git/t/t7508-status.sh

1680 lines
44 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2007 Johannes E. Schindelin
#
test_description='git status'
. ./test-lib.sh
. "$TEST_DIRECTORY"/lib-terminal.sh
test_expect_success 'status -h in broken repository' '
git config --global advice.statusuoption false &&
mkdir broken &&
test_when_finished "rm -fr broken" &&
(
cd broken &&
git init &&
echo "[status] showuntrackedfiles = CORRUPT" >>.git/config &&
test_expect_code 129 git status -h >usage 2>&1
) &&
test_i18ngrep "[Uu]sage" broken/usage
'
test_expect_success 'commit -h in broken repository' '
mkdir broken &&
test_when_finished "rm -fr broken" &&
(
cd broken &&
git init &&
echo "[status] showuntrackedfiles = CORRUPT" >>.git/config &&
test_expect_code 129 git commit -h >usage 2>&1
) &&
test_i18ngrep "[Uu]sage" broken/usage
'
test_expect_success 'create upstream branch' '
git checkout -b upstream &&
test_commit upstream1 &&
test_commit upstream2 &&
# leave the first commit on main as root because several
# tests depend on this case; for our upstream we only
# care about commit counts anyway, so a totally divergent
# history is OK
git checkout --orphan main
'
test_expect_success 'setup' '
: >tracked &&
: >modified &&
mkdir dir1 &&
: >dir1/tracked &&
: >dir1/modified &&
mkdir dir2 &&
: >dir1/tracked &&
: >dir1/modified &&
git add . &&
git status >output &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m initial &&
: >untracked &&
: >dir1/untracked &&
: >dir2/untracked &&
echo 1 >dir1/modified &&
echo 2 >dir2/modified &&
echo 3 >dir2/added &&
git add dir2/added &&
git branch --set-upstream-to=upstream
'
test_expect_success 'status (1)' '
test_i18ngrep "use \"git rm --cached <file>\.\.\.\" to unstage" output
'
strip_comments () {
tab=' '
sed "s/^\# //; s/^\#$//; s/^#$tab/$tab/" <"$1" >"$1".tmp &&
rm "$1" && mv "$1".tmp "$1"
}
cat >.gitignore <<\EOF
.gitignore
expect*
output*
EOF
test_expect_success 'status --column' '
cat >expect <<\EOF &&
# On branch main
# Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
# and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
# (use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
#
# Changes to be committed:
# (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
# new file: dir2/added
#
# Changes not staged for commit:
# (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
# (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
# modified: dir1/modified
#
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
# dir1/untracked dir2/untracked
# dir2/modified untracked
#
EOF
COLUMNS=50 git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=true status --column="column dense" >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status --column status.displayCommentPrefix=false' '
strip_comments expect &&
COLUMNS=49 git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=false status --column="column dense" >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
# On branch main
# Your branch and 'upstream' have diverged,
# and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
# (use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
#
# Changes to be committed:
# (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
# new file: dir2/added
#
# Changes not staged for commit:
# (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
# (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
# modified: dir1/modified
#
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
# dir1/untracked
# dir2/modified
# dir2/untracked
# untracked
#
EOF
test_expect_success 'status with status.displayCommentPrefix=true' '
git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=true status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status with status.displayCommentPrefix=false' '
strip_comments expect &&
git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=false status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -v' '
(cat expect && git diff --cached) >expect-with-v &&
git status -v >output &&
test_cmp expect-with-v output
'
test_expect_success 'status -v -v' '
(cat expect &&
echo "Changes to be committed:" &&
git -c diff.mnemonicprefix=true diff --cached &&
echo "--------------------------------------------------" &&
echo "Changes not staged for commit:" &&
git -c diff.mnemonicprefix=true diff) >expect-with-v &&
git status -v -v >output &&
test_cmp expect-with-v output
'
test_expect_success 'setup fake editor' '
cat >.git/editor <<-\EOF &&
#! /bin/sh
cp "$1" output
EOF
chmod 755 .git/editor
'
commit_template_commented () {
(
EDITOR=.git/editor &&
export EDITOR &&
# Fails due to empty message
test_must_fail git commit
) &&
! grep '^[^#]' output
}
test_expect_success 'commit ignores status.displayCommentPrefix=false in COMMIT_EDITMSG' '
commit_template_commented
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
On branch main
Your branch and 'upstream' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
Changes to be committed:
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status (advice.statusHints false)' '
test_config advice.statusHints false &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s' '
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status with gitignore' '
{
echo ".gitignore" &&
echo "expect*" &&
echo "output" &&
echo "untracked"
} >.gitignore &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir2/modified
EOF
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir2/modified
!! .gitignore
!! dir1/untracked
!! dir2/untracked
!! expect
!! expect-with-v
!! output
!! untracked
EOF
git status -s --ignored >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
cat >expect <<\EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir2/modified
Ignored files:
(use "git add -f <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitignore
dir1/untracked
dir2/untracked
expect
expect-with-v
output
untracked
EOF
git status --ignored >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status with gitignore (nothing untracked)' '
{
echo ".gitignore" &&
echo "expect*" &&
echo "dir2/modified" &&
