This PR is to update material_color_utilities package version to the latest. `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_fruit_salad.dart` and `material_color_utilities/scheme/scheme_rainbow.dart` are exported after version 0.9.0.
Once this PR is merged, we don't need to explicitly import these two files like the change in PR #144805, which breaks some dependencies in `Google testing`.
This PR is a follow-up of a previous PR of mine:
https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/141417. It was unfinished, i.e.
I only implemented it and used it in `examples/hello_world`. No "flutter
create" templates were modified.
This change is theoretically breaking, but in practice, I am pretty sure
nobody uses this. It was not accounced anywhere, the only app using it
is `examples/hello_world`. I did not do that (that=update docs and
templates) because I wanted a solution that is idiomatic in both Gradle
and Kotlin, and only now I found time to do this.
### Without this change
```groovy
defaultConfig {
applicationId = "io.flutter.examples.hello_world"
minSdk = flutter.minSdkVersion
targetSdk = flutter.targetSdkVersion
versionCode = flutter.versionCode()
versionName = flutter.versionName()
}
```
### With this change
```groovy
defaultConfig {
applicationId = "io.flutter.examples.hello_world"
minSdk = flutter.minSdkVersion
targetSdk = flutter.targetSdkVersion
versionCode = flutter.versionCode
versionName = flutter.versionName
}
```
Idiomatic getter - yay! It's consistent between assignment of all four
props.
### Issue
fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/146067
## Pre-launch Checklist
- [x] I read the [Contributor Guide] and followed the process outlined
there for submitting PRs.
- [x] I read the [Tree Hygiene] wiki page, which explains my
responsibilities.
- [x] I read and followed the [Flutter Style Guide], including [Features
we expect every widget to implement].
- [x] I signed the [CLA].
- [x] I listed at least one issue that this PR fixes in the description
above.
- [x] I updated/added relevant documentation (doc comments with `///`).
- [x] I added new tests to check the change I am making, or this PR is
[test-exempt].
- [x] I followed the [breaking change policy] and added [Data Driven
Fixes] where supported.
- [x] All existing and new tests are passing.
---------
Co-authored-by: Reid Baker <reidbaker@google.com>
Fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144454
For reference, after formatting it looks like:
```
ââ Flutter Fix âââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
â [!] Your project requires a newer version of the Kotlin Gradle plugin. â
â Find the latest version on https://kotlinlang.org/docs/releases.html#release-details, then update the â
â version number of the plugin with id "org.jetbrains.kotlin.android" in the plugins block of â
â /Users/mackall/development/BugTesting/ELIMINATEME/blah/android/settings.gradle. â
â â
â Alternatively (if your project was created before Flutter 3.19), update â
â /Users/mackall/development/BugTesting/ELIMINATEME/blah/android/build.gradle â
â ext.kotlin_version = '<latest-version>' â
ââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââââ
```
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
This PR makes hot reloads reflect changes to transformer configurations under the `assets` section in pubspec.yaml.
This PR is optimized for ease of implementation, and should not be merged as-is. If it is merged as-is, seriously consider creating a tech debt issue and assigning it to someone to make sure it gets resolved.
There are two issues in the previous implementation:
1. `_populateDevices` will return the devices from `deviceNotifier` if it had been initialized, assuming that once it's initialized, it has been properly populated. That assumption is not true because calling getters like `onAdded` would initialize `deviceNotifier` without populating it.
2. `deviceNotifier` instance might be replaced in some cases, causing `onAdded` subscribers to lose any future updates.
To fix (1), this commit added the `isPopulated` field in `deviceNotifier` as a more accurate flag to determine if we need to populate it.
To fix (2), this commit made `deviceNotifier` a final member in `PolingDeviceDiscovery`.
* Adds support for `flutter test --wasm`.
* The test compilation flow is a bit different now, so that it supports compilers other than DDC. Specifically, when we run a set of unit tests, we generate a "switchboard" main function that imports each unit test and runs the main function for a specific one based off of a value set by the JS bootstrapping code. This way, there is one compile step and the same compile output is invoked for each unit test file.
* Also, removes all references to `dart:html` from flutter/flutter.
* Adds CI steps for running the framework unit tests with dart2wasm+skwasm
* These steps are marked as `bringup: true`, so we don't know what kind of failures they will result in. Any failures they have will not block the tree at all yet while we're still in `bringup: true`. Once this PR is merged, I plan on looking at any failures and either fixing them or disabling them so we can get these CI steps running on presubmit.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/126692
Pre work for https://github.com/flutter/engine/pull/51229. Removes a lot of code referencing v1 of the android embedding, though not necessarily all of it (I may have missed some, it is hard to know).
Will hopefully make landing that PR less painful (or maybe painless?)
A ProxiedDevice has two port forwarder, one to forward remote host port and another to forward remote device port. During an attach workflow, the port was forwarded by the latter. Update ProxiedDDS to make sure that it works in such case.
This manually rolls pub packages and updates some calls to use updated APIs that use `Uri` instead of file paths (since macro-generated sources don't exist as files on disk).
This pull request is part of the effort to solve issue #144903.
In the past, my efforts to reduce line length involved refactoring away from switch statements, but unlike [yesterday's PR](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144905), this one is full of switch statements that make things more concise!
This makes several changes to flutter web app bootstrapping.
* The build now produces a `flutter_bootstrap.js` file.
* By default, this file does the basic streamlined startup of a flutter app with the service worker settings and no user configuration.
