2023-09-07 04:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
//! Tests for `CacheLock`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
use crate::config::ConfigBuilder;
|
|
|
|
use cargo::util::cache_lock::{CacheLockMode, CacheLocker};
|
|
|
|
use cargo_test_support::paths::{self, CargoPathExt};
|
|
|
|
use cargo_test_support::{retry, thread_wait_timeout, threaded_timeout};
|
|
|
|
use std::thread::JoinHandle;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Helper to verify that it is OK to acquire the given lock (it shouldn't block).
|
|
|
|
fn verify_lock_is_ok(mode: CacheLockMode) {
|
|
|
|
let root = paths::root();
|
|
|
|
threaded_timeout(10, move || {
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().root(root).build();
|
|
|
|
let locker = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
// This would block if it is held.
|
|
|
|
let _lock = locker.lock(&config, mode).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker.is_locked(mode));
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Helper to acquire two locks from the same locker.
|
|
|
|
fn a_b_nested(a: CacheLockMode, b: CacheLockMode) {
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().build();
|
|
|
|
let locker = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
let lock1 = locker.lock(&config, a).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker.is_locked(a));
|
|
|
|
let lock2 = locker.lock(&config, b).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker.is_locked(b));
|
|
|
|
drop(lock2);
|
|
|
|
drop(lock1);
|
|
|
|
// Verify locks were unlocked.
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::Shared);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Helper to acquire two locks from separate lockers, verifying that they
|
|
|
|
/// don't block each other.
|
|
|
|
fn a_then_b_separate_not_blocked(a: CacheLockMode, b: CacheLockMode, verify: CacheLockMode) {
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().build();
|
|
|
|
let locker1 = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
let lock1 = locker1.lock(&config, a).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker1.is_locked(a));
|
|
|
|
let locker2 = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
let lock2 = locker2.lock(&config, b).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker2.is_locked(b));
|
|
|
|
let thread = verify_lock_would_block(verify);
|
|
|
|
// Unblock the thread.
|
|
|
|
drop(lock1);
|
|
|
|
drop(lock2);
|
|
|
|
// Verify the thread is unblocked.
|
|
|
|
thread_wait_timeout::<()>(100, thread);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Helper to acquire two locks from separate lockers, verifying that the
|
|
|
|
/// second one blocks.
|
|
|
|
fn a_then_b_separate_blocked(a: CacheLockMode, b: CacheLockMode) {
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().build();
|
|
|
|
let locker = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
let lock = locker.lock(&config, a).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker.is_locked(a));
|
|
|
|
let thread = verify_lock_would_block(b);
|
|
|
|
// Unblock the thread.
|
|
|
|
drop(lock);
|
|
|
|
// Verify the thread is unblocked.
|
|
|
|
thread_wait_timeout::<()>(100, thread);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Helper to verify that acquiring the given mode would block.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Always call `thread_wait_timeout` on the result.
|
|
|
|
#[must_use]
|
|
|
|
fn verify_lock_would_block(mode: CacheLockMode) -> JoinHandle<()> {
|
|
|
|
let root = paths::root();
|
|
|
|
// Spawn a thread that will block on the lock.
|
|
|
|
let thread = std::thread::spawn(move || {
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().root(root).build();
|
|
|
|
let locker2 = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
let lock2 = locker2.lock(&config, mode).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
assert!(locker2.is_locked(mode));
|
|
|
|
drop(lock2);
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Verify that it blocked.
|
|
|
|
retry(100, || {
|
|
|
|
if let Ok(s) = std::fs::read_to_string(paths::root().join("shell.out")) {
|
|
|
|
if s.trim().starts_with("Blocking waiting for file lock on") {
|
|
|
|
return Some(());
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
eprintln!("unexpected output: {s}");
|
|
|
|
// Try again, it might have been partially written.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
thread
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[test]
|
|
|
|
fn new_is_unlocked() {
|
|
|
|
let locker = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
assert!(!locker.is_locked(CacheLockMode::Shared));
|
|
|
|
assert!(!locker.is_locked(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive));
|
|
|
|
assert!(!locker.is_locked(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn multiple_shared() {
|
|
|
|
// Test that two nested shared locks from the same locker are safe to acquire.
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(CacheLockMode::Shared, CacheLockMode::Shared);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn multiple_shared_separate() {
|
|
|
|
// Test that two independent shared locks are safe to acquire at the same time.
