development/git
development/git
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/git/git synced 2024-11-05 18:59:29 +00:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity
git/git-rebase--am.sh

104 lines
2.5 KiB
Bash
Raw Normal View History

remove #!interpreter line from shell libraries In a shell snippet meant to be sourced by other shell scripts, an opening #! line does more harm than good. The harm: - When the shell library is sourced, the interpreter and options from the #! line are not used. Specifying a particular shell can confuse the reader into thinking it is safe for the shell library to rely on idiosyncrasies of that shell. - Using #! instead of a plain comment drops a helpful visual clue that this is a shell library and not a self-contained script. - Tools such as lintian can use a #! line to tell when an installation script has failed by forgetting to set a script executable. This check does not work if shell libraries also start with a #! line. The good: - Text editors notice the #! line and use it for syntax highlighting if you try to edit the installed scripts (without ".sh" suffix) in place. The use of the #! for file type detection is not needed because Git's shell libraries are meant to be edited in source form (with ".sh" suffix). Replace the opening #! lines with comments. This involves tweaking the test harness's valgrind support to find shell libraries by looking for "# " in the first line instead of "#!" (see v1.7.6-rc3~7, 2011-06-17). Suggested by Russ Allbery through lintian. Thanks to Jeff King and Clemens Buchacher for further analysis. Tested by searching for non-executable scripts with #! line: find . -name .git -prune -o -type f -not -executable | while read file do read line <"$file" case $line in '#!'*) echo "$file" ;; esac done The only remaining scripts found are templates for shell scripts (unimplemented.sh, wrap-for-bin.sh) and sample input used in tests (t/t4034/perl/{pre,post}). Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-11-25 21:03:52 +00:00
# This shell script fragment is sourced by git-rebase to implement
# its default, fast, patch-based, non-interactive mode.
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
#
# Copyright (c) 2010 Junio C Hamano.
#
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4) the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that dot-sourced it. The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed. In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function, then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not itself inside a function), control will return from the function that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might follow the dot command inside that function. Commit 99855ddf (first appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command the last line in the function. Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the troublesome "return". The fix in 99855ddf does not address this problem. For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents: run_script2() { . "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh" _e=$? echo only this line should show [ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e return 3 } run_script2 e=$? [ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; } And script2.sh with these contents: if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh' after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell is simply the single line: only this line should show However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output appears instead: should not get here expected status 3 got 1 Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2 function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the "echo always shows" line did not run). These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in script2.sh. If script2.sh is changed to this: main() { if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : } main Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations. We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own function and then calling that as the last line in the script. Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-11 08:28:17 +00:00
# The whole contents of this file is run by dot-sourcing it from
# inside a shell function. It used to be that "return"s we see
# below were not inside any function, and expected to return
# to the function that dot-sourced us.
#
rebase: update comment about FreeBSD /bin/sh Commit 9f50d32 introduced a fix for FreeBSD /bin/sh misbehaviour when dot-sourcing a file containing "return" statements outside of any function, from a function in another shell script. That issue affects FreeBSD 9.x, and is not present in the /bin/sh in FreeBSD 10.3 and later. Update the comment to clarify this. The example from 9f50d32's commit message produces the expected output on FreeBSD 10.3 and -CURRENT (the upcoming 11.0): % sh script1.sh only this line should show % Signed-off-by: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2016-06-17 15:33:29 +00:00
# However, older (9.x) versions of FreeBSD /bin/sh misbehave on such a
# construct and continue to run the statements that follow such a "return".
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4) the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that dot-sourced it. The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed. In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function, then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not itself inside a function), control will return from the function that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might follow the dot command inside that function. Commit 99855ddf (first appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command the last line in the function. Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the troublesome "return". The fix in 99855ddf does not address this problem. For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents: run_script2() { . "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh" _e=$? echo only this line should show [ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e return 3 } run_script2 e=$? [ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; } And script2.sh with these contents: if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh' after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell is simply the single line: only this line should show However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output appears instead: should not get here expected status 3 got 1 Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2 function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the "echo always shows" line did not run). These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in script2.sh. If script2.sh is changed to this: main() { if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : } main Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations. We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own function and then calling that as the last line in the script. Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-11 08:28:17 +00:00
