git/t/t3420-rebase-autostash.sh

337 lines
9.9 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2013 Ramkumar Ramachandra
#
test_description='git rebase --autostash tests'
GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=main
tests: mark tests relying on the current default for `init.defaultBranch` In addition to the manual adjustment to let the `linux-gcc` CI job run the test suite with `master` and then with `main`, this patch makes sure that GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME is set in all test scripts that currently rely on the initial branch name being `master by default. To determine which test scripts to mark up, the first step was to force-set the default branch name to `master` in - all test scripts that contain the keyword `master`, - t4211, which expects `t/t4211/history.export` with a hard-coded ref to initialize the default branch, - t5560 because it sources `t/t556x_common` which uses `master`, - t8002 and t8012 because both source `t/annotate-tests.sh` which also uses `master`) This trick was performed by this command: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/\(test-lib\|lib-\(bash\|cvs\|git-svn\)\|gitweb-lib\)\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' $(git grep -l master t/t[0-9]*.sh) \ t/t4211*.sh t/t5560*.sh t/t8002*.sh t/t8012*.sh After that, careful, manual inspection revealed that some of the test scripts containing the needle `master` do not actually rely on a specific default branch name: either they mention `master` only in a comment, or they initialize that branch specificially, or they do not actually refer to the current default branch. Therefore, the aforementioned modification was undone in those test scripts thusly: $ git checkout HEAD -- \ t/t0027-auto-crlf.sh t/t0060-path-utils.sh \ t/t1011-read-tree-sparse-checkout.sh \ t/t1305-config-include.sh t/t1309-early-config.sh \ t/t1402-check-ref-format.sh t/t1450-fsck.sh \ t/t2024-checkout-dwim.sh \ t/t2106-update-index-assume-unchanged.sh \ t/t3040-subprojects-basic.sh t/t3301-notes.sh \ t/t3308-notes-merge.sh t/t3423-rebase-reword.sh \ t/t3436-rebase-more-options.sh \ t/t4015-diff-whitespace.sh t/t4257-am-interactive.sh \ t/t5323-pack-redundant.sh t/t5401-update-hooks.sh \ t/t5511-refspec.sh t/t5526-fetch-submodules.sh \ t/t5529-push-errors.sh t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh \ t/t5548-push-porcelain.sh \ t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh \ t/t5572-pull-submodule.sh t/t5608-clone-2gb.sh \ t/t5614-clone-submodules-shallow.sh \ t/t7508-status.sh t/t7606-merge-custom.sh \ t/t9302-fast-import-unpack-limit.sh We excluded one set of test scripts in these commands, though: the range of `git p4` tests. The reason? `git p4` stores the (foreign) remote branch in the branch called `p4/master`, which is obviously not the default branch. Manual analysis revealed that only five of these tests actually require a specific default branch name to pass; They were modified thusly: $ sed -i '/^ *\. \.\/lib-git-p4\.sh$/i\ GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME=master\ export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME\ ' t/t980[0167]*.sh t/t9811*.sh Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-11-18 23:44:19 +00:00
export GIT_TEST_DEFAULT_INITIAL_BRANCH_NAME
. ./test-lib.sh
test_expect_success setup '
echo hello-world >file0 &&
git add . &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "initial commit" &&
git checkout -b feature-branch &&
echo another-hello >file1 &&
echo goodbye >file2 &&
git add . &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "second commit" &&
echo final-goodbye >file3 &&
git add . &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "third commit" &&
git checkout -b unrelated-onto-branch main &&
echo unrelated >file4 &&
git add . &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "unrelated commit" &&
git checkout -b related-onto-branch main &&
echo conflicting-change >file2 &&
git add . &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m "related commit" &&
remove_progress_re="$(printf "s/.*\\r//")"
'
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
create_expected_success_apply () {
cat >expected <<-EOF
$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Applying: second commit
Applying: third commit
Applied autostash.
EOF
}
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
create_expected_success_merge () {
q_to_cr >expected <<-EOF
$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
Applied autostash.
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch.
EOF
}
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
create_expected_failure_apply () {
cat >expected <<-EOF
$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it...
Applying: second commit
Applying: third commit
Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
Your changes are safe in the stash.
You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
EOF
}
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
create_expected_failure_merge () {
cat >expected <<-EOF
$(grep "^Created autostash: [0-9a-f][0-9a-f]*\$" actual)
Applying autostash resulted in conflicts.
Your changes are safe in the stash.
You can run "git stash pop" or "git stash drop" at any time.
Successfully rebased and updated refs/heads/rebased-feature-branch.