echo "output" &&
echo "untracked"
} >.gitignore &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
EOF
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
cat >expect <<-\EOF &&
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
!! .gitignore
!! dir1/untracked
!! dir2/modified
!! dir2/untracked
!! expect
!! expect-with-v
!! output
!! untracked
EOF
git status -s --ignored >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
cat >expect <<\EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Ignored files:
(use "git add -f <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitignore
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
expect
expect-with-v
output
untracked
EOF
git status --ignored >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >.gitignore <<\EOF
.gitignore
expect*
output*
EOF
cat >expect <<\EOF
## main...upstream [ahead 1, behind 2]
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s -b' '
git status -s -b >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -s -z -b' '
tr "\\n" Q <expect >expect.q &&
mv expect.q expect &&
git status -s -z -b >output &&
nul_to_q <output >output.q &&
mv output.q output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'setup dir3' '
mkdir dir3 &&
: >dir3/untracked1 &&
: >dir3/untracked2
'
test_expect_success 'status -uno' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files not listed (use -u option to show untracked files)
EOF
git status -uno >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status (status.showUntrackedFiles no)' '
test_config status.showuntrackedfiles no &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -uno (advice.statusHints false)' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
Changes to be committed:
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files not listed
EOF
test_config advice.statusHints false &&
git status -uno >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect << EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s -uno' '
git status -s -uno >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -s (status.showUntrackedFiles no)' '
git config status.showuntrackedfiles no &&
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -unormal' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
dir3/
untracked
EOF
git status -unormal >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status (status.showUntrackedFiles normal)' '
test_config status.showuntrackedfiles normal &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? dir3/
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s -unormal' '
git status -s -unormal >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -s (status.showUntrackedFiles normal)' '
git config status.showuntrackedfiles normal &&
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -uall' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
dir3/untracked1
dir3/untracked2
untracked
EOF
git status -uall >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status (status.showUntrackedFiles all)' '
test_config status.showuntrackedfiles all &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'teardown dir3' '
rm -rf dir3
'
cat >expect <<EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s -uall' '
test_unconfig status.showuntrackedfiles &&
git status -s -uall >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -s (status.showUntrackedFiles all)' '
test_config status.showuntrackedfiles all &&
git status -s >output &&
rm -rf dir3 &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status with relative paths' '
cat >expect <<\EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: ../dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
untracked
../dir2/modified
../dir2/untracked
../untracked
EOF
(cd dir1 && git status) >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
M modified
A ../dir2/added
?? untracked
?? ../dir2/modified
?? ../dir2/untracked
?? ../untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s with relative paths' '
(cd dir1 && git status -s) >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status --porcelain ignores relative paths setting' '
(cd dir1 && git status --porcelain) >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'setup unique colors' '
git config status.color.untracked blue &&
git config status.color.branch green &&
git config status.color.localBranch yellow &&
git config status.color.remoteBranch cyan
'
test_expect_success TTY 'status with color.ui' '
cat >expect <<\EOF &&
On branch <GREEN>main<RESET>
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
<GREEN>new file: dir2/added<RESET>
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
<RED>modified: dir1/modified<RESET>
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
<BLUE>dir1/untracked<RESET>
<BLUE>dir2/modified<RESET>
<BLUE>dir2/untracked<RESET>
<BLUE>untracked<RESET>
EOF
test_config color.ui auto &&
test_terminal git status | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success TTY 'status with color.status' '
test_config color.status auto &&
test_terminal git status | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
<RED>M<RESET> dir1/modified
<GREEN>A<RESET> dir2/added
<BLUE>??<RESET> dir1/untracked
<BLUE>??<RESET> dir2/modified
<BLUE>??<RESET> dir2/untracked
<BLUE>??<RESET> untracked
EOF
test_expect_success TTY 'status -s with color.ui' '
git config color.ui auto &&
test_terminal git status -s | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success TTY 'status -s with color.status' '
git config --unset color.ui &&
git config color.status auto &&
test_terminal git status -s | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
## <YELLOW>main<RESET>...<CYAN>upstream<RESET> [ahead <YELLOW>1<RESET>, behind <CYAN>2<RESET>]
<RED>M<RESET> dir1/modified
<GREEN>A<RESET> dir2/added
<BLUE>??<RESET> dir1/untracked
<BLUE>??<RESET> dir2/modified
<BLUE>??<RESET> dir2/untracked
<BLUE>??<RESET> untracked
EOF
test_expect_success TTY 'status -s -b with color.status' '
test_terminal git status -s -b | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success TTY 'status --porcelain ignores color.ui' '