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_not_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::Shared,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::Shared,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn multiple_download() {
|
|
|
|
// That that two nested download locks from the same locker are safe to acquire.
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn multiple_mutate() {
|
|
|
|
// That that two nested mutate locks from the same locker are safe to acquire.
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
#[should_panic(expected = "lock is not allowed")]
|
|
|
|
fn download_then_shared() {
|
|
|
|
// This sequence is not supported.
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive, CacheLockMode::Shared);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
2023-09-23 21:21:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#[should_panic(expected = "lock upgrade from shared to exclusive not supported")]
|
2023-09-07 04:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
fn shared_then_mutate() {
|
|
|
|
// This sequence is not supported.
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(CacheLockMode::Shared, CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn shared_then_download() {
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(CacheLockMode::Shared, CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive);
|
|
|
|
// Verify drop actually unlocked.
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn mutate_then_shared() {
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive, CacheLockMode::Shared);
|
|
|
|
// Verify drop actually unlocked.
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn download_then_mutate() {
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify drop actually unlocked.
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn mutate_then_download() {
|
|
|
|
a_b_nested(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
// Verify drop actually unlocked.
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn readonly() {
|
|
|
|
// In a permission denied situation, it should still allow a lock. It just
|
|
|
|
// silently behaves as-if it was locked.
|
|
|
|
let cargo_home = paths::home().join(".cargo");
|
|
|
|
std::fs::create_dir_all(&cargo_home).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let mut perms = std::fs::metadata(&cargo_home).unwrap().permissions();
|
|
|
|
perms.set_readonly(true);
|
|
|
|
std::fs::set_permissions(&cargo_home, perms).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().build();
|
|
|
|
let locker = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
for mode in [
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::Shared,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
] {
|
2023-09-23 21:21:57 +00:00
|
|
|
let _lock1 = locker.lock(&config, mode).unwrap();
|
|
|
|
// Make sure it can recursively acquire the lock, too.
|
|
|
|
let _lock2 = locker.lock(&config, mode).unwrap();
|
2023-09-07 04:01:18 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn download_then_shared_separate() {
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_not_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::Shared,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn shared_then_download_separate() {
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_not_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::Shared,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn multiple_download_separate() {
|
|
|
|
// Test that with two independent download locks, the second blocks until
|
|
|
|
// the first is released.
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn multiple_mutate_separate() {
|
|
|
|
// Test that with two independent mutate locks, the second blocks until
|
|
|
|
// the first is released.
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn shared_then_mutate_separate() {
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_blocked(CacheLockMode::Shared, CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn download_then_mutate_separate() {
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn mutate_then_download_separate() {
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_blocked(
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive,
|
|
|
|
CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test]
|
|
|
|
fn mutate_then_shared_separate() {
|
|
|
|
a_then_b_separate_blocked(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive, CacheLockMode::Shared);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[cargo_test(ignore_windows = "no method to prevent creating or locking a file")]
|
|
|
|
fn mutate_err_is_atomic() {
|
|
|
|
// Verifies that when getting a mutate lock, that if the first lock
|
|
|
|
// succeeds, but the second one fails, that the first lock is released.
|
|
|
|
let config = ConfigBuilder::new().build();
|
|
|
|
let locker = CacheLocker::new();
|
|
|
|
let cargo_home = config.home().as_path_unlocked();
|
|
|
|
let cache_path = cargo_home.join(".package-cache");
|
|
|
|
// This is a hacky way to force an error acquiring the download lock. By
|
|
|
|
// making it a directory, it is unable to open it.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: Unfortunately this doesn't work on Windows. I don't have any
|
|
|
|
// ideas on how to simulate an error on Windows.
|
|
|
|
cache_path.mkdir_p();
|
|
|
|
match locker.lock(&config, CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive) {
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => panic!("did not expect lock to succeed"),
|
|
|
|
Err(e) => {
|
|
|
|
let msg = format!("{e:?}");
|
|
|
|
assert!(msg.contains("failed to open:"), "{msg}");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert!(!locker.is_locked(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive));
|
|
|
|
assert!(!locker.is_locked(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive));
|
|
|
|
assert!(!locker.is_locked(CacheLockMode::Shared));
|
|
|
|
cache_path.rm_rf();
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::DownloadExclusive);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::Shared);
|
|
|
|
verify_lock_is_ok(CacheLockMode::MutateExclusive);
|
|
|
|
}
|