## Description
This PRs changes the default value transit mode for key event simulation.
The default transit mode for key event simulation is currently `KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData` while on the framework side `KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData` is the preferred transit mode.
`KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData` is more accurate and can help detect issues.
For instance the following test will fail with `KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData` because raw keyboard logic for modifier keys is less accurate:
```dart
testWidgets('Press control left once', (WidgetTester tester) async {
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData;
final List<KeyEvent> events = <KeyEvent>[];
final FocusNode focusNode = FocusNode();
addTearDown(focusNode.dispose);
await tester.pumpWidget(
Focus(
focusNode: focusNode,
autofocus: true,
onKeyEvent: (_, KeyEvent event) {
events.add(event);
return KeyEventResult.handled;
},
child: Container(),
),
);
await simulateKeyDownEvent(LogicalKeyboardKey.controlLeft);
// This will fail when transit mode is KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData
// because a down event for controlRight is synthesized.
expect(events.length, 1);
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = null;
});
```
And the following this test is ok with `KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData` but rightly fails with `KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData`:
```dart
testWidgets('Simulates consecutive key down events', (WidgetTester tester) async {
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData;
// Simulating several key down events without key up in between is tolerated
// when transit mode is KeyDataTransitMode.rawKeyData, it will trigger an
// assert on KeyDataTransitMode.keyDataThenRawKeyData.
await simulateKeyDownEvent(LogicalKeyboardKey.arrowDown);
await simulateKeyDownEvent(LogicalKeyboardKey.arrowDown);
debugKeyEventSimulatorTransitModeOverride = null;
});
```
## Related Issue
Related to https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143845
## Tests
Adds two tests.
`DevFSBytesContent` (and it's descendant `DevFSStringContent`) have setters that change the underlying content. These are unused outside of tests, so this PR removes them. Amongst other things, this could help me refactor https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144660 into something that has fewer pitfalls.
This is purely a refactoring.
We should always target the newest, and 34 is the newest. This isn't a requirement yet (like it is for 33+) but presumably it will be made required in the nearish future.
I was doing some debugging on a RenderSliver subclass, and found
that SliverConstraints.toString was missing the precedingScrollExtent
field.
Add that, and add both that field and userScrollDirection to the
`==` and hashCode implementations, which had been skipping them,
so that all three methods now handle all the class's fields.
Partial implementation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
This enables asset transformation during hot reload (except for web, because that has its own implementation of `DevFS` ð). Asset transformers will be reapplied after changing any asset and performing a hot reload during `flutter run`.
Explicitly handle the case where the iOS device is not paired. On `flutter run` show an error and bail instead of trying and failing to launch on the device.
On this PR:
```
$ flutter run -d 00008110-0009588C2651401E
'iPhone' is not paired. Open Xcode and trust this computer when prompted.
$
```
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144447
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144095
Originally, my aim was just to refactor (as per usual), but while messing around with the `TableBorder.symmetric` constructor, I realized that `borderRadius` was missing!
This pull request makes a few class constructors more efficient, and it fixes#144277 by adding the missing parameter.
<br>
This is for https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/127803: a text field should unregister from the scribble scope, when it becomes unfocusable.
When a `FocusNode` has listeners and its `_canRequestFocus` flag is set to true, it adds `+1` to `_focusabilityListeningDescendantCount` of all ancestors until it reaches the first ancestor with `descendantsAreFocusable = false`. When the a `FocusNode`'s `descendantsAreFocusable` changes, all listeners that contributed to its `_focusabilityListeningDescendantCount` will be notified.
## Description
This PR simplifies one external link in a commented section of the Android manifest template.
## Related Issue
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144249
## Tests
Documentation only PR.
I was talking with @tvolkert about the complex behavior of Shortcuts when a text field is focused. I created [this dartpad](https://dartpad.dev/?id=0b5c08fa85637422baa84927b7f1ee5f) to illustrate the problem, which shows a key being stolen from a text field by Shortcuts, and how to prevent that using DoNothingAndStopPropagationIntent.
This PR adds a section in the docs explaining how all of this works and how to override this "stealing" problem.
This allows relanding https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51056. The patch introduced a change where a static member is initialized from `View.generateViewId()` instead of conditionally using that API. Without an implementation for that in android.jar, the test will fail. The test in here currently is using a fake implementation that creates errors seen below.
See https://logs.chromium.org/logs/flutter/buildbucket/cr-buildbucket/8754827734484522225/+/u/run_plugin_test/stdout#L46564_2 for failure. More detailed failure information is available locally in the `build` folder:
```
Mockito cannot mock this class: class io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity.
If you're not sure why you're getting this error, please open an issue on GitHub.
Java : 17
JVM vendor name : JetBrains s.r.o.
JVM vendor version : 17.0.7+0-17.0.7b1000.6-10550314
JVM name : OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM
JVM version : 17.0.7+0-17.0.7b1000.6-10550314
JVM info : mixed mode
OS name : Mac OS X
OS version : 14.3.1
You are seeing this disclaimer because Mockito is configured to create inlined mocks.