git config --unset color.status &&
git config color.ui auto &&
test_terminal git status --porcelain | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success TTY 'status --porcelain ignores color.status' '
git config --unset color.ui &&
git config color.status auto &&
test_terminal git status --porcelain | test_decode_color >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
# recover unconditionally from color tests
git config --unset color.status
git config --unset color.ui
test_expect_success 'status --porcelain respects -b' '
git status --porcelain -b >output &&
{
echo "## main...upstream [ahead 1, behind 2]" &&
cat expect
} >tmp &&
mv tmp expect &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status without relative paths' '
cat >expect <<\EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
test_config status.relativePaths false &&
(cd dir1 && git status) >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s without relative paths' '
test_config status.relativePaths false &&
(cd dir1 && git status -s) >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<\EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
A "file with spaces"
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? "file with spaces 2"
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s without relative paths' '
test_when_finished "git rm --cached \"file with spaces\"; rm -f file*" &&
>"file with spaces" &&
>"file with spaces 2" &&
>"expect with spaces" &&
git add "file with spaces" &&
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git status -s --ignored >output &&
grep "^!! \"expect with spaces\"$" output &&
grep -v "^!! " output >output-wo-ignored &&
test_cmp expect output-wo-ignored
'
test_expect_success 'dry-run of partial commit excluding new file in index' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/
untracked
EOF
git commit --dry-run dir1/modified >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<EOF
:100644 100644 $EMPTY_BLOB $ZERO_OID M dir1/modified
EOF
test_expect_success 'status refreshes the index' '
touch dir2/added &&
git status &&
git diff-files >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status shows detached HEAD properly after checking out non-local upstream branch' '
test_when_finished rm -rf upstream downstream actual &&
test_create_repo upstream &&
test_commit -C upstream foo &&
git clone upstream downstream &&
git -C downstream checkout @{u} &&
git -C downstream status >actual &&
grep -E "HEAD detached at [0-9a-f]+" actual
'
test_expect_success 'setup status submodule summary' '
test_create_repo sm && (
cd sm &&
>foo &&
git add foo &&
git commit -m "Add foo"
) &&
git add sm
'
test_expect_success 'status submodule summary is disabled by default' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
new file: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
# we expect the same as the previous test
test_expect_success 'status --untracked-files=all does not show submodule' '
git status --untracked-files=all >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
A sm
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s submodule summary is disabled by default' '
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
# we expect the same as the previous test
test_expect_success 'status -s --untracked-files=all does not show submodule' '
git status -s --untracked-files=all >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
head=$(cd sm && git rev-parse --short=7 --verify HEAD)
test_expect_success 'status submodule summary' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 1 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
new file: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Submodule changes to be committed:
* sm 0000000...$head (1):
> Add foo
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
git config status.submodulesummary 10 &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status submodule summary with status.displayCommentPrefix=false' '
strip_comments expect &&
git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=false status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'commit with submodule summary ignores status.displayCommentPrefix' '
commit_template_commented
'
cat >expect <<EOF
M dir1/modified
A dir2/added
A sm
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s submodule summary' '
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status submodule summary (clean submodule): commit' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
EOF
git commit -m "commit submodule" &&
git config status.submodulesummary 10 &&
test_must_fail git commit --dry-run >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
cat >expect <<EOF
M dir1/modified
?? dir1/untracked
?? dir2/modified
?? dir2/untracked
?? untracked
EOF
test_expect_success 'status -s submodule summary (clean submodule)' '
git status -s >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'status -z implies porcelain' '
git status --porcelain |
perl -pe "s/\012/\000/g" >expect &&
git status -z >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success 'commit --dry-run submodule summary (--amend)' '
cat >expect <<EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --source=HEAD^1 --staged <file>..." to unstage)
new file: dir2/added
new file: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Submodule changes to be committed:
* sm 0000000...$head (1):
> Add foo
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
git config status.submodulesummary 10 &&
git commit --dry-run --amend >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success POSIXPERM,SANITY 'status succeeds in a read-only repository' '
test_when_finished "chmod 775 .git" &&
(
chmod a-w .git &&
# make dir1/tracked stat-dirty
>dir1/tracked1 && mv -f dir1/tracked1 dir1/tracked &&
git status -s >output &&
! grep dir1/tracked output &&
# make sure "status" succeeded without writing index out
git diff-files | grep dir1/tracked
)
'
(cd sm && echo > bar && git add bar && git commit -q -m 'Add bar') && git add sm
