Respect submodule update=none strategy in .gitmodules
Git lets users define the default update/checkout strategy for a submodule
by setting the `submodule.<name>.update` key in `.gitmodules` file.
If the update strategy is `none`, the submodule will be skipped during
update. It will not be fetched and checked out:
1. *foo* is a big git repo
```
/tmp $ git init foo
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/foo/.git/
/tmp $ dd if=/dev/zero of=foo/big bs=1000M count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.482087 s, 2.2 GB/s
/tmp $ git -C foo add big
/tmp $ git -C foo commit -m 'I am big'
[main (root-commit) 84fb533] I am big
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 big
```
2. *bar* is a repo with a big submodule with `update=none`
```
/tmp $ git init bar
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/bar/.git/
/tmp $ git -C bar submodule add file:///tmp/foo foo
Cloning into '/tmp/bar/foo'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 1 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (3/3), 995.50 KiB | 338.00 KiB/s, done.
/tmp $ git -C bar config --file .gitmodules submodule.foo.update none
/tmp $ cat bar/.gitmodules
[submodule "foo"]
path = foo
url = file:///tmp/foo
update = none
/tmp $ git -C bar commit --all -m 'I have a big submodule with update=none'
[main (root-commit) 6c355ea] I have a big submodule not updated by default
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .gitmodules
create mode 160000 foo
```
3. *baz* is a clone of *bar*, notice *foo* submodule gets skipped
```
/tmp $ git clone --recurse-submodules file:///tmp/bar baz
Cloning into 'baz'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Submodule 'foo' (file:///tmp/foo) registered for path 'foo'
Skipping submodule 'foo'
/tmp $ git -C baz submodule update --init
Skipping submodule 'foo'
/tmp $
```
Cargo, on the other hand, ignores the submodule update strategy set in
`.gitmodules` properties when updating dependencies. Such behavior can
be considered against the wish of the crate publisher.
4. *bar* is now a lib with a big submodule with update disabled
```
/tmp $ cargo init --lib bar
Created library package
/tmp $ git -C bar add .
/tmp $ git -C bar commit -m 'I am a lib with a big submodule but update=none'
[main eb07cf7] I am a lib with a big submodule but update=none
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .gitignore
create mode 100644 Cargo.toml
create mode 100644 src/lib.rs
/tmp $
```
5. *qux* depends on *bar*, notice *bar*'s submodules are fetched
```
/tmp $ cargo init qux && cd qux
Created binary (application) package
/tmp/qux $ echo -e '[dependencies.bar]\ngit = "file:///tmp/bar"' >> Cargo.toml
/tmp/qux $ time cargo update
Updating git repository `file:///tmp/bar`
Updating git submodule `file:///tmp/foo`
real 0m22.182s
user 0m20.402s
sys 0m1.714s
/tmp/qux $
```
Fix it by checking if a Git repository submodule should be updated when
cargo processes dependencies.
6. With the change applied, submodules with `update=none` are skipped
```
/tmp/qux $ cargo cache -a > /dev/null
/tmp/qux $ time ~/src/cargo/target/debug/cargo update
Updating git repository `file:///tmp/bar`
Skipping git submodule `file:///tmp/foo`
real 0m0.029s
user 0m0.021s
sys 0m0.008s
/tmp/qux $
```
Fixes#4247.
Git lets users define the default update/checkout strategy for a submodule
by setting the `submodule.<name>.update` key in `.gitmodules` file.
If the update strategy is `none`, the submodule will be skipped during
update. It will not be fetched and checked out:
1. *foo* is a big git repo
```
/tmp $ git init foo
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/foo/.git/
/tmp $ dd if=/dev/zero of=foo/big bs=1000M count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
1048576000 bytes (1.0 GB, 1000 MiB) copied, 0.482087 s, 2.2 GB/s
/tmp $ git -C foo add big
/tmp $ git -C foo commit -m 'I am big'
[main (root-commit) 84fb533] I am big
1 file changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 big
```
2. *bar* is a repo with a big submodule with `update=none`
```
/tmp $ git init bar
Initialized empty Git repository in /tmp/bar/.git/
/tmp $ git -C bar submodule add file:///tmp/foo foo
Cloning into '/tmp/bar/foo'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 1 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (3/3), 995.50 KiB | 338.00 KiB/s, done.
