just give up and make it an error

This commit is contained in:
Eh2406 2019-04-22 17:31:55 -04:00
parent a4737160bf
commit 35ff555b70
8 changed files with 76 additions and 119 deletions

View file

@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ use log::debug;
use crate::core::interning::InternedString;
use crate::core::{Dependency, FeatureValue, PackageId, SourceId, Summary};
use crate::util::config::Config;
use crate::util::CargoResult;
use crate::util::Graph;
@ -158,7 +157,7 @@ impl Context {
// First, figure out our set of dependencies based on the requested set
// of features. This also calculates what features we're going to enable
// for our own dependencies.
let deps = self.resolve_features(parent, candidate, method, None)?;
let deps = self.resolve_features(parent, candidate, method)?;
// Next, transform all dependencies into a list of possible candidates
// which can satisfy that dependency.
@ -218,7 +217,6 @@ impl Context {
parent: Option<&Summary>,
s: &'b Summary,
method: &'b Method<'_>,
config: Option<&Config>,
) -> ActivateResult<Vec<(Dependency, Vec<InternedString>)>> {
let dev_deps = match *method {
Method::Everything => true,
@ -246,23 +244,26 @@ impl Context {
// name.
let base = reqs.deps.get(&dep.name_in_toml()).unwrap_or(&default_dep);
used_features.insert(dep.name_in_toml());
if let Some(config) = config {
let mut shell = config.shell();
let always_required = !dep.is_optional()
&& !s
.dependencies()
.iter()
.any(|d| d.is_optional() && d.name_in_toml() == dep.name_in_toml());
if always_required && base.0 {
shell.warn(&format!(
let always_required = !dep.is_optional()
&& !s
.dependencies()
.iter()
.any(|d| d.is_optional() && d.name_in_toml() == dep.name_in_toml());
if always_required && base.0 {
return Err(match parent {
None => failure::format_err!(
"Package `{}` does not have feature `{}`. It has a required dependency \
with that name, but only optional dependencies can be used as features. \
This is currently a warning to ease the transition, but it will become an \
error in the future.",
with that name, but only optional dependencies can be used as features.",
s.package_id(),
dep.name_in_toml()
))?
}
)
.into(),
Some(p) => (
p.package_id(),
ConflictReason::RequiredDependencyAsFeatures(dep.name_in_toml()),
)
.into(),
});
}
let mut base = base.1.clone();
base.extend(dep.features().iter());

View file

@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ pub(super) fn activation_error(
msg.push_str(&describe_path(&cx.parents.path_to_bottom(p)));
}
let (features_errors, other_errors): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) = other_errors
let (features_errors, mut other_errors): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) = other_errors
.drain(..)
.partition(|&(_, r)| r.is_missing_features());
@ -146,6 +146,29 @@ pub(super) fn activation_error(
// p == parent so the full path is redundant.
}
let (required_dependency_as_features_errors, other_errors): (Vec<_>, Vec<_>) = other_errors
.drain(..)
.partition(|&(_, r)| r.is_required_dependency_as_features());
for &(p, r) in required_dependency_as_features_errors.iter() {
if let ConflictReason::RequiredDependencyAsFeatures(ref features) = *r {
msg.push_str("\n\nthe package `");
msg.push_str(&*p.name());
msg.push_str("` depends on `");
msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
msg.push_str("`, with features: `");
msg.push_str(features);
msg.push_str("` but `");
msg.push_str(&*dep.package_name());
msg.push_str("` does not have these features.\n");
msg.push_str(
" It has a required dependency with that name, \
but only optional dependencies can be used as features.\n",
);
}
// p == parent so the full path is redundant.
}
if !other_errors.is_empty() {
msg.push_str(
"\n\nall possible versions conflict with \