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
new_head=$(cd sm && git rev-parse --short=7 --verify HEAD)
touch .gitmodules
test_expect_success '--ignore-submodules=untracked suppresses submodules with untracked content' '
cat > expect << EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Submodule changes to be committed:
* sm $head...$new_head (1):
> Add bar
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitmodules
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
echo modified sm/untracked &&
git status --ignore-submodules=untracked >output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
test_expect_success '.gitmodules ignore=untracked suppresses submodules with untracked content' '
test_config diff.ignoreSubmodules dirty &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore untracked &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
test_expect_success '.git/config ignore=untracked suppresses submodules with untracked content' '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore untracked &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config --remove-section -f .gitmodules submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
test_expect_success '--ignore-submodules=dirty suppresses submodules with untracked content' '
git status --ignore-submodules=dirty >output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
test_expect_success '.gitmodules ignore=dirty suppresses submodules with untracked content' '
test_config diff.ignoreSubmodules dirty &&
git status >output &&
! test -s actual &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore dirty &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
test_expect_success '.git/config ignore=dirty suppresses submodules with untracked content' '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore dirty &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
test_expect_success '--ignore-submodules=dirty suppresses submodules with modified content' '
echo modified >sm/foo &&
git status --ignore-submodules=dirty >output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
test_expect_success '.gitmodules ignore=dirty suppresses submodules with modified content' '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore dirty &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
test_expect_success '.git/config ignore=dirty suppresses submodules with modified content' '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore dirty &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
test_expect_success "--ignore-submodules=untracked doesn't suppress submodules with modified content" '
cat > expect << EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
(commit or discard the untracked or modified content in submodules)
modified: dir1/modified
modified: sm (modified content)
Submodule changes to be committed:
* sm $head...$new_head (1):
> Add bar
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitmodules
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
git status --ignore-submodules=untracked > output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
test_expect_success ".gitmodules ignore=untracked doesn't suppress submodules with modified content" '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore untracked &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
test_expect_success ".git/config ignore=untracked doesn't suppress submodules with modified content" '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore untracked &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
head2=$(cd sm && git commit -q -m "2nd commit" foo && git rev-parse --short=7 --verify HEAD)
test_expect_success "--ignore-submodules=untracked doesn't suppress submodule summary" '
cat > expect << EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
modified: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
modified: sm (new commits)
Submodule changes to be committed:
* sm $head...$new_head (1):
> Add bar
Submodules changed but not updated:
* sm $new_head...$head2 (1):
> 2nd commit
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitmodules
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
git status --ignore-submodules=untracked > output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
test_expect_success ".gitmodules ignore=untracked doesn't suppress submodule summary" '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore untracked &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
test_expect_success ".git/config ignore=untracked doesn't suppress submodule summary" '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore untracked &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
test_expect_success "--ignore-submodules=dirty doesn't suppress submodule summary" '
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
git status --ignore-submodules=dirty > output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
test_expect_success ".gitmodules ignore=dirty doesn't suppress submodule summary" '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore dirty &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
test_expect_success ".git/config ignore=dirty doesn't suppress submodule summary" '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore dirty &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
cat > expect << EOF
; On branch main
; Your branch and 'upstream' have diverged,
; and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
; (use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
;
; Changes to be committed:
; (use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
; modified: sm
;
; Changes not staged for commit:
; (use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
; (use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
; modified: dir1/modified
; modified: sm (new commits)
;
; Submodule changes to be committed:
;
; * sm $head...$new_head (1):
; > Add bar
;
; Submodules changed but not updated:
;
; * sm $new_head...$head2 (1):
; > 2nd commit
;
; Untracked files:
; (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
; .gitmodules
; dir1/untracked
; dir2/modified
; dir2/untracked
; untracked
;
EOF
test_expect_success "status (core.commentchar with submodule summary)" '
test_config core.commentchar ";" &&
git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=true status >output &&
test_cmp expect output
'
test_expect_success "status (core.commentchar with two chars with submodule summary)" '
test_config core.commentchar ";;" &&
test_must_fail git -c status.displayCommentPrefix=true status
'
test_expect_success "--ignore-submodules=all suppresses submodule summary" '
cat > expect << EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitmodules
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
no changes added to commit (use "git add" and/or "git commit -a")
EOF
git status --ignore-submodules=all > output &&
test_cmp expect output
Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-06-25 14:56:47 +00:00
'
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
test_expect_success '.gitmodules ignore=all suppresses unstaged submodule summary' '
cat > expect << EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
modified: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
.gitmodules
dir1/untracked
dir2/modified
dir2/untracked
untracked
EOF
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore all &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status > output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
test_expect_success '.git/config ignore=all suppresses unstaged submodule summary' '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore none &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore all &&
git config --add submodule.subname.path sm &&
git status > output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2010-08-05 22:39:25 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'setup of test environment' '
git config status.showUntrackedFiles no &&
git status -s >expected_short &&
git status --no-short >expected_noshort
'
test_expect_success '"status.short=true" same as "-s"' '
git -c status.short=true status >actual &&
test_cmp expected_short actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.short=true" weaker than "--no-short"' '
git -c status.short=true status --no-short >actual &&
test_cmp expected_noshort actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.short=false" same as "--no-short"' '
git -c status.short=false status >actual &&
test_cmp expected_noshort actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.short=false" weaker than "-s"' '
git -c status.short=false status -s >actual &&
test_cmp expected_short actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.branch=true" same as "-b"' '
git status -sb >expected_branch &&
git -c status.branch=true status -s >actual &&
test_cmp expected_branch actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.branch=true" different from "--no-branch"' '
git status -s --no-branch >expected_nobranch &&
git -c status.branch=true status -s >actual &&
! test_cmp expected_nobranch actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.branch=true" weaker than "--no-branch"' '
git -c status.branch=true status -s --no-branch >actual &&
test_cmp expected_nobranch actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.branch=true" weaker than "--porcelain"' '
git -c status.branch=true status --porcelain >actual &&
test_cmp expected_nobranch actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.branch=false" same as "--no-branch"' '
git -c status.branch=false status -s >actual &&
test_cmp expected_nobranch actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.branch=false" weaker than "-b"' '
git -c status.branch=false status -sb >actual &&
test_cmp expected_branch actual
'
test_expect_success 'Restore default test environment' '
git config --unset status.showUntrackedFiles
'
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
test_expect_success 'git commit will commit a staged but ignored submodule' '
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.ignore all &&
git config --add -f .gitmodules submodule.subname.path sm &&
git config --add submodule.subname.ignore all &&
git status -s --ignore-submodules=dirty >output &&
test_i18ngrep "^M. sm" output &&
GIT_EDITOR="echo hello >>\"\$1\"" &&
export GIT_EDITOR &&
git commit -uno &&
git status -s --ignore-submodules=dirty >output &&
test_i18ngrep ! "^M. sm" output
'
test_expect_success 'git commit --dry-run will show a staged but ignored submodule' '
git reset HEAD^ &&
git add sm &&
cat >expect << EOF &&
On branch main
Your branch and '\''upstream'\'' have diverged,
and have 2 and 2 different commits each, respectively.
(use "git pull" to merge the remote branch into yours)
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
Changes to be committed:
(use "git restore --staged <file>..." to unstage)
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
modified: sm
Changes not staged for commit:
(use "git add <file>..." to update what will be committed)
(use "git restore <file>..." to discard changes in working directory)
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
modified: dir1/modified
Untracked files not listed (use -u option to show untracked files)
EOF
git commit -uno --dry-run >output &&
test_cmp expect output &&
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
git status -s --ignore-submodules=dirty >output &&
test_i18ngrep "^M. sm" output
'
test_expect_success 'git commit -m will commit a staged but ignored submodule' '
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
git commit -uno -m message &&
git status -s --ignore-submodules=dirty >output &&
test_i18ngrep ! "^M. sm" output &&