# As a work-around, we introduce an extra layer of a function
# here, and immediately call it after defining it.
git_rebase__am () {
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
case "$action" in
continue)
rebase: add the --gpg-sign option Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-10 01:03:37 +00:00
git am --resolved --resolvemsg="$resolvemsg" \
${gpg_sign_opt:+"$gpg_sign_opt"} &&
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
move_to_original_branch
am: return control to caller, for housekeeping We only need to do these two tasks git gc --auto rm -fr "$dotest" ourselves if the script was invoked as a standalone program; when invoked with --rebasing (from git-rebase--am.sh), cascade control back to the ultimate caller git-rebase.sh to do this for us. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-12 11:56:38 +00:00
return
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
;;
skip)
git-rebase--am: remove unnecessary --3way option Since 22db240 (git-am: propagate --3way options as well, 2008-12-04), the --3way has been propageted across failure, so it is since pointless to pass it to git-am when resuming. Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:58 +00:00
git am --skip --resolvemsg="$resolvemsg" &&
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
move_to_original_branch
am: return control to caller, for housekeeping We only need to do these two tasks git gc --auto rm -fr "$dotest" ourselves if the script was invoked as a standalone program; when invoked with --rebasing (from git-rebase--am.sh), cascade control back to the ultimate caller git-rebase.sh to do this for us. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-12 11:56:38 +00:00
return
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
;;
esac
rebase--am: use --cherry-pick instead of --ignore-if-in-upstream When using `git format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream` we are only allowed to give a single revision range. In the next commit we will want to add an additional exclusion revision in order to handle fork points correctly, so convert `git-rebase--am` to use a symmetric difference with `--cherry-pick --right-only`. This does not change the result of the format-patch invocation, just how we spell the arguments. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-15 19:14:02 +00:00
if test -z "$rebase_root"
# this is now equivalent to ! -z "$upstream"
then
revisions=$upstream...$orig_head
else
revisions=$onto...$orig_head
fi
rebase: extract am code to new source file Extract the code for am-based rebase to git-rebase--am.sh. Suggested-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org> Signed-off-by: Martin von Zweigbergk <martin.von.zweigbergk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2011-02-06 18:43:48 +00:00
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
ret=0
git-rebase: add keep_empty flag Add a command line switch to git-rebase to allow a user the ability to specify that they want to keep any commits in a series that are empty. When git-rebase's type is am, then this option will automatically keep any commit that has a tree object identical to its parent. This patch changes the default behavior of interactive rebases as well. With this patch, git-rebase -i will produce a revision set passed to git-revision-editor, in which empty commits are commented out. Empty commits may be kept manually by uncommenting them. If the new --keep-empty option is used in an interactive rebase the empty commits will automatically all be uncommented in the editor. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-20 14:36:17 +00:00
if test -n "$keep_empty"
then
# we have to do this the hard way. git format-patch completely squashes
# empty commits and even if it didn't the format doesn't really lend
# itself well to recording empty patches. fortunately, cherry-pick
# makes this easy
rebase--am: use --cherry-pick instead of --ignore-if-in-upstream When using `git format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream` we are only allowed to give a single revision range. In the next commit we will want to add an additional exclusion revision in order to handle fork points correctly, so convert `git-rebase--am` to use a symmetric difference with `--cherry-pick --right-only`. This does not change the result of the format-patch invocation, just how we spell the arguments. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-15 19:14:02 +00:00
git cherry-pick ${gpg_sign_opt:+"$gpg_sign_opt"} --allow-empty \
rebase: honor --rerere-autoupdate Rebase accepts '--rerere-autoupdate' as an option but only honors it if '-m' is also given. Fix it for a non-interactive rebase by passing on the option to 'git am' and 'git cherry-pick'. Rework the tests so that they can be used for each rebase flavor and extend them. Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-02 10:44:16 +00:00
$allow_rerere_autoupdate --right-only "$revisions" \
rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-point When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with changes in $upstream..$orig_head. Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode): git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \ $upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the following topology: C --- D --- E <- dev / B <- master@{1} / o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master where: - B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B; - C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict textually if applied in the wrong order; - E depends textually on D. The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C* and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is: o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D (or equivalently D*) results in a conflict. This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten. Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16 19:23:49 +00:00
${restrict_revision+^$restrict_revision}
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
ret=$?