View file

@ -124,7 +124,6 @@ pub fn resolve(
registry: &mut dyn Registry,
try_to_use: &HashSet<PackageId>,
config: Option<&Config>,
print_warnings: bool,
check_public_visible_dependencies: bool,
) -> CargoResult<Resolve> {
let cx = Context::new(check_public_visible_dependencies);
@ -157,11 +156,6 @@ pub fn resolve(
check_duplicate_pkgs_in_lockfile(&resolve)?;
trace!("resolved: {:?}", resolve);
// If we have a shell, emit warnings about required deps used as feature.
if print_warnings && config.is_some() {
emit_warnings(&cx, &resolve, summaries, config)
}
Ok(resolve)
}
@ -1087,65 +1081,3 @@ fn check_duplicate_pkgs_in_lockfile(resolve: &Resolve) -> CargoResult<()> {
}
Ok(())
}
/// Re-run all used `resolve_features` so it can print warnings.
/// Within the resolution loop we do not pass a `config` to `resolve_features`
/// this tells it not to print warnings. Hear we do pass `config` triggering it to print them.
/// This is done as the resolution is NP-Hard so the loop can potentially call `resolve features`
/// an exponential number of times, but this pass is linear in the number of dependencies.
fn emit_warnings(
cx: &Context,
resolve: &Resolve,
summaries: &[(Summary, Method<'_>)],
config: Option<&Config>,
) {
let mut new_cx = cx.clone();
new_cx.resolve_features = im_rc::HashMap::new();
let mut features_from_dep = HashMap::new();
for (summary, method) in summaries {
let replacement = &cx.activations[&resolve
.replacements()
.get(&summary.package_id())
.unwrap_or(&summary.package_id())
.as_activations_key()]
.0;
for (dep, features) in new_cx
.resolve_features(None, replacement, &method, config)
.expect("can not resolve_features for a required summery")
{
features_from_dep.insert((replacement.package_id(), dep), features);
}
}
// crates enable features for their dependencies.
// So by iterating reverse topologically we process all of the parents before each child.
// Then we know all the needed features for each crate.
let topological_sort = resolve.sort();
for id in topological_sort
.iter()
.rev()
.filter(|&id| !resolve.replacements().contains_key(id))
{
let summary = &cx.activations[&id.as_activations_key()].0;
for (parent, deps) in cx.parents.edges(&summary.package_id()) {
for dep in deps.iter() {
let features = features_from_dep
.remove(&(*parent, dep.clone()))
.expect("fulfilled a dep that was not needed");
let method = Method::Required {
dev_deps: false,
features: &features,
all_features: false,
uses_default_features: dep.uses_default_features(),
};
for (dep, features) in new_cx
.resolve_features(None, summary, &method, config)
.expect("can not resolve_features for a used dep")
{
features_from_dep.insert((summary.package_id(), dep), features);
}
}
}
}
assert_eq!(cx.resolve_features, new_cx.resolve_features);
}

View file

@ -426,6 +426,12 @@ pub enum ConflictReason {
/// candidate we're activating didn't actually have the feature `foo`.
MissingFeatures(String),
/// A dependency listed features that ended up being a required dependency.
/// For example we tried to activate feature `foo` but the
/// candidate we're activating didn't actually have the feature `foo`
/// it had a dependency `foo` instead.
RequiredDependencyAsFeatures(InternedString),
// TODO: needs more info for `activation_error`
// TODO: needs more info for `find_candidate`
/// pub dep error
@ -446,6 +452,13 @@ impl ConflictReason {
}
false
}
pub fn is_required_dependency_as_features(&self) -> bool {
if let ConflictReason::RequiredDependencyAsFeatures(_) = *self {
return true;
}
false
}
}
/// A list of packages that have gotten in the way of resolving a dependency.

View file

@ -21,16 +21,8 @@ pub struct UpdateOptions<'a> {
pub fn generate_lockfile(ws: &Workspace<'_>) -> CargoResult<()> {
let mut registry = PackageRegistry::new(ws.config())?;
let resolve = ops::resolve_with_previous(
&mut registry,
ws,
Method::Everything,
None,
None,
&[],
true,
true,
)?;
let resolve =
ops::resolve_with_previous(&mut registry, ws, Method::Everything, None, None, &[], true)?;
ops::write_pkg_lockfile(ws, &resolve)?;
Ok(())
}
@ -92,7 +84,6 @@ pub fn update_lockfile(ws: &Workspace<'_>, opts: &UpdateOptions<'_>) -> CargoRes
Some(&to_avoid),
&[],
true,
true,
)?;
// Summarize what is changing for the user.

