change the default on cgroups v2 and create a new cgroup namespace.
When a cgroup namespace is used, processes inside the namespace are
only able to see cgroup paths relative to the cgroup namespace root
and not have full visibility on all the cgroups present on the
system.
The previous behaviour is maintained on a cgroups v1 host, where a
cgroup namespace is not created by default.
Closes: https://github.com/containers/libpod/issues/4363
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
If we call Container(), we expect the namespace to be prefixed with "container:".
Add this check, and refactor to use named const strings instead of string literals
Signed-off-by: Peter Hunt <pehunt@redhat.com>
allow a container to run in a new cgroup namespace.
When running in a new cgroup namespace, the current cgroup appears to
be the root, so that there is no way for the container to access
cgroups outside of its own subtree.
By default it uses --cgroup=host to keep the previous behavior.
To create a new namespace, --cgroup=private must be provided.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
it creates a namespace where the current UID:GID on the host is mapped
to the same UID:GID in the container.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
We accidentally patched this out trying to enable ns:/path/to/ns
This should restore the ability to configure nondefault CNI
networks with Podman, by ensuring that they request creation of a
network namespace.
Completely remove the WithNetNS() call when we do use an explicit
namespace from a path. We use that call to indicate that a netns
is going to be created - there should not be any question about
whether it actually does.
Fixes#2795
Signed-off-by: Matthew Heon <mheon@redhat.com>
We should be sharing cgroups namespace by default in pods
uts namespace sharing was broken in pods.
Create a new libpod/pkg/namespaces for handling of namespace fields
in containers
Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
Closes: #1418
Approved by: mheon
