This PR is to update material_color_utilities package version to the latest. `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_fruit_salad.dart` and `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_rainbow.dart` are exported after version 0.9.0.
Once this PR is merged, we don't need to explicitly import these two files like the change in PR #144805, which breaks some dependencies in `Google testing`.
* Adds support for `flutter test --wasm`.
* The test compilation flow is a bit different now, so that it supports compilers other than DDC. Specifically, when we run a set of unit tests, we generate a "switchboard" main function that imports each unit test and runs the main function for a specific one based off of a value set by the JS bootstrapping code. This way, there is one compile step and the same compile output is invoked for each unit test file.
* Also, removes all references to `dart:html` from flutter/flutter.
* Adds CI steps for running the framework unit tests with dart2wasm+skwasm
* These steps are marked as `bringup: true`, so we don't know what kind of failures they will result in. Any failures they have will not block the tree at all yet while we're still in `bringup: true`. Once this PR is merged, I plan on looking at any failures and either fixing them or disabling them so we can get these CI steps running on presubmit.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126692
This pull request is part of the effort to solve issue #144903.
In the past, my efforts to reduce line length involved refactoring away from switch statements, but unlike [yesterday's PR](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144905), this one is full of switch statements that make things more concise!
Reverts: flutter/flutter#144706
Initiated by: gspencergoog
Reason for reverting: This has broken the tree because some tests are still failing post completion. This particular one looks like it might have to do with a gold image not existing.
Original PR Author: goderbauer
Reviewed By: {Piinks}
This change reverts the following previous change:
A test was failing silently because of this (see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144353 and fixed in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144709). The failure went undetected for months. Ideally, this should have been a regular non-silent failure. This change makes that so. `package:test` can properly handle reported exceptions outside of test cases. With this change, the test fails as follows:
```
00:03 +82: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
══╡ EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY FLUTTER TEST FRAMEWORK ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following assertion was thrown running a test (but after the test had completed):
setState() called after dispose(): _DynamicColorExampleState#1cd37(lifecycle state: defunct, not
mounted)
This error happens if you call setState() on a State object for a widget that no longer appears in
the widget tree (e.g., whose parent widget no longer includes the widget in its build). This error
can occur when code calls setState() from a timer or an animation callback.
The preferred solution is to cancel the timer or stop listening to the animation in the dispose()
callback. Another solution is to check the "mounted" property of this object before calling
setState() to ensure the object is still in the tree.
This error might indicate a memory leak if setState() is being called because another object is
retaining a reference to this State object after it has been removed from the tree. To avoid memory
leaks, consider breaking the reference to this object during dispose().
When the exception was thrown, this was the stack:
#0 State.setState.<anonymous closure> (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1167:9)
#1 State.setState (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1202:6)
#2 _DynamicColorExampleState._updateImage (package:flutter_api_samples/material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart:191:5)
<asynchronous suspension>
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/context_menu/context_menu_controller.0.dart
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart [E]
Test failed. See exception logs above.
The test description was: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
This test failed after it had already completed.
Make sure to use a matching library which informs the test runner
of pending async work.
```
A test was failing silently because of this (see
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144353 and fixed in
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144709). The failure went
undetected for months. Ideally, this should have been a regular
non-silent failure. This change makes that so. `package:test` can
properly handle reported exceptions outside of test cases. With this
change, the test fails as follows:
```
00:03 +82: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
══╡ EXCEPTION CAUGHT BY FLUTTER TEST FRAMEWORK ╞════════════════════════════════════════════════════
The following assertion was thrown running a test (but after the test had completed):
setState() called after dispose(): _DynamicColorExampleState#1cd37(lifecycle state: defunct, not
mounted)
This error happens if you call setState() on a State object for a widget that no longer appears in
the widget tree (e.g., whose parent widget no longer includes the widget in its build). This error
can occur when code calls setState() from a timer or an animation callback.
The preferred solution is to cancel the timer or stop listening to the animation in the dispose()
callback. Another solution is to check the "mounted" property of this object before calling
setState() to ensure the object is still in the tree.
This error might indicate a memory leak if setState() is being called because another object is
retaining a reference to this State object after it has been removed from the tree. To avoid memory
leaks, consider breaking the reference to this object during dispose().
When the exception was thrown, this was the stack:
#0 State.setState.<anonymous closure> (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1167:9)
#1 State.setState (package:flutter/src/widgets/framework.dart:1202:6)
#2 _DynamicColorExampleState._updateImage (package:flutter_api_samples/material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart:191:5)
<asynchronous suspension>
════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/context_menu/context_menu_controller.0.dart
00:03 +81 -1: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart [E]
Test failed. See exception logs above.
The test description was: Smoke test material/color_scheme/dynamic_content_color.0.dart
This test failed after it had already completed.