* The user can also put a `flutter_bootstrap.js` file in the `web` subdirectory in the project directory which can have whatever custom bootstrapping logic they'd like to write instead. This file is also templated, and can use any of the tokens that can be used with the `index.html` (with the exception of `{{flutter_bootstrap_js}}`, see below).
* Introduced a few new templating tokens for `index.html`:
* `{{flutter_js}}` => inlines the entirety of `flutter.js`
* `{{flutter_service_worker_version}}` => replaced directly by the service worker version. This can be used instead of the script that sets the `serviceWorkerVersion` local variable that we used to have by default.
* `{{flutter_bootstrap_js}}` => inlines the entirety of `flutter_bootstrap.js` (this token obviously doesn't apply to `flutter_bootstrap.js` itself).
* Changed `IndexHtml` to be called `WebTemplate` instead, since it is used for more than just the index.html now.
* We now emit warnings at build time for certain deprecated flows:
* Warn on the old service worker version pattern (i.e.`(const|var) serviceWorkerVersion = null`) and recommends using `{{flutter_service_worker_version}}` token instead
* Warn on use of `FlutterLoader.loadEntrypoint` and recommend using `FlutterLoader.load` instead
* Warn on manual loading of `flutter_service_worker.js`.
* The default `index.html` on `flutter create` now uses an async script tag with `flutter_bootstrap.js`.
Some tests are assuming the flutter sdk code is being checked out to flutter and checking the code to a different repository makes them fail.
Bug: https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/144487
Reverts: flutter/flutter#144752
Initiated by: andrewkolos
Reason for reverting: compilation issue has turned the tree red
Original PR Author: andrewkolos
Reviewed By: {christopherfujino}
This change reverts the following previous change:
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
When invoking a package to transform an asset, we set `FLUTTER_BUILD_MODE` to the CLI name of the build mode being used. Inspired by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101077#issuecomment-1890379501:
> Do transformers know whether they get executed in debug or release mode? I kinda imagine that being useful. Ex: There's a transformer that optimizes the file size of images. Depending on the amount and size of the images, that could take a significant amount of time. Therefore, I might want to only execute it in release builds.
Note for the reviewer: the interesting part of this change can be found in the commit [set environment variable to build mode when running asset transformer…](579912d470). The rest of the change is updating call sites with a new argument.
In service of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
When invoking a package to transform an asset, we set `FLUTTER_BUILD_MODE` to the CLI name of the build mode being used. Inspired by https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/101077#issuecomment-1890379501:
> Do transformers know whether they get executed in debug or release mode? I kinda imagine that being useful. Ex: There's a transformer that optimizes the file size of images. Depending on the amount and size of the images, that could take a significant amount of time. Therefore, I might want to only execute it in release builds.
Note for the reviewer: the interesting part of this change can be found in the commit [set environment variable to build mode when running asset transformerâ¦](579912d470). The rest of the change is updating call sites with a new argument.
This fixes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143703
We need to make sure that when source maps are enabled for the dart2js target, it advertises the sourcemap file as one of its outputs so that the web release bundle can copy it over.
The flutter engine & framework can opt out of this optimization for
individual classes / class hierarchies via:
* `@pragma(flutter:keep-to-string)`
* `@pragma(flutter:keep-to-string-in-subtypes)`
Or by using the convenience constant `@keepToString` from `dart:ui`.
=> This aligns the build process more with g3 (which already does this)
Closes https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/52759
Part of #137040 and #80374
The flag `throwOnPluginPubspecError` never actually was enabled during production in #79669, but only in some dart plugin tests. And in the tests the case of the error when enabling the flag was not explicitly tested. The only thing tested was, that it is not thrown when disabled.
As explained [here](https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/142035#discussion_r1484237904) the only case, where this error could be thrown is, when a dart implementation and a native inline implementation are provided simultaneously. But throwing an exception there is a wrong behavior, as both can coexist in a plugin package, thus in the pubspec file.
Disabling the flag means, that the error is not thrown and not shown to the user. This is the case in production (contrary to the dart plugin tests), which acts like these plugin cases of implementations are just skipped. And this is what actually should be done.
In conclusion, I think the case of coexisting dart and native implementation in pubspec was just overlooked and therefore this error validation was introduced, which is not necessary or even valid.
For more discussion, see: https://discord.com/channels/608014603317936148/608022056616853515/1200194937791205436
- This is tricky: I already added a test in #142035, which finally complies with the other tests, by removing the flag. So I think it falls in the category of "remove dead code".
- Theoretically this is a breaking change, as removing / altering some tests. But the flag actually was never valid or used, so IDK. But this may not does fall in the category of "contributed tests".
*Replace this paragraph with a description of what this PR is changing or adding, and why. Consider including before/after screenshots.*
*List which issues are fixed by this PR. You must list at least one issue. An issue is not required if the PR fixes something trivial like a typo.*
*If you had to change anything in the [flutter/tests] repo, include a link to the migration guide as per the [breaking change policy].*
`DevFSBytesContent` (and it's descendant `DevFSStringContent`) have setters that change the underlying content. These are unused outside of tests, so this PR removes them. Amongst other things, this could help me refactor https://github.com/flutter/flutter/pull/144660 into something that has fewer pitfalls.
This is purely a refactoring.
We should always target the newest, and 34 is the newest. This isn't a requirement yet (like it is for 33+) but presumably it will be made required in the nearish future.
Partial implementation of https://github.com/flutter/flutter/issues/143348
This enables asset transformation during hot reload (except for web, because that has its own implementation of `DevFS` ð). Asset transformers will be reapplied after changing any asset and performing a hot reload during `flutter run`.
