podman/test/system/055-rm.bats
Ed Santiago 4fb7036ca1 tests for exit status on podman run --rm
...and on a container killed by 'podman rm -f'. See #3795

Disable when testing podman-remote; see #3808

Signed-off-by: Ed Santiago <santiago@redhat.com>
2019-08-14 15:14:55 -06:00

43 lines
1.3 KiB
Bash

#!/usr/bin/env bats -*- bats -*-
#
# tests for podman rm
#
load helpers
@test "podman rm" {
rand=$(random_string 30)
run_podman run --name $rand $IMAGE /bin/true
# Don't care about output, just check exit status (it should exist)
run_podman 0 inspect $rand
# container should be in output of 'ps -a'
run_podman ps -a
is "$output" ".* $IMAGE .*/true .* $rand" "Container present in 'ps -a'"
# Remove container; now 'inspect' should fail
run_podman rm $rand
run_podman 125 inspect $rand
}
# I'm sorry! This test takes 13 seconds. There's not much I can do about it,
# please know that I think it's justified: podman 1.5.0 had a strange bug
# in with exit status was not preserved on some code paths with 'rm -f'
# or 'podman run --rm' (see also 030-run.bats). The test below is a bit
# kludgy: what we care about is the exit status of the killed container,
# not 'podman rm', but BATS has no provision (that I know of) for forking,
# so what we do is start the 'rm' beforehand and monitor the exit status
# of the 'sleep' container.
#
# See https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/3795
@test "podman rm -f" {
skip_if_remote "podman-remote does not handle exit codes"
rand=$(random_string 30)
( sleep 3; run_podman rm -f $rand ) &
run_podman 137 run --name $rand $IMAGE sleep 30
}
# vim: filetype=sh