EOF
}
testrebase () {
type=$1
dotest=$2
test_expect_success "rebase$type: dirty worktree, --no-autostash" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git checkout feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
test_must_fail git rebase$type --no-autostash unrelated-onto-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: dirty worktree, non-conflicting rebase" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
git rebase$type unrelated-onto-branch >actual 2>&1 &&
grep unrelated file4 &&
grep dirty file3 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type --autostash: check output" '
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
suffix=${type#\ --} && suffix=${suffix:-apply} &&
if test ${suffix} = "interactive"; then
suffix=merge
rebase: implement --merge via the interactive machinery As part of an ongoing effort to make rebase have more uniform behavior, modify the merge backend to behave like the interactive one, by re-implementing it on top of the latter. Interactive rebases are implemented in terms of cherry-pick rather than the merge-recursive builtin, but cherry-pick also calls into the recursive merge machinery by default and can accept special merge strategies and/or special strategy options. As such, there really is not any need for having both git-rebase--merge and git-rebase--interactive anymore. Delete git-rebase--merge.sh and instead implement it in builtin/rebase.c. This results in a few deliberate but small user-visible changes: * The progress output is modified (see t3406 and t3420 for examples) * A few known test failures are now fixed (see t3421) * bash-prompt during a rebase --merge is now REBASE-i instead of REBASE-m. Reason: The prompt is a reflection of the backend in use; this allows users to report an issue to the git mailing list with the appropriate backend information, and allows advanced users to know where to search for relevant control files. (see t9903) testcase modification notes: t3406: --interactive and --merge had slightly different progress output while running; adjust a test to match the new expectation t3420: these test precise output while running, but rebase--am, rebase--merge, and rebase--interactive all were built on very different commands (am, merge-recursive, cherry-pick), so the tests expected different output for each type. Now we expect --merge and --interactive to have the same output. t3421: --interactive fixes some bugs in --merge! Wahoo! t9903: --merge uses the interactive backend so the prompt expected is now REBASE-i. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-12-11 16:11:39 +00:00
fi &&
create_expected_success_$suffix &&
sed "$remove_progress_re" <actual >actual2 &&
test_cmp expected actual2
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: dirty index, non-conflicting rebase" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
git add file3 &&
git rebase$type unrelated-onto-branch &&
grep unrelated file4 &&
grep dirty file3 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: conflicting rebase" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
test_must_fail git rebase$type related-onto-branch &&
test_path_is_file $dotest/autostash &&
test_path_is_missing file3 &&
rm -rf $dotest &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: --continue" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
test_must_fail git rebase$type related-onto-branch &&
test_path_is_file $dotest/autostash &&
test_path_is_missing file3 &&
echo "conflicting-plus-goodbye" >file2 &&
git add file2 &&
git rebase --continue &&
test_path_is_missing $dotest/autostash &&
grep dirty file3 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: --skip" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
test_must_fail git rebase$type related-onto-branch &&
test_path_is_file $dotest/autostash &&
test_path_is_missing file3 &&
git rebase --skip &&
test_path_is_missing $dotest/autostash &&
grep dirty file3 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: --abort" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
test_must_fail git rebase$type related-onto-branch &&
test_path_is_file $dotest/autostash &&
test_path_is_missing file3 &&
git rebase --abort &&
test_path_is_missing $dotest/autostash &&
grep dirty file3 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: --quit" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file3 &&
git diff >expect &&
test_must_fail git rebase$type related-onto-branch &&
test_path_is_file $dotest/autostash &&
test_path_is_missing file3 &&
git rebase --quit &&
test_when_finished git stash drop &&
test_path_is_missing $dotest/autostash &&
! grep dirty file3 &&
git stash show -p >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: non-conflicting rebase, conflicting stash" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b rebased-feature-branch feature-branch &&
echo dirty >file4 &&
git add file4 &&
git rebase$type unrelated-onto-branch >actual 2>&1 &&
test_path_is_missing $dotest &&
git reset --hard &&
grep unrelated file4 &&
! grep dirty file4 &&
git checkout feature-branch &&
git stash pop &&
grep dirty file4
'
test_expect_success "rebase$type: check output with conflicting stash" '
test_when_finished git branch -D rebased-feature-branch &&
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
suffix=${type#\ --} && suffix=${suffix:-apply} &&
if test ${suffix} = "interactive"; then
suffix=merge
rebase: implement --merge via the interactive machinery As part of an ongoing effort to make rebase have more uniform behavior, modify the merge backend to behave like the interactive one, by re-implementing it on top of the latter. Interactive rebases are implemented in terms of cherry-pick rather than the merge-recursive builtin, but cherry-pick also calls into the recursive merge machinery by default and can accept special merge strategies and/or special strategy options. As such, there really is not any need for having both git-rebase--merge and git-rebase--interactive anymore. Delete git-rebase--merge.sh and instead implement it in builtin/rebase.c. This results in a few deliberate but small user-visible changes: * The progress output is modified (see t3406 and t3420 for examples) * A few known test failures are now fixed (see t3421) * bash-prompt during a rebase --merge is now REBASE-i instead of REBASE-m. Reason: The prompt is a reflection of the backend in use; this allows users to report an issue to the git mailing list with the appropriate backend information, and allows advanced users to know where to search for relevant control files. (see t9903) testcase modification notes: t3406: --interactive and --merge had slightly different progress output while running; adjust a test to match the new expectation t3420: these test precise output while running, but rebase--am, rebase--merge, and rebase--interactive all were built on very different commands (am, merge-recursive, cherry-pick), so the tests expected different output for each type. Now we expect --merge and --interactive to have the same output. t3421: --interactive fixes some bugs in --merge! Wahoo! t9903: --merge uses the interactive backend so the prompt expected is now REBASE-i. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2018-12-11 16:11:39 +00:00
fi &&
create_expected_failure_$suffix &&
sed "$remove_progress_re" <actual >actual2 &&
test_cmp expected actual2
'
}
test_expect_success "rebase: fast-forward rebase" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b behind-feature-branch feature-branch~1 &&
test_when_finished git branch -D behind-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file1 &&
git rebase feature-branch &&
grep dirty file1 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
test_expect_success "rebase: noop rebase" '
test_config rebase.autostash true &&
git reset --hard &&
git checkout -b same-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_when_finished git branch -D same-feature-branch &&
echo dirty >>file1 &&
git rebase feature-branch &&
grep dirty file1 &&
git checkout feature-branch
'
rebase: rename the two primary rebase backends Two related changes, with separate rationale for each: Rename the 'interactive' backend to 'merge' because: * 'interactive' as a name caused confusion; this backend has been used for many kinds of non-interactive rebases, and will probably be used in the future for more non-interactive rebases than interactive ones given that we are making it the default. * 'interactive' is not the underlying strategy; merging is. * the directory where state is stored is not called .git/rebase-interactive but .git/rebase-merge. Rename the 'am' backend to 'apply' because: * Few users are familiar with git-am as a reference point. * Related to the above, the name 'am' makes sentences in the documentation harder for users to read and comprehend (they may read it as the verb from "I am"); avoiding this difficult places a large burden on anyone writing documentation about this backend to be very careful with quoting and sentence structure and often forces annoying redundancy to try to avoid such problems. * Users stumble over pronunciation ("am" as in "I am a person not a backend" or "am" as in "the first and thirteenth letters in the alphabet in order are "A-M"); this may drive confusion when one user tries to explain to another what they are doing. * While "am" is the tool driving this backend, the tool driving git-am is git-apply, and since we are driving towards lower-level tools for the naming of the merge backend we may as well do so here too. * The directory where state is stored has never been called .git/rebase-am, it was always called .git/rebase-apply. For all the reasons listed above: * Modify the documentation to refer to the backends with the new names * Provide a brief note in the documentation connecting the new names to the old names in case users run across the old names anywhere (e.g. in old release notes or older versions of the documentation) * Change the (new) --am command line flag to --apply * Rename some enums, variables, and functions to reinforce the new backend names for us as well. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2020-02-15 21:36:41 +00:00
testrebase " --apply" .git/rebase-apply
testrebase " --merge" .git/rebase-merge
testrebase " --interactive" .git/rebase-merge
test_expect_success 'abort rebase -i with --autostash' '
test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
echo uncommitted-content >file0 &&
(
write_script abort-editor.sh <<-\EOF &&
echo >"$1"
EOF
test_set_editor "$(pwd)/abort-editor.sh" &&
test_must_fail git rebase -i --autostash HEAD^ &&
rm -f abort-editor.sh
) &&
echo uncommitted-content >expected &&
test_cmp expected file0
'
test_expect_success 'restore autostash on editor failure' '
test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
echo uncommitted-content >file0 &&
(
test_set_editor "false" &&
test_must_fail git rebase -i --autostash HEAD^
) &&
echo uncommitted-content >expected &&
test_cmp expected file0
'
test_expect_success 'autostash is saved on editor failure with conflict' '
test_when_finished "git reset --hard" &&
echo uncommitted-content >file0 &&
(
write_script abort-editor.sh <<-\EOF &&
echo conflicting-content >file0
exit 1
EOF
test_set_editor "$(pwd)/abort-editor.sh" &&
test_must_fail git rebase -i --autostash HEAD^ &&
rm -f abort-editor.sh
) &&
echo conflicting-content >expected &&
test_cmp expected file0 &&
git checkout file0 &&
git stash pop &&
echo uncommitted-content >expected &&
test_cmp expected file0
'
test_expect_success 'autostash with dirty submodules' '
test_when_finished "git reset --hard && git checkout main" &&
git checkout -b with-submodule &&
git submodule add ./ sub &&
test_tick &&
git commit -m add-submodule &&
echo changed >sub/file0 &&
git rebase -i --autostash HEAD
'
test_expect_success 'branch is left alone when possible' '
git checkout -b unchanged-branch &&
echo changed >file0 &&
git rebase --autostash unchanged-branch &&
test changed = "$(cat file0)" &&
test unchanged-branch = "$(git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD)"
'
test_expect_success 'never change active branch' '
git checkout -b not-the-feature-branch unrelated-onto-branch &&
test_when_finished "git reset --hard && git checkout main" &&
echo changed >file0 &&
git rebase --autostash not-the-feature-branch feature-branch &&
test_cmp_rev not-the-feature-branch unrelated-onto-branch
'
test_done