53:30 +00:00
git branch rename-ln &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo hello >>a &&
cp a d/e &&
o1=$(git hash-object a) &&
git add a d/e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "master modifies a and d/e" &&
c1=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o1 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o1 d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup 2' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -rf [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout side &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo goodbye >>a &&
o2=$(git hash-object a) &&
git add a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "side modifies a" &&
c2=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o2 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o2 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup 3' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -rf [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout df-1 &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
rm -f b && mkdir b && echo df-1 >b/c && git add b/c &&
o3=$(git hash-object b/c) &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "df-1 makes b/c" &&
c3=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o3 b/c"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o3 0 b/c"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup 4' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -rf [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout df-2 &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
rm -f a && mkdir a && echo df-2 >a/c && git add a/c &&
o4=$(git hash-object a/c) &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "df-2 makes a/c" &&
c4=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o4 a/c"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o4 0 a/c"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup 5' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -rf [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout remove &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
rm -f b &&
echo remove-conflict >a &&
git add a &&
git rm b &&
o5=$(git hash-object a) &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "remove removes b and modifies a" &&
c5=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o5 a"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o5 0 a"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup 6' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -rf [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout df-3 &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
rm -fr d && echo df-3 >d && git add d &&
o6=$(git hash-object d) &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "df-3 makes d" &&
c6=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 blob $o6 d"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o6 0 d"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
merge-recursive: demonstrate an incorrect conflict with submodule When one side of a merge turns a directory into a submodule, and the other side does not touch that directory (but has other non-conflicting changes), then a merge should succeed. But currently, it does not; it rather fails with a file/directory conflict. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-08 11:34:12 +00:00
test_expect_success 'setup 7' '
git checkout submod &&
git rm d/e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "remove d/e" &&
git update-index --add --cacheinfo 160000 $c1 d &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "make d/ a submodule"
'
RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical >Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the >SYMLINKS prereq. Here's a third attempt with no use of symlinks in the test: Skip the entire rename/add conflict case if the file added on the other branch has the same contents as the file being renamed. This avoids giving the user an extra copy of the same file and presenting a conflict that is confusing and pointless. A simple test of this case has been added in t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-01 20:15:32 +00:00
test_expect_success 'setup 8' '
git checkout rename &&
git mv a e &&
git add e &&
test_tick &&
t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks d5af510 (RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical 2010-09-01) avoided erroring out in a rename/add conflict when the contents were identical. A simpler fix could have handled that particular testcase, but it would not correctly handle the case where a symlink is involved. Add another testcase using symlinks, to avoid breaking that case. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-20 08:28:34 +00:00
git commit -m "rename a->e" &&
t3030-merge-recursive: test known breakage with empty work tree Sometimes when working with a large repository it can be useful to try out a merge and only check out conflicting files to disk (for example as a speed optimization on a server). Until v1.7.7-rc1~28^2~20 (merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it, 2011-08-11), it was possible to do so with the following idiom: # Prepare a temporary index and empty work tree. GIT_INDEX_FILE="$PWD/tmp-$$-index" && export GIT_INDEX_FILE && GIT_WORK_TREE="$PWD/tmp-$$-work" && export GIT_WORK_TREE && mkdir "$GIT_WORK_TREE" && # Convince the index that our side is on disk. git read-tree -i -m $ours && git update-index --ignore-missing --refresh && # Merge their side into our side. bases=$(git merge-base --all $ours $theirs) && git merge-recursive $bases -- $ours $theirs && tree=$(git write-tree) Nowadays, that still works and the exit status is the same, but merge-recursive produces a diagnostic if "our" side renamed a file: error: addinfo_cache failed for path 'dst' Add a test to document this regression. Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-27 14:45:06 +00:00