View file

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ version. This may also occur with an optional dependency that is not enabled.";
/// lock file.
pub fn resolve_ws<'a>(ws: &Workspace<'a>) -> CargoResult<(PackageSet<'a>, Resolve)> {
let mut registry = PackageRegistry::new(ws.config())?;
let resolve = resolve_with_registry(ws, &mut registry, true)?;
let resolve = resolve_with_registry(ws, &mut registry)?;
let packages = get_resolved_packages(&resolve, registry)?;
Ok((packages, resolve))
}
@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ pub fn resolve_ws_with_method<'a>(
} else if ws.require_optional_deps() {
// First, resolve the root_package's *listed* dependencies, as well as
// downloading and updating all remotes and such.
let resolve = resolve_with_registry(ws, &mut registry, false)?;
let resolve = resolve_with_registry(ws, &mut registry)?;
add_patches = false;
// Second, resolve with precisely what we're doing. Filter out
@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ pub fn resolve_ws_with_method<'a>(
None,
specs,
add_patches,
true,
)?;
let packages = get_resolved_packages(&resolved_with_overrides, registry)?;
@ -109,7 +108,6 @@ pub fn resolve_ws_with_method<'a>(
fn resolve_with_registry<'cfg>(
ws: &Workspace<'cfg>,
registry: &mut PackageRegistry<'cfg>,
warn: bool,
) -> CargoResult<Resolve> {
let prev = ops::load_pkg_lockfile(ws)?;
let resolve = resolve_with_previous(
@ -120,7 +118,6 @@ fn resolve_with_registry<'cfg>(
None,
&[],
true,
warn,
)?;
if !ws.is_ephemeral() {
@ -146,7 +143,6 @@ pub fn resolve_with_previous<'cfg>(
to_avoid: Option<&HashSet<PackageId>>,
specs: &[PackageIdSpec],
register_patches: bool,
warn: bool,
) -> CargoResult<Resolve> {
// Here we place an artificial limitation that all non-registry sources
// cannot be locked at more than one revision. This means that if a Git
@ -334,7 +330,6 @@ pub fn resolve_with_previous<'cfg>(
registry,
&try_to_use,
Some(ws.config()),
warn,
false, // TODO: use "public and private dependencies" feature flag
)?;
resolved.register_used_patches(registry.patches());

View file

@ -291,13 +291,12 @@ fn invalid9() {
.file("bar/src/lib.rs", "")
.build();
p.cargo("build --features bar").with_stderr("\
warning: Package `foo v0.0.1 ([..])` does not have feature `bar`. It has a required dependency with \
that name, but only optional dependencies can be used as features. [..]
Compiling bar v0.0.1 ([..])
Compiling foo v0.0.1 ([..])
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in [..]s
").run();
p.cargo("build --features bar")
.with_stderr(
"\
error: Package `foo v0.0.1 ([..])` does not have feature `bar`. It has a required dependency with that name, but only optional dependencies can be used as features.
",
).with_status(101).run();
}
#[test]
@ -335,13 +334,17 @@ fn invalid10() {
.build();
p.cargo("build").with_stderr("\
warning: Package `bar v0.0.1 ([..])` does not have feature `baz`. It has a required dependency with \
that name, but only optional dependencies can be used as features. [..]
Compiling baz v0.0.1 ([..])
Compiling bar v0.0.1 ([..])
Compiling foo v0.0.1 ([..])
Finished dev [unoptimized + debuginfo] target(s) in [..]s
").run();
error: failed to select a version for `bar`.
... required by package `foo v0.0.1 ([..])`
versions that meet the requirements `*` are: 0.0.1
the package `foo` depends on `bar`, with features: `baz` but `bar` does not have these features.
It has a required dependency with that name, but only optional dependencies can be used as features.
failed to select a version for `bar` which could resolve this conflict
").with_status(101)
.run();
}
#[test]

View file

@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ pub fn resolve_with_config_raw(
&HashSet::new(),
config,
true,
true,
);
// The largest test in our suite takes less then 30 sec.