You can learn about inline mocks and their limitations under item #39 of the Mockito class javadoc.
Underlying exception : org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: Cannot instrument class io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity because it or one of its supertypes could not be initialized
at app//dev.flutter.plugins.integration_test.FlutterDeviceScreenshotTest.getFlutterView_returnsFlutterViewForFlutterActivity(FlutterDeviceScreenshotTest.java:32)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at app//org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod$1.runReflectiveCall(FrameworkMethod.java:59)
at app//org.junit.internal.runners.model.ReflectiveCallable.run(ReflectiveCallable.java:12)
at app//org.junit.runners.model.FrameworkMethod.invokeExplosively(FrameworkMethod.java:56)
at app//org.junit.internal.runners.statements.InvokeMethod.evaluate(InvokeMethod.java:17)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at app//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner$1.evaluate(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:100)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runLeaf(ParentRunner.java:366)
at app//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:103)
at app//org.junit.runners.BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.runChild(BlockJUnit4ClassRunner.java:63)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$4.run(ParentRunner.java:331)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$1.schedule(ParentRunner.java:79)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.runChildren(ParentRunner.java:329)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.access$100(ParentRunner.java:66)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$2.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:293)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner$3.evaluate(ParentRunner.java:306)
at app//org.junit.runners.ParentRunner.run(ParentRunner.java:413)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.runTestClass(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:110)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:58)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.JUnitTestClassExecutor.execute(JUnitTestClassExecutor.java:38)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.junit.AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(AbstractJUnitTestClassProcessor.java:62)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.SuiteTestClassProcessor.processTestClass(SuiteTestClassProcessor.java:51)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.base@17.0.7/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:36)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ReflectionDispatch.dispatch(ReflectionDispatch.java:24)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ContextClassLoaderDispatch.dispatch(ContextClassLoaderDispatch.java:33)
at org.gradle.internal.dispatch.ProxyDispatchAdapter$DispatchingInvocationHandler.invoke(ProxyDispatchAdapter.java:94)
at jdk.proxy1/jdk.proxy1.$Proxy2.processTestClass(Unknown Source)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker$2.run(TestWorker.java:176)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.executeAndMaintainThreadName(TestWorker.java:129)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:100)
at org.gradle.api.internal.tasks.testing.worker.TestWorker.execute(TestWorker.java:60)
at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.ActionExecutionWorker.execute(ActionExecutionWorker.java:56)
at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:133)
at org.gradle.process.internal.worker.child.SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.call(SystemApplicationClassLoaderWorker.java:71)
at app//worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.run(GradleWorkerMain.java:69)
at app//worker.org.gradle.process.internal.worker.GradleWorkerMain.main(GradleWorkerMain.java:74)
Caused by: org.mockito.exceptions.base.MockitoException: Cannot instrument class io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity because it or one of its supertypes could not be initialized
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:168)
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:399)
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:190)
at app//net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:410)
... 44 more
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: Method generateViewId in android.view.View not mocked. See http://g.co/androidstudio/not-mocked for details.
at android.view.View.generateViewId(View.java)
at io.flutter.embedding.android.FlutterActivity.<clinit>(FlutterActivity.java:218)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.Class.forName(Unknown Source)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineBytecodeGenerator.assureInitialization(InlineBytecodeGenerator.java:236)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineBytecodeGenerator.triggerRetransformation(InlineBytecodeGenerator.java:261)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineBytecodeGenerator.mockClass(InlineBytecodeGenerator.java:218)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.lambda$mockClass$0(TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.java:47)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:168)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:399)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:190)
at net.bytebuddy.TypeCache$WithInlineExpunction.findOrInsert(TypeCache.java:410)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.mockClass(TypeCachingBytecodeGenerator.java:40)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.createMockType(InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.java:396)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.doCreateMock(InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.java:355)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(InlineDelegateByteBuddyMockMaker.java:334)
at org.mockito.internal.creation.bytebuddy.InlineByteBuddyMockMaker.createMock(InlineByteBuddyMockMaker.java:56)
at org.mockito.internal.util.MockUtil.createMock(MockUtil.java:99)
at org.mockito.internal.MockitoCore.mock(MockitoCore.java:88)
at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:2087)
at org.mockito.Mockito.mock(Mockito.java:2002)
... 44 more
```
This PR removes an irrelevant comment in `TextPainter` for `_computePaintOffsetFraction`. Also some typos are corrected and missing spaces/newlines added.
test-exempt: no functional change
Reverts flutter/flutter#144207
Initiated by: CaseyHillers
Reason for reverting: b/327301206 - Breaking a customer test
Original PR Author: LongCatIsLooong
Reviewed By: {gspencergoog}
This change reverts the following previous change:
Original Description:
`FocusNode.canRequestFocus` was doing a double traversal if no ancestor disallows focus. The last for loop only has to reach as far as the enclosing scope.
Also this caches the `FocusNode.enclosingScope` since the getter access happens much more frequently than node reparenting.