/tmp $ git -C bar config --file .gitmodules submodule.foo.update none
/tmp $ cat bar/.gitmodules
[submodule "foo"]
path = foo
url = file:///tmp/foo
update = none
/tmp $ git -C bar commit --all -m 'I have a big submodule with update=none'
[main (root-commit) 6c355ea] I have a big submodule not updated by default
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .gitmodules
create mode 160000 foo
```
3. *baz* is a clone of *bar*, notice *foo* submodule gets skipped
```
/tmp $ git clone --recurse-submodules file:///tmp/bar baz
Cloning into 'baz'...
remote: Enumerating objects: 3, done.
remote: Counting objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (3/3), done.
remote: Total 3 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
Receiving objects: 100% (3/3), done.
Submodule 'foo' (file:///tmp/foo) registered for path 'foo'
Skipping submodule 'foo'
/tmp $ git -C baz submodule update --init
Skipping submodule 'foo'
/tmp $
```
Cargo, on the other hand, ignores the submodule update strategy set in
`.gitmodules` properties when updating dependencies. Such behavior can
be considered against the wish of the crate publisher.
4. *bar* is now a lib with a big submodule with update disabled
```
/tmp $ cargo init --lib bar
Created library package
/tmp $ git -C bar add .
/tmp $ git -C bar commit -m 'I am a lib with a big submodule but update=none'
[main eb07cf7] I am a lib with a big submodule but update=none
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 .gitignore
create mode 100644 Cargo.toml
create mode 100644 src/lib.rs
/tmp $
```
5. *qux* depends on *bar*, notice *bar*'s submodules are fetched
```
/tmp $ cargo init qux && cd qux
Created binary (application) package
/tmp/qux $ echo -e '[dependencies.bar]\ngit = "file:///tmp/bar"' >> Cargo.toml
/tmp/qux $ time cargo update
Updating git repository `file:///tmp/bar`
Updating git submodule `file:///tmp/foo`
real 0m22.182s
user 0m20.402s
sys 0m1.714s
/tmp/qux $
```
Fix it by checking if a Git repository submodule should be updated when
cargo processes dependencies.
6. With the change applied, submodules with `update=none` are skipped
```
/tmp/qux $ cargo cache -a > /dev/null
/tmp/qux $ time ~/src/cargo/target/debug/cargo update
Updating git repository `file:///tmp/bar`
Skipping git submodule `file:///tmp/foo`
real 0m0.029s
user 0m0.021s
sys 0m0.008s
/tmp/qux $
```
Fixes#4247.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Expose rust-version through env var
This adds another env var that is exposed by cargo. In Clippy we would like to use that in order to efficiently check if a rust-version is set for the current package: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8774
Currently we either have to parse the `Cargo.toml` file ourselves or use the `cargo_metadata` crate which has a notable performance impact when running `clippy-driver` on single files.
add validation for string "true"/"false" in lto profile
### What does this PR try to resolve?
Adds a special-cased error message for when `lto` is set to the _string_ `"true"`/`"false"` which is surprisingly (I was surprised anyway) not allowed and the error message is ambiguous. The new error message makes it clear what values are accepted.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10572
### How should we test and review this PR?
<!-- Demonstrate how you test this change and guide reviewers through your PR.
With a smooth review process, a pull request usually gets reviewed quicker.
If you don't know how to write and run your tests, please read the guide:
https://doc.crates.io/contrib/tests -->
Uh I've not actually tested yet that's the WIP part. But put
```
[profile.dev]
lto="false"
```
in your TOML and run `cargo build`, check that you get the new error message and that it makes sense and is helpful.