Make sure to use a matching library which informs the test runner
of pending async work.
```
## Description
This PRs changes the default value for the `platform` parameter used to simulate key events.
With this PR, the default value is "web" on web, otherwise it is the operating system name retrieved from `defaultTargetPlatform`.
Previously, for methods in `WidgetController`, it defaulted to âwebâ on web, and âandroidâ everywhere else. And for methods in `KeyEventSimulator` it defaulted to âwebâ on web, and the operating system that the test was running on everywhere else. Because the operating system was based on `Platform.operatingSystem`, it usually differed from the target platform the test was running on.
AFAIK, the `platform` parameter is only meaningful for simulating `RawKeyEvent`. Once `RawKeyboard` will be fully removed, the `platform` parameter wonât be needed.
@gspencergoog In the meantime, do you think it is worth merging this fix?
## Related Issue
Fixes to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/133955
## Tests
Adds one test.
## Description
This PRs changes the default value transit mode for key event simulation.
The default transit mode for key event simulation is currently `KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData` while on the framework side `KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData` is the preferred transit mode.
`KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData` is more accurate and can help detect issues.
For instance the following test will fail with `KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData` because raw keyboard logic for modifier keys is less accurate:
```dart
testWidgets('Press control left once', (WidgetTester tester) async {
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData;
final List<KeyEvent> events = <KeyEvent>[];
final FocusNode focusNode = FocusNode();
addTearDown(focusNode.dispose);
await tester.pumpWidget(
Focus(
focusNode: focusNode,
autofocus: true,
onKeyEvent: (_, KeyEvent event) {
events.add(event);
return KeyEventResult.handled;
},
child: Container(),
),
);
await simulateKeyDownEvent(LogicalKeyboardKey.controlLeft);
// This will fail when transit mode is KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData
// because a down event for controlRight is synthesized.
expect(events.length, 1);
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = null;
});
```
And the following this test is ok with `KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData` but rightly fails with `KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData`:
```dart
testWidgets('Simulates consecutive key down events', (WidgetTester tester) async {
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData;
// Simulating several key down events without key up in between is tolerated
// when transit mode is KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData, it will trigger an
// assert on KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData.
await simulateKeyDownEvent(LogicalKeyboardKey.arrowDown);
await simulateKeyDownEvent(LogicalKeyboardKey.arrowDown);
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = null;
});
```
## Related Issue
Related to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143845
## Tests
Adds two tests.
Originally, my aim was just to refactor (as per usual), but while messing around with the `TableBorder.symmetric` constructor, I realized that `borderRadius` was missing!
This pull request makes a few class constructors more efficient, and it fixes#144277 by adding the missing parameter.
<br>
Reverts flutter/flutter#144001
Initiated by: Piinks
Reason for reverting: Failing goldens at the tip of tree
Original PR Author: QuncCccccc
Reviewed By: {HansMuller}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Reverts flutter/flutter#143973
This is a reland for #138521 with an updated g3fix(cl/605555997). Local test: cl/609608958.
This pull request fixes#143803 by taking advantage of Dart's null-aware operators.
And unlike `switch` expressions ([9 PRs](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/143634) and counting), the Flutter codebase is already fantastic when it comes to null-aware coding. After refactoring the entire repo, all the changes involving `?.` and `??` can fit into a single pull request.
This PR implements the functionality described above and hides it behind
the `--experimental-faster-testing` flag of `flutter test`.
### The following are some performance measurements from test runs
conducted on GitHub Actions
run 1 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/1
run 2 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/2
run 3 logs:
https://github.com/derekxu16/flutter_test_ci/actions/runs/8008029772/attempts/3
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/animation
test/foundation` step**
run 1: 54s
run 2: 52s
run 3: 56s
average: 54s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/animation test/foundation` step**
run 1: 27s
run 2: 27s
run 3: 29s
average: 27.67s (~48.77% shorter than 54s)
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/animation
test/foundation test/gestures test/painting test/physics test/rendering
test/scheduler test/semantics test/services` step**
run 1: 260s
run 2: 270s
run 3: 305s
average: 278.33s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/animation test/foundation test/gestures
test/painting test/physics test/rendering test/scheduler test/semantics
test/services` step**
from a clean build (right after deleting the build folder):
run 1: 215s
run 2: 227s
run 3: 245s
average: 229s (~17.72% shorter than 278.33s)
Note that in reality, `test/material` was not passed to `flutter test`
in the trials below. All of the test files under `test/material` except
for `test/material/icons_test.dart` were listed out individually
**length of `flutter test --reporter=expanded test/material` step**
run 1: 408s
run 2: 421s
run 3: 451s
average: 426.67s
**length of `flutter test --experimental-faster-testing
--reporter=expanded test/material` step**
run 1: 382s
run 2: 373s
run 3: 400s
average: 385s (~9.77% shorter than 426.67s)
---------
Co-authored-by: Dan Field <dnfield@google.com>
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143405.