status/commit: show staged submodules regardless of ignore config Currently setting submodule.<name>.ignore and/or diff.ignoreSubmodules to "all" suppresses all output of submodule changes for the diff family, status and commit. For status and commit this is really confusing, as it even when the user chooses to record a new commit for an ignored submodule by adding it manually this change won't show up under the to-be-committed changes. To add insult to injury, a later "git commit" will error out with "nothing to commit" when only ignored submodules are staged. Fix that by making wt_status always print staged submodule changes, no matter what ignore settings are configured. The only exception is when the user explicitly uses the "--ignore-submodules=all" command line option, in that case the submodule output is still suppressed. This also makes "git commit" work again when only modifications of ignored submodules are staged, as that command uses the "commitable" member of the wt_status struct to determine if staged changes are present. But this only happens when the commit command uses the wt_status* functions to produce status output for human consumption (when forking an editor or with --dry-run), in all other cases (e.g. when run in a script with '-m') another code path is taken which uses index_differs_from() to determine if any changes are staged which still ignores submodules according to their configuration. This will be fixed in a follow-up commit. Change t7508 to reflect this new behavior and add three new tests to show that a single staged submodule configured to be ignored will be committed when the status output is generated and won't be if not. Also update the documentation of the ignore config options accordingly. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-05 16:59:03 +00:00
git config --remove-section submodule.subname &&
git config -f .gitmodules --remove-section submodule.subname
'
test_expect_success 'show stash info with "--show-stash"' '
git reset --hard &&
git stash clear &&
echo 1 >file &&
git add file &&
git stash &&
git status >expected_default &&
git status --show-stash >expected_with_stash &&
test_i18ngrep "^Your stash currently has 1 entry$" expected_with_stash
'
test_expect_success 'no stash info with "--show-stash --no-show-stash"' '
git status --show-stash --no-show-stash >expected_without_stash &&
test_cmp expected_default expected_without_stash
'
test_expect_success '"status.showStash=false" weaker than "--show-stash"' '
git -c status.showStash=false status --show-stash >actual &&
test_cmp expected_with_stash actual
'
test_expect_success '"status.showStash=true" weaker than "--no-show-stash"' '
git -c status.showStash=true status --no-show-stash >actual &&
test_cmp expected_without_stash actual
'
test_expect_success 'no additional info if no stash entries' '
git stash clear &&
git -c status.showStash=true status >actual &&
test_cmp expected_without_stash actual
'
test_expect_success '"No commits yet" should be noted in status output' '
git checkout --orphan empty-branch-1 &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep "No commits yet" output
'
test_expect_success '"No commits yet" should not be noted in status output' '
git checkout --orphan empty-branch-2 &&
test_commit test-commit-1 &&
git status >output &&
test_i18ngrep ! "No commits yet" output
'
test_expect_success '"Initial commit" should be noted in commit template' '
git checkout --orphan empty-branch-3 &&
touch to_be_committed_1 &&
git add to_be_committed_1 &&
git commit --dry-run >output &&
test_i18ngrep "Initial commit" output
'
test_expect_success '"Initial commit" should not be noted in commit template' '
git checkout --orphan empty-branch-4 &&
test_commit test-commit-2 &&
touch to_be_committed_2 &&
git add to_be_committed_2 &&
git commit --dry-run >output &&
test_i18ngrep ! "Initial commit" output
'
git: add --no-optional-locks option Some tools like IDEs or fancy editors may periodically run commands like "git status" in the background to keep track of the state of the repository. Some of these commands may refresh the index and write out the result in an opportunistic way: if they can get the index lock, then they update the on-disk index with any updates they find. And if not, then their in-core refresh is lost and just has to be recomputed by the next caller. But taking the index lock may conflict with other operations in the repository. Especially ones that the user is doing themselves, which _aren't_ opportunistic. In other words, "git status" knows how to back off when somebody else is holding the lock, but other commands don't know that status would be happy to drop the lock if somebody else wanted it. There are a couple possible solutions: 1. Have some kind of "pseudo-lock" that allows other commands to tell status that they want the lock. This is likely to be complicated and error-prone to implement (and maybe even impossible with just dotlocks to work from, as it requires some inter-process communication). 2. Avoid background runs of commands like "git status" that want to do opportunistic updates, preferring instead plumbing like diff-files, etc. This is awkward for a couple of reasons. One is that "status --porcelain" reports a lot more about the repository state than is available from individual plumbing commands. And two is that we actually _do_ want to see the refreshed index. We just don't want to take a lock or write out the result. Whereas commands like diff-files expect us to refresh the index separately and write it to disk so that they can depend on the result. But that write is exactly what we're trying to avoid. 3. Ask "status" not to lock or write the index. This is easy to implement. The big downside is that any work done in refreshing the index for such a call is lost when the process exits. So a background process may end up re-hashing a changed file multiple times until the user runs a command that does an index refresh themselves. This patch implements the option 3. The idea (and the test) is largely stolen from a Git for Windows patch by Johannes Schindelin, 67e5ce7f63 (status: offer *not* to lock the index and update it, 2016-08-12). The twist here is that instead of making this an option to "git status", it becomes a "git" option and matching environment variable. The reason there is two-fold: 1. An environment variable is carried through to sub-processes. And whether an invocation is a background process or not should apply to the whole process tree. So you could do "git --no-optional-locks foo", and if "foo" is a script or alias that calls "status", you'll still get the effect. 2. There may be other programs that want the same treatment. I've punted here on finding more callers to convert, since "status" is the obvious one to call as a repeated background job. But "git diff"'s opportunistic refresh of the index may be a good candidate. The test is taken from 67e5ce7f63, and it's worth repeating Johannes's explanation: Note that the regression test added in this commit does not *really* verify that no index.lock file was written; that test is not possible in a portable way. Instead, we verify that .git/index is rewritten *only* when `git status` is run without `--no-optional-locks`. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-27 06:54:30 +00:00