c7=$(git rev-parse --verify HEAD) &&
t3030: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite The test cases include many corner-cases of merge-recursive's behavior, some of them involve type changes and symbolic links. All cases, including those that are protected by SYMLINKS check only whether the result of merge-recursive is correctly stored in the database and the index; the file system is not investigated. Use test_ln_s_add to enter a symbolic link in the index in the test setup and run the tests without the SYMLINKS prerequisite. Notice that one test that has the SYMLINKS protection removed is an expect_failure. There is a possibility that the test fails differently depending on whether SYMLINKS is present or not; but this is not the case presently. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07 20:53:30 +00:00
git checkout rename-ln &&
git mv a e &&
test_ln_s_add e a &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "rename a->e, symlink a->e" &&
oln=`printf e | git hash-object --stdin`
RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical >Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the >SYMLINKS prereq. Here's a third attempt with no use of symlinks in the test: Skip the entire rename/add conflict case if the file added on the other branch has the same contents as the file being renamed. This avoids giving the user an extra copy of the same file and presenting a conflict that is confusing and pointless. A simple test of this case has been added in t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-01 20:15:32 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup 9' '
git checkout copy &&
cp a e &&
git add e &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "copy a->e"
'
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive simple' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout -f "$c2" &&
t3030 (merge-recursive): use test_expect_code Use test_expect_code in preference to repeatedly checking exit codes by hand. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08 13:10:13 +00:00
test_expect_code 1 git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c2" "$c1"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive result' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o0 1 a"
echo "100644 $o2 2 a"
echo "100644 $o1 3 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t2020, t2204, t3030, and t3200 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-12 23:20:32 +00:00
test_expect_success 'fail if the index has unresolved entries' '
merge: fix numerus bugs around "trivial merge" area The "trivial merge" codepath wants to optimize itself by making an internal call to the read-tree machinery, but it does not read the index before doing so, and the codepath is never exercised. Incidentally, this failure to read the index upfront means that the safety to refuse doing anything when the index is unmerged does not kick in, either. These two problem are fixed by using read_cache_unmerged() that does read the index before checking if it is unmerged at the beginning of cmd_merge(). The primary logic of the merge, however, assumes that the process never reads the index in-core, and the call to write_cache_as_tree() it makes from write_tree_trivial() will always read from the on-disk index that is prepared the strategy back-ends. This assumption is now broken by the above fix. To fix this issue, we now call discard_cache() before calling write_tree_trivial() when it wants to write the on-disk index as a tree. When multiple strategies are tried, their results are evaluated by reading the resulting index and inspecting it. The codepath needs to make a call to read_cache() for each successful strategy, and for that to work, they need to discard_cache() the one read by the previous round. Also the "trivial merge" forgot that the current commit is one of the parents of the resulting commit. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-23 19:56:57 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
git checkout -f "$c1" &&
test_must_fail git merge "$c5" &&
test_must_fail git merge "$c5" 2> out &&
i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t2020, t2204, t3030, and t3200 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-12 23:20:32 +00:00
test_i18ngrep "not possible because you have unmerged files" out &&
