git/t/chainlint/chain-break-status.expect

OUT=$(( ( large_git ; echo $? 1 >& 3 ) | : ) 3 >& 1) &&
test_match_signal 13 "$OUT" &&

{ test-tool sigchain > actual ; ret=$? ; } &&
{
	test_match_signal 15 "$ret" ||
	test "$ret" = 3
} &&
test_cmp expect actual
chainlint.pl: don't flag broken &&-chain if `$?` handled explicitly There are cases in which tests capture and check a command's exit code explicitly without employing test_expect_code(). They do so by intentionally breaking the &&-chain since it would be impossible to capture "$?" in the failing case if the `status=$?` assignment was part of the &&-chain. Since such constructs are manually checking the exit code, their &&-chain breakage is legitimate and safe, thus should not be flagged. Therefore, stop flagging &&-chain breakage in such cases. Signed-off-by: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> 2022-09-01 00:29:48 +00:00			`OUT=$(( ( large_git ; echo $? 1 >& 3 ) \| : ) 3 >& 1) &&`
			`test_match_signal 13 "$OUT" &&`

			`{ test-tool sigchain > actual ; ret=$? ; } &&`
			`{`
			`test_match_signal 15 "$ret" \|\|`
			`test "$ret" = 3`
			`} &&`
			`test_cmp expect actual`