test_expect_success '--no-optional-locks prevents index update' '
test_set_magic_mtime .git/index &&
git: add --no-optional-locks option Some tools like IDEs or fancy editors may periodically run commands like "git status" in the background to keep track of the state of the repository. Some of these commands may refresh the index and write out the result in an opportunistic way: if they can get the index lock, then they update the on-disk index with any updates they find. And if not, then their in-core refresh is lost and just has to be recomputed by the next caller. But taking the index lock may conflict with other operations in the repository. Especially ones that the user is doing themselves, which _aren't_ opportunistic. In other words, "git status" knows how to back off when somebody else is holding the lock, but other commands don't know that status would be happy to drop the lock if somebody else wanted it. There are a couple possible solutions: 1. Have some kind of "pseudo-lock" that allows other commands to tell status that they want the lock. This is likely to be complicated and error-prone to implement (and maybe even impossible with just dotlocks to work from, as it requires some inter-process communication). 2. Avoid background runs of commands like "git status" that want to do opportunistic updates, preferring instead plumbing like diff-files, etc. This is awkward for a couple of reasons. One is that "status --porcelain" reports a lot more about the repository state than is available from individual plumbing commands. And two is that we actually _do_ want to see the refreshed index. We just don't want to take a lock or write out the result. Whereas commands like diff-files expect us to refresh the index separately and write it to disk so that they can depend on the result. But that write is exactly what we're trying to avoid. 3. Ask "status" not to lock or write the index. This is easy to implement. The big downside is that any work done in refreshing the index for such a call is lost when the process exits. So a background process may end up re-hashing a changed file multiple times until the user runs a command that does an index refresh themselves. This patch implements the option 3. The idea (and the test) is largely stolen from a Git for Windows patch by Johannes Schindelin, 67e5ce7f63 (status: offer *not* to lock the index and update it, 2016-08-12). The twist here is that instead of making this an option to "git status", it becomes a "git" option and matching environment variable. The reason there is two-fold: 1. An environment variable is carried through to sub-processes. And whether an invocation is a background process or not should apply to the whole process tree. So you could do "git --no-optional-locks foo", and if "foo" is a script or alias that calls "status", you'll still get the effect. 2. There may be other programs that want the same treatment. I've punted here on finding more callers to convert, since "status" is the obvious one to call as a repeated background job. But "git diff"'s opportunistic refresh of the index may be a good candidate. The test is taken from 67e5ce7f63, and it's worth repeating Johannes's explanation: Note that the regression test added in this commit does not *really* verify that no index.lock file was written; that test is not possible in a portable way. Instead, we verify that .git/index is rewritten *only* when `git status` is run without `--no-optional-locks`. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-27 06:54:30 +00:00
git --no-optional-locks status &&
test_is_magic_mtime .git/index &&
git: add --no-optional-locks option Some tools like IDEs or fancy editors may periodically run commands like "git status" in the background to keep track of the state of the repository. Some of these commands may refresh the index and write out the result in an opportunistic way: if they can get the index lock, then they update the on-disk index with any updates they find. And if not, then their in-core refresh is lost and just has to be recomputed by the next caller. But taking the index lock may conflict with other operations in the repository. Especially ones that the user is doing themselves, which _aren't_ opportunistic. In other words, "git status" knows how to back off when somebody else is holding the lock, but other commands don't know that status would be happy to drop the lock if somebody else wanted it. There are a couple possible solutions: 1. Have some kind of "pseudo-lock" that allows other commands to tell status that they want the lock. This is likely to be complicated and error-prone to implement (and maybe even impossible with just dotlocks to work from, as it requires some inter-process communication). 2. Avoid background runs of commands like "git status" that want to do opportunistic updates, preferring instead plumbing like diff-files, etc. This is awkward for a couple of reasons. One is that "status --porcelain" reports a lot more about the repository state than is available from individual plumbing commands. And two is that we actually _do_ want to see the refreshed index. We just don't want to take a lock or write out the result. Whereas commands like diff-files expect us to refresh the index separately and write it to disk so that they can depend on the result. But that write is exactly what we're trying to avoid. 3. Ask "status" not to lock or write the index. This is easy to implement. The big downside is that any work done in refreshing the index for such a call is lost when the process exits. So a background process may end up re-hashing a changed file multiple times until the user runs a command that does an index refresh themselves. This patch implements the option 3. The idea (and the test) is largely stolen from a Git for Windows patch by Johannes Schindelin, 67e5ce7f63 (status: offer *not* to lock the index and update it, 2016-08-12). The twist here is that instead of making this an option to "git status", it becomes a "git" option and matching environment variable. The reason there is two-fold: 1. An environment variable is carried through to sub-processes. And whether an invocation is a background process or not should apply to the whole process tree. So you could do "git --no-optional-locks foo", and if "foo" is a script or alias that calls "status", you'll still get the effect. 2. There may be other programs that want the same treatment. I've punted here on finding more callers to convert, since "status" is the obvious one to call as a repeated background job. But "git diff"'s opportunistic refresh of the index may be a good candidate. The test is taken from 67e5ce7f63, and it's worth repeating Johannes's explanation: Note that the regression test added in this commit does not *really* verify that no index.lock file was written; that test is not possible in a portable way. Instead, we verify that .git/index is rewritten *only* when `git status` is run without `--no-optional-locks`. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-27 06:54:30 +00:00
git status &&
! test_is_magic_mtime .git/index
git: add --no-optional-locks option Some tools like IDEs or fancy editors may periodically run commands like "git status" in the background to keep track of the state of the repository. Some of these commands may refresh the index and write out the result in an opportunistic way: if they can get the index lock, then they update the on-disk index with any updates they find. And if not, then their in-core refresh is lost and just has to be recomputed by the next caller. But taking the index lock may conflict with other operations in the repository. Especially ones that the user is doing themselves, which _aren't_ opportunistic. In other words, "git status" knows how to back off when somebody else is holding the lock, but other commands don't know that status would be happy to drop the lock if somebody else wanted it. There are a couple possible solutions: 1. Have some kind of "pseudo-lock" that allows other commands to tell status that they want the lock. This is likely to be complicated and error-prone to implement (and maybe even impossible with just dotlocks to work from, as it requires some inter-process communication). 2. Avoid background runs of commands like "git status" that want to do opportunistic updates, preferring instead plumbing like diff-files, etc. This is awkward for a couple of reasons. One is that "status --porcelain" reports a lot more about the repository state than is available from individual plumbing commands. And two is that we actually _do_ want to see the refreshed index. We just don't want to take a lock or write out the result. Whereas commands like diff-files expect us to refresh the index separately and write it to disk so that they can depend on the result. But that write is exactly what we're trying to avoid. 3. Ask "status" not to lock or write the index. This is easy to implement. The big downside is that any work done in refreshing the index for such a call is lost when the process exits. So a background process may end up re-hashing a changed file multiple times until the user runs a command that does an index refresh themselves. This patch implements the option 3. The idea (and the test) is largely stolen from a Git for Windows patch by Johannes Schindelin, 67e5ce7f63 (status: offer *not* to lock the index and update it, 2016-08-12). The twist here is that instead of making this an option to "git status", it becomes a "git" option and matching environment variable. The reason there is two-fold: 1. An environment variable is carried through to sub-processes. And whether an invocation is a background process or not should apply to the whole process tree. So you could do "git --no-optional-locks foo", and if "foo" is a script or alias that calls "status", you'll still get the effect. 2. There may be other programs that want the same treatment. I've punted here on finding more callers to convert, since "status" is the obvious one to call as a repeated background job. But "git diff"'s opportunistic refresh of the index may be a good candidate. The test is taken from 67e5ce7f63, and it's worth repeating Johannes's explanation: Note that the regression test added in this commit does not *really* verify that no index.lock file was written; that test is not possible in a portable way. Instead, we verify that .git/index is rewritten *only* when `git status` is run without `--no-optional-locks`. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-09-27 06:54:30 +00:00
'
test_expect_success 'racy timestamps will be fixed for clean worktree' '
echo content >racy-dirty &&
echo content >racy-racy &&
git add racy* &&
git commit -m "racy test files" &&
# let status rewrite the index, if necessary; after that we expect
# no more index writes unless caused by racy timestamps; note that
# timestamps may already be racy now (depending on previous tests)
git status &&
test_set_magic_mtime .git/index &&
git status &&
! test_is_magic_mtime .git/index
'
test_expect_success 'racy timestamps will be fixed for dirty worktree' '
echo content2 >racy-dirty &&
git status &&
test_set_magic_mtime .git/index &&
git status &&
! test_is_magic_mtime .git/index
'
test_done