Be more user-friendly when refusing to do something because of conflict. Various commands refuse to run in the presence of conflicts (commit, merge, pull, cherry-pick/revert). They all used to provide rough, and inconsistant error messages. A new variable advice.resolveconflict is introduced, and allows more verbose messages, pointing the user to the appropriate solution. For commit, the error message used to look like this: $ git commit foo.txt: needs merge foo.txt: unmerged (c34a92682e0394bc0d6f4d4a67a8e2d32395c169) foo.txt: unmerged (3afcd75de8de0bb5076942fcb17446be50451030) foo.txt: unmerged (c9785d77b76dfe4fb038bf927ee518f6ae45ede4) error: Error building trees The "need merge" line is given by refresh_cache. We add the IN_PORCELAIN option to make the output more consistant with the other porcelain commands, and catch the error in return, to stop with a clean error message. The next lines were displayed by a call to cache_tree_update(), which is not reached anymore if we noticed the conflict. The new output looks like: U foo.txt fatal: 'commit' is not possible because you have unmerged files. Please, fix them up in the work tree, and then use 'git add/rm <file>' as appropriate to mark resolution and make a commit, or use 'git commit -a'. Pull is slightly modified to abort immediately if $GIT_DIR/MERGE_HEAD exists instead of waiting for merge to complain. The behavior of merge and the test-case are slightly modified to reflect the usual flow: start with conflicts, fix them, and afterwards get rid of MERGE_HEAD, with different error messages at each stage. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-01-12 09:54:44 +00:00
git add -u &&
test_must_fail git merge "$c5" 2> out &&
i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t2020, t2204, t3030, and t3200 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-12 23:20:32 +00:00
test_i18ngrep "You have not concluded your merge" out &&
refuse to merge during a merge The following is an easy mistake to make for users coming from version control systems with an "update and commit"-style workflow. 1. git pull 2. resolve conflicts 3. git pull Step 3 overrides MERGE_HEAD, starting a new merge with dirty index. IOW, probably not what the user intended. Instead, refuse to merge again if a merge is in progress. Reported-by: Dave Olszewski <cxreg@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <drizzd@aon.at> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2009-06-01 09:20:56 +00:00
rm -f .git/MERGE_HEAD &&
test_must_fail git merge "$c5" 2> out &&
i18n: use test_i18ngrep in t2020, t2204, t3030, and t3200 Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-04-12 23:20:32 +00:00
test_i18ngrep "Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge:" out
merge: fix numerus bugs around "trivial merge" area The "trivial merge" codepath wants to optimize itself by making an internal call to the read-tree machinery, but it does not read the index before doing so, and the codepath is never exercised. Incidentally, this failure to read the index upfront means that the safety to refuse doing anything when the index is unmerged does not kick in, either. These two problem are fixed by using read_cache_unmerged() that does read the index before checking if it is unmerged at the beginning of cmd_merge(). The primary logic of the merge, however, assumes that the process never reads the index in-core, and the call to write_cache_as_tree() it makes from write_tree_trivial() will always read from the on-disk index that is prepared the strategy back-ends. This assumption is now broken by the above fix. To fix this issue, we now call discard_cache() before calling write_tree_trivial() when it wants to write the on-disk index as a tree. When multiple strategies are tried, their results are evaluated by reading the resulting index and inspecting it. The codepath needs to make a call to read_cache() for each successful strategy, and for that to work, they need to discard_cache() the one read by the previous round. Also the "trivial merge" forgot that the current commit is one of the parents of the resulting commit. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-08-23 19:56:57 +00:00
'
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive remove conflict' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git checkout -f "$c1" &&
t3030 (merge-recursive): use test_expect_code Use test_expect_code in preference to repeatedly checking exit codes by hand. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08 13:10:13 +00:00
test_expect_code 1 git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c1" "$c5"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive remove conflict' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o0 1 a"
echo "100644 $o1 2 a"
echo "100644 $o5 3 a"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f simple' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -f "$c1" &&
tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t0000 - t3599) Converts tests between t0050-t3903. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-09-03 08:59:27 +00:00
git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c1" "$c3"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive result' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o3 0 b/c"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -f "$c1" &&
t3030 (merge-recursive): use test_expect_code Use test_expect_code in preference to repeatedly checking exit codes by hand. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08 13:10:13 +00:00
test_expect_code 1 git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c1" "$c4"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict result' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o0 1 a"
echo "100644 $o1 2 a"
echo "100644 $o4 0 a/c"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict the other way' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -f "$c4" &&
t3030 (merge-recursive): use test_expect_code Use test_expect_code in preference to repeatedly checking exit codes by hand. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08 13:10:13 +00:00