git-rebase: add keep_empty flag Add a command line switch to git-rebase to allow a user the ability to specify that they want to keep any commits in a series that are empty. When git-rebase's type is am, then this option will automatically keep any commit that has a tree object identical to its parent. This patch changes the default behavior of interactive rebases as well. With this patch, git-rebase -i will produce a revision set passed to git-revision-editor, in which empty commits are commented out. Empty commits may be kept manually by uncommenting them. If the new --keep-empty option is used in an interactive rebase the empty commits will automatically all be uncommented in the editor. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-20 14:36:17 +00:00
else
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/rebased-patches"
rebase--am: use --cherry-pick instead of --ignore-if-in-upstream When using `git format-patch --ignore-if-in-upstream` we are only allowed to give a single revision range. In the next commit we will want to add an additional exclusion revision in order to handle fork points correctly, so convert `git-rebase--am` to use a symmetric difference with `--cherry-pick --right-only`. This does not change the result of the format-patch invocation, just how we spell the arguments. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-15 19:14:02 +00:00
git format-patch -k --stdout --full-index --cherry-pick --right-only \
rebase-am: explicitly disable cover-letter If the user has a cover-letter configuration set to anything other than 'false', 'git format-patch' may generate a cover letter, which has no place in "format-patch | am" pipeline. The internal invocation of format-patch must explicitly override the configuration from the command line, just like --src-prefix and other options already do. Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-04-14 22:27:04 +00:00
--src-prefix=a/ --dst-prefix=b/ --no-renames --no-cover-letter \
rebase: turn on progress option by default for format-patch Pass the "--progress" option to format-patch when the standard error stream is connected to the terminal and "--quiet" is not given. Signed-off-by: Kevin Willford <kewillf@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-10 18:32:56 +00:00
$git_format_patch_opt \
rebase: omit patch-identical commits with --fork-point When the `--fork-point` argument was added to `git rebase`, we changed the value of $upstream to be the fork point instead of the point from which we want to rebase. When $orig_head..$upstream is empty this does not change the behaviour, but when there are new changes in the upstream we are no longer checking if any of them are patch-identical with changes in $upstream..$orig_head. Fix this by introducing a new variable to hold the fork point and using this to restrict the range as an extra (negative) revision argument so that the set of desired revisions becomes (in fork-point mode): git rev-list --cherry-pick --right-only \ $upstream...$orig_head ^$fork_point This allows us to correctly handle the scenario where we have the following topology: C --- D --- E <- dev / B <- master@{1} / o --- B' --- C* --- D* <- master where: - B' is a fixed-up version of B that is not patch-identical with B; - C* and D* are patch-identical to C and D respectively and conflict textually if applied in the wrong order; - E depends textually on D. The correct result of `git rebase master dev` is that B is identified as the fork-point of dev and master, so that C, D, E are the commits that need to be replayed onto master; but C and D are patch-identical with C* and D* and so can be dropped, so that the end result is: o --- B' --- C* --- D* --- E <- dev If the fork-point is not identified, then picking B onto a branch containing B' results in a conflict and if the patch-identical commits are not correctly identified then picking C onto a branch containing D (or equivalently D*) results in a conflict. This change allows us to handle both of these cases, where previously we either identified the fork-point (with `--fork-point`) but not the patch-identical commits *or* (with `--no-fork-point`) identified the patch-identical commits but not the fact that master had been rewritten. Reported-by: Ted Felix <ted@tedfelix.com> Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-07-16 19:23:49 +00:00
"$revisions" ${restrict_revision+^$restrict_revision} \
>"$GIT_DIR/rebased-patches"
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
ret=$?
if test 0 != $ret
then
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/rebased-patches"
case "$head_name" in
refs/heads/*)
git checkout -q "$head_name"
;;
*)
git checkout -q "$orig_head"
;;
esac
cat >&2 <<-EOF
git encountered an error while preparing the patches to replay
these revisions:
$revisions
As a result, git cannot rebase them.
EOF
rebase: return non-zero error code if format-patch fails Since e481af06 (rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails) we notice if format-patch fails and return immediately from git-rebase--am. We save the return value with ret=$?, but then we return $?, which is usually zero in this case. Fix this by returning $ret instead. Cc: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Clemens Buchacher <clemens.buchacher@intel.com> Helped-by: Jorge Nunes <jorge.nunes@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2015-07-02 09:11:33 +00:00
return $ret
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
fi
rebase: add the --gpg-sign option Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-10 01:03:37 +00:00
git am $git_am_opt --rebasing --resolvemsg="$resolvemsg" \
rebase: honor --rerere-autoupdate Rebase accepts '--rerere-autoupdate' as an option but only honors it if '-m' is also given. Fix it for a non-interactive rebase by passing on the option to 'git am' and 'git cherry-pick'. Rework the tests so that they can be used for each rebase flavor and extend them. Reported-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2017-08-02 10:44:16 +00:00
$allow_rerere_autoupdate \
rebase: add the --gpg-sign option Signed-off-by: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org> Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-02-10 01:03:37 +00:00
${gpg_sign_opt:+"$gpg_sign_opt"} <"$GIT_DIR/rebased-patches"
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
ret=$?
rm -f "$GIT_DIR/rebased-patches"
fi
if test 0 != $ret
then
test -d "$state_dir" && write_basic_state
am: return control to caller, for housekeeping We only need to do these two tasks git gc --auto rm -fr "$dotest" ourselves if the script was invoked as a standalone program; when invoked with --rebasing (from git-rebase--am.sh), cascade control back to the ultimate caller git-rebase.sh to do this for us. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2013-05-12 11:56:38 +00:00
return $ret
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
fi
git-rebase: add keep_empty flag Add a command line switch to git-rebase to allow a user the ability to specify that they want to keep any commits in a series that are empty. When git-rebase's type is am, then this option will automatically keep any commit that has a tree object identical to its parent. This patch changes the default behavior of interactive rebases as well. With this patch, git-rebase -i will produce a revision set passed to git-revision-editor, in which empty commits are commented out. Empty commits may be kept manually by uncommenting them. If the new --keep-empty option is used in an interactive rebase the empty commits will automatically all be uncommented in the editor. Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-04-20 14:36:17 +00:00
rebase: Handle cases where format-patch fails 'format-patch' could fail due to reasons such as out of memory. Such failures are not detected or handled, which causes rebase to incorrectly think that it completed successfully and continue with cleanup. i.e. calling move_to_original_branch Instead of using a pipe, we separate 'format-patch' and 'am' by using an intermediate file. This gurantees that we can invoke 'am' with the complete input, or not invoking 'am' at all if 'format-patch' failed. Also remove the use of '&&' at the end of the if-block, and rearrange the 'write_basic_state' and 'move_to_original_branch' to make the logic flow a bit better and easier to read. Signed-off-by: Andrew Wong <andrew.kw.w@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2012-10-11 03:54:03 +00:00
move_to_original_branch
rebase: avoid non-function use of "return" on FreeBSD Since a1549e10, 15d4bf2e and 01a1e646 (first appearing in v1.8.4) the git-rebase--*.sh scripts have used a "return" to stop execution of the dot-sourced file and return to the "dot" command that dot-sourced it. The /bin/sh utility on FreeBSD however behaves poorly under some circumstances when such a "return" is executed. In particular, if the "dot" command is contained within a function, then when a "return" is executed by the script it runs (that is not itself inside a function), control will return from the function that contains the "dot" command skipping any statements that might follow the dot command inside that function. Commit 99855ddf (first appearing in v1.8.4.1) addresses this by making the "dot" command the last line in the function. Unfortunately the FreeBSD /bin/sh may also execute some statements in the script run by the "dot" command that appear after the troublesome "return". The fix in 99855ddf does not address this problem. For example, if you have script1.sh with these contents: run_script2() { . "$(dirname -- "$0")/script2.sh" _e=$? echo only this line should show [ $_e -eq 5 ] || echo expected status 5 got $_e return 3 } run_script2 e=$? [ $e -eq 3 ] || { echo expected status 3 got $e; exit 1; } And script2.sh with these contents: if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : When running script1.sh (e.g. '/bin/sh script1.sh' or './script1.sh' after making it executable), the expected output from a POSIX shell is simply the single line: only this line should show However, when run using FreeBSD's /bin/sh, the following output appears instead: should not get here expected status 3 got 1 Not only did the lines following the "dot" command in the run_script2 function in script1.sh get skipped, but additional lines in script2.sh following the "return" got executed -- but not all of them (e.g. the "echo always shows" line did not run). These issues can be avoided by not using a top-level "return" in script2.sh. If script2.sh is changed to this: main() { if [ 5 -gt 3 ]; then return 5 fi case bad in *) echo always shows esac echo should not get here ! : } main Then it behaves the same when using FreeBSD's /bin/sh as when using other more POSIX compliant /bin/sh implementations. We fix the git-rebase--*.sh scripts in a similar fashion by moving the top-level code that contains "return" statements into its own function and then calling that as the last line in the script. Signed-off-by: Kyle J. McKay <mackyle@gmail.com> Acked-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
2014-04-11 08:28:17 +00:00
}
# ... and then we call the whole thing.
git_rebase__am
Reference in a new issue Copy permalink