It was counter-intuitive that a SemanticsFinder without specifying a FlutterView would only search the nodes in the default view. This change makes it so that when no view is specified the semantics trees of all known FlutterViews are searched.
Reverts flutter/flutter#143386
Initiated by: Piinks
Reason for reverting: This broke a customer test.
Original PR Author: Piinks
Reviewed By: {goderbauer}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143173
The `start` and `end` parameters of `SemanticsController.simulatedAccessibilityTraversal` were deprecated in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/112413, but no tests were added that verified the new API. 😳
This change
- fixes a typo in an error message
- fixes the new `startNode` and `endNode` not being accounted for in setting the traversal range
- adds dart fixes for the deprecations
- adds tests for the new API that is meant to replace the deprecated one.
- Filed https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143405 to follow up on the new API not working in multiple views.
Reverts flutter/flutter#143334
Initiated by: hangyujin
Reason for reverting: broke g3 tests
Original PR Author: hangyujin
Reviewed By: {LongCatIsLooong}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
Add a semantics flag to text field to fix https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143337 (in IOS the disabled text field is not read `dimmed`)
internal: b/322345393
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143173
The `start` and `end` parameters of `SemanticsController.simulatedAccessibilityTraversal` were deprecated in https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/112413, but no tests were added that verified the new API. ð³
This change
- fixes a typo in an error message
- fixes the new `startNode` and `endNode` not being accounted for in setting the traversal range
- adds dart fixes for the deprecations
- adds tests for the new API that is meant to replace the deprecated one.
- Filed https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143405 to follow up on the new API not working in multiple views.
During golden test image comparison 2 lists of a different type are compared with the method "identical", so this will never be true. The test image is a _Uint8ArrayView while the master image is an Uint8List. So that results in always a heavy computation to get the difference between the test and the master image.
When you run this test snippet I go from 51 seconds to 14 seconds:
```dart
import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:flutter_test/flutter_test.dart';
void main() {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
testWidgets('Small test', (WidgetTester tester) async {
await tester.pumpWidget(Directionality(textDirection: TextDirection.ltr, child: Text('jo')));
await expectLater(find.byType(Text), matchesGoldenFile('main.png'));
});
}
}
```
Update the `matchesGoldenFile()` / `LocalComparisonOutput` code to generate failure images for golden tests that fail when the image sizes do not match. This can make it far quicker to identify what is wrong with the test image.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/141488
- [ x I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features we expect every widget to implement].
Reverts flutter/flutter#142339
In the original change one of the tests included the same view twice which resulted in a different failure than the expected one. The second commit contains the fix for this. I don't understand how this wasn't caught presubmit on CI.
Reverts flutter/flutter#141484
Initiated by: eliasyishak
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
The existing `runApp` bootstraps the widget tree and renders the provided widget into the default view (which is currently the implicit View from `PlatformDispatcher.implicitView` and - in the future - may be a default-created window). Apps, that want more control over the View they are rendered in, need a new way to bootstrap the widget tree: `runWidget`. It does not make any assumptions about the View the provided widget is rendered into. Instead, it is up to the caller to include a View widget in the provided widget tree that specifies where content should be rendered. In the future, this may enable developers to create a custom window for their app instead of relying on the default-created one.
The existing `runApp` bootstraps the widget tree and renders the provided widget into the default view (which is currently the implicit View from `PlatformDispatcher.implicitView` and - in the future - may be a default-created window). Apps, that want more control over the View they are rendered in, need a new way to bootstrap the widget tree: `runWidget`. It does not make any assumptions about the View the provided widget is rendered into. Instead, it is up to the caller to include a View widget in the provided widget tree that specifies where content should be rendered. In the future, this may enable developers to create a custom window for their app instead of relying on the default-created one.
When a `TextField` is rendered before a `Navigator`, it breaks in semantics mode. This is because the framework generates the incorrect semantics tree (excludes the TextField) and when that tree gets sent to the engine, we don't get the signal to create the corresponding `<input>` element.
This happens for a few reasons:
* `ModalBarrier` uses `BlockSemantics` to drop the semantics of routes beneath the current route in `Navigator`
* `ModalBarrier` mistakenly recognizes the widget outside of the `Navigator` to be its sibling
* So we end up dropping the semantics node of the `TextField` rendered before it.
The fix is to let `Navigator` generate a semantics node so that `ModalBarrier` doesn't mistakenly think widgets outside of `Navigator` are its siblings.
`Navigator` doesn't currently do this, which causes all the nodes generated from its widget subtree to be directly attached to the parent semantics node above `Navigator` - since this is also the parent of `TextField`, it considers them siblings.
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/129324