test_expect_code 1 git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c4" "$c1"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict result the other way' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o0 1 a"
echo "100644 $o1 3 a"
echo "100644 $o4 0 a/c"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -f "$c1" &&
t3030 (merge-recursive): use test_expect_code Use test_expect_code in preference to repeatedly checking exit codes by hand. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08 13:10:13 +00:00
test_expect_code 1 git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c1" "$c6"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict result' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o6 3 d"
echo "100644 $o0 1 d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 2 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict' '
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
rm -fr [abcd] &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -f "$c6" &&
t3030 (merge-recursive): use test_expect_code Use test_expect_code in preference to repeatedly checking exit codes by hand. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-12-08 13:10:13 +00:00
test_expect_code 1 git merge-recursive "$c0" -- "$c6" "$c1"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive d/f conflict result' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o6 2 d"
echo "100644 $o0 1 d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 3 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'reset and 3-way merge' '
git reset --hard "$c2" &&
git read-tree -m "$c0" "$c2" "$c1"
'
test_expect_success 'reset and bind merge' '
git reset --hard master &&
git read-tree --prefix=M/ master &&
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o1 0 M/a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 M/b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 M/c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 M/d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git read-tree --prefix=a1/ master &&
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o1 0 M/a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 M/b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 M/c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 M/d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o1 0 a1/a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a1/b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 a1/c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 a1/d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: add missing && Breaks in a test assertion's && chain can potentially hide failures from earlier commands in the chain. Commands intended to fail should be marked with !, test_must_fail, or test_might_fail. The examples in this patch do not require that. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-10-31 01:46:54 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual &&
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
git read-tree --prefix=z/ master &&
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o1 0 M/a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 M/b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 M/c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 M/d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 0 a"
echo "100644 $o1 0 a1/a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 a1/b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 a1/c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 a1/d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o1 0 z/a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 z/b"
Remove case-sensitive file in t3030-merge-recursive. Rename "A" to the unused "c" Signed-off-by: Brian Gernhardt <benji@silverinsanity.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-19 04:51:06 +00:00
echo "100644 $o0 0 z/c"
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
echo "100644 $o1 0 z/d/e"
) >expected &&
tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2008-05-24 05:28:56 +00:00
test_cmp expected actual
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
'
t3030-merge-recursive: test known breakage with empty work tree Sometimes when working with a large repository it can be useful to try out a merge and only check out conflicting files to disk (for example as a speed optimization on a server). Until v1.7.7-rc1~28^2~20 (merge-recursive: When we detect we can skip an update, actually skip it, 2011-08-11), it was possible to do so with the following idiom: # Prepare a temporary index and empty work tree. GIT_INDEX_FILE="$PWD/tmp-$$-index" && export GIT_INDEX_FILE && GIT_WORK_TREE="$PWD/tmp-$$-work" && export GIT_WORK_TREE && mkdir "$GIT_WORK_TREE" && # Convince the index that our side is on disk. git read-tree -i -m $ours && git update-index --ignore-missing --refresh && # Merge their side into our side. bases=$(git merge-base --all $ours $theirs) && git merge-recursive $bases -- $ours $theirs && tree=$(git write-tree) Nowadays, that still works and the exit status is the same, but merge-recursive produces a diagnostic if "our" side renamed a file: error: addinfo_cache failed for path 'dst' Add a test to document this regression. Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-01-27 14:45:06 +00:00
test_expect_failure 'merge-recursive w/ empty work tree - ours has rename' '
(
GIT_WORK_TREE="$PWD/ours-has-rename-work" &&