### Additional information
It's worth noting that as per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97051 this doesn't fix the _real_ problem here IMO which is that [rust's `opt_parse_bool` cli parsing](491f619f56/compiler/rustc_session/src/options.rs (L456)) doesn't accept true/false which certainly seems an ad-hoc historical choice to me on first glance but also it's a much bigger change to change those semantics than this error message.
- Rephrase doctest exec model as "not guranteed and may change" instead
- Mention `#[bench]` in what cargo-bench automatically runs
- Make it clear for build/rustc when mentioning bin targets auto-built
- Mention that in `src/` Cargo also collect doc tests.
- Remove outdated statement: Cargo no longer tests examples by default.
- Add a link to "Cargo Targets: Tests" to help people learn about it.
Clear disk space on CI.
Cargo's testsuite uses a considerable amount of disk space. On windows-gnu, the target directory can get over 12GB, and there is only 13GB free. We're starting to run out of disk space, so this is a stop-gap that clears out the test data before running the smoke test which uses a fair bit of space itself.
We will probably need to think about addressing #9701 somehow, otherwise we will start running out of space as we add more tests. See the linked issues in https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/9701#issuecomment-881765517 for additional context.
Guide new users to add use `super::*;` to `mod test`
### What does this PR try to resolve?
Currently, `cargo init --lib` produces examples for unit tests. However, new users will find that they are unable to use functions they defined above. This should resolve the confusion.
Fixes#10559
### How should we test and review this PR?
This PR does not create new features. Test this PR using the already-existing tests.
### Additional information
I didn't think this was a major change, so I did not open a RFC for it. Please let me know if I should have!
Document how to debug change detection events
### What does this PR try to resolve?
I noticed that my build would sometimes seemingly randomly rebuild other crates. I figured this must be the build script detecting a change in some external files. In order to debug this, I figured I'd look at the Cargo sources whether something like this was already being logged. Thankfully, the logging for this was already in place but I didn't find it documented anyway so I thought it might be rather helpful in such scenarios.
I believe it's a common enough scenario that inclusion into the official documentation on this topic should be considered.
### How should we test and review this PR?
Build/view documentation.
### Additional information
fix(publish): add more check when use `publish -p <SPEC>`
### Main issue
As issue say #10536 , we need add more check when user use `cargo publish -p <SPEC>`
>`@ehuss` point outs:
>From a behavior standpoint, here are some things to check:
> - In the root of a virtual workspace, it should be an error to run without -p.
>- It should be an error to pass -p for a non-workspace member.
>- It should be an error for -p to match multiple packages.
>- When using -p, it should publish that package, not the one in the current directory (which can be different).
fix key formatting when switching to a dotted `WorkspaceSource`
This fell out of #10697 see [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/pull/10697#discussion_r882691624)
There was a small issue where changing the source of a `cargo_add::Dependency` to a `WorkspaceSource` would cause the dotted version to have extra space.
```toml
dep .workspace = true
dep.workspace = true
```
This makes sure the key is formatted as well as adds a unit test to make sure this doesn't come back up in the future.
r? `@epage`
doc: discuss build script instruction order
### What does this PR try to resolve?
It is currently not documented that the order of build script `cargo:` instructions may be relevant to linking.
This has caused issues such as: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/96328
### How should we test and review this PR?
Build/view documentation.
### Additional information
- Cargo maintainers should fact check my wording.
- We may need to discuss if this should also be documented for `rustc`
- Maintainers should ensure that this change does not prevent a change in what is currently unspecified behavior. Perhaps `cargo` will want to rearrange link arguments itself to resolve issues in the future?
Require http-registry URLs to end with a '/'
The `url` crate normalizes URLs with no path component to end in a trailing slash. This causes the current implementation to use urls containing two slashes for registries without a path component (such as `https://index.crates.io//config.json`).
This PR resolves the issue by requiring http registry URLs to end in a slash and generating paths by concatenating. A new error message is emitted for http registry URLs that do not end in a slash.
r? `@Eh2406`
No printing executable names when running tests and benchmarks with json message format
Fixes: #10684
I added a new test for this, though I'm not sure if it's necessary. Let me know if I should delete it.