export GIT_WORK_TREE &&
GIT_INDEX_FILE="$PWD/ours-has-rename-index" &&
export GIT_INDEX_FILE &&
mkdir "$GIT_WORK_TREE" &&
git read-tree -i -m $c7 &&
git update-index --ignore-missing --refresh &&
git merge-recursive $c0 -- $c7 $c3 &&
git ls-files -s >actual-files
) 2>actual-err &&
>expected-err &&
cat >expected-files <<-EOF &&
100644 $o3 0 b/c
100644 $o0 0 c
100644 $o0 0 d/e
100644 $o0 0 e
EOF
test_cmp expected-files actual-files &&
test_cmp expected-err actual-err
'
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive w/ empty work tree - theirs has rename' '
(
GIT_WORK_TREE="$PWD/theirs-has-rename-work" &&
export GIT_WORK_TREE &&
GIT_INDEX_FILE="$PWD/theirs-has-rename-index" &&
export GIT_INDEX_FILE &&
mkdir "$GIT_WORK_TREE" &&
git read-tree -i -m $c3 &&
git update-index --ignore-missing --refresh &&
git merge-recursive $c0 -- $c3 $c7 &&
git ls-files -s >actual-files
) 2>actual-err &&
>expected-err &&
cat >expected-files <<-EOF &&
100644 $o3 0 b/c
100644 $o0 0 c
100644 $o0 0 d/e
100644 $o0 0 e
EOF
test_cmp expected-files actual-files &&
test_cmp expected-err actual-err
'
Remove empty directories in recursive merge The code was actually supposed to do that, but was accidentally broken. Noticed by Anders Melchiorsen. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
2008-09-25 20:12:45 +00:00
test_expect_success 'merge removes empty directories' '
git reset --hard master &&
git checkout -b rm &&
git rm d/e &&
git commit -mremoved-d/e &&
git checkout master &&
git merge -s recursive rm &&
test_must_fail test -d d
'
merge-recursive: demonstrate an incorrect conflict with submodule When one side of a merge turns a directory into a submodule, and the other side does not touch that directory (but has other non-conflicting changes), then a merge should succeed. But currently, it does not; it rather fails with a file/directory conflict. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-08 11:34:12 +00:00
test_expect_failure 'merge-recursive simple w/submodule' '
git checkout submod &&
git merge remove
'
test_expect_failure 'merge-recursive simple w/submodule result' '
git ls-files -s >actual &&
(
echo "100644 $o5 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
echo "160000 $c1 0 d"
) >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical >Due to this this (and maybe all the tests) need to depend on the >SYMLINKS prereq. Here's a third attempt with no use of symlinks in the test: Skip the entire rename/add conflict case if the file added on the other branch has the same contents as the file being renamed. This avoids giving the user an extra copy of the same file and presenting a conflict that is confusing and pointless. A simple test of this case has been added in t/t3030-merge-recursive.sh. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-01 20:15:32 +00:00
test_expect_success 'merge-recursive copy vs. rename' '
git checkout -f copy &&
git merge rename &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD && git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 blob $o0 e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 e"
) >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
t3030: use test_ln_s_add to remove SYMLINKS prerequisite The test cases include many corner-cases of merge-recursive's behavior, some of them involve type changes and symbolic links. All cases, including those that are protected by SYMLINKS check only whether the result of merge-recursive is correctly stored in the database and the index; the file system is not investigated. Use test_ln_s_add to enter a symbolic link in the index in the test setup and run the tests without the SYMLINKS prerequisite. Notice that one test that has the SYMLINKS protection removed is an expect_failure. There is a possibility that the test fails differently depending on whether SYMLINKS is present or not; but this is not the case presently. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-06-07 20:53:30 +00:00
test_expect_failure 'merge-recursive rename vs. rename/symlink' '
git checkout -f rename &&
git merge rename-ln &&
( git ls-tree -r HEAD ; git ls-files -s ) >actual &&
(
echo "120000 blob $oln a"
echo "100644 blob $o0 b"
echo "100644 blob $o0 c"
echo "100644 blob $o0 d/e"
echo "100644 blob $o0 e"
echo "120000 $oln 0 a"
echo "100644 $o0 0 b"
echo "100644 $o0 0 c"
echo "100644 $o0 0 d/e"
echo "100644 $o0 0 e"
) >expected &&
test_cmp expected actual
'
t3030: Add a testcase for resolvable rename/add conflict with symlinks d5af510 (RE: [PATCH] Avoid rename/add conflict when contents are identical 2010-09-01) avoided erroring out in a rename/add conflict when the contents were identical. A simpler fix could have handled that particular testcase, but it would not correctly handle the case where a symlink is involved. Add another testcase using symlinks, to avoid breaking that case. Signed-off-by: Ken Schalk <ken.schalk@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-09-20 08:28:34 +00:00
t3030: merge-recursive backend test. We have fairly extensive coverage of read-tree 3-way machinery, and many Porcelain-ish tests use git-merge front-end tests, but we did not have good basic test for merge-recursive, which made it very hard to hack on it. I used this during the recent work to teach D/F conflicts to merge-recursive. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
2007-04-07 14:17:35 +00:00
test_done
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink