Run codespell on code

Signed-off-by: Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Daniel J Walsh 2022-09-27 06:24:17 -04:00
parent 5aa32e45ad
commit efbad590d7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: A2DF901DABE2C028
6 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions

View file

@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ test/version/version: version/version.go
.PHONY: codespell
codespell:
codespell -S bin,vendor,.git,go.sum,.cirrus.yml,"RELEASE_NOTES.md,*.xz,*.gz,*.ps1,*.tar,swagger.yaml,*.tgz,bin2img,*ico,*.png,*.1,*.5,copyimg,*.orig,apidoc.go" -L clos,ans,pullrequest,uint,iff,od,seeked,splitted,marge,erro,hist,ether -w
codespell -S bin,vendor,.git,go.sum,.cirrus.yml,"RELEASE_NOTES.md,*.xz,*.gz,*.ps1,*.tar,swagger.yaml,*.tgz,bin2img,*ico,*.png,*.1,*.5,copyimg,*.orig,apidoc.go" -L te,clos,ans,pullrequest,uint,iff,od,seeked,splitted,marge,erro,hist,ether -w
.PHONY: validate
validate: lint .gitvalidation validate.completions man-page-check swagger-check tests-included tests-expect-exit pr-removes-fixed-skips

View file

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ outdated) example of it's output can be seen below:
While it's arguably easier to read that `only_if`, it leads to a cluttered
status output that's harder to page through when reviewing PRs. As opposed
to `only_if` which will bypass creation of the task (at runtime) completely.
Also, by sticking to one conditional style, it's easer to re-use the YAML
Also, by sticking to one conditional style, it's easier to re-use the YAML
statements across multiple tasks.
+ The only variables which can be used as part of conditions are defined by

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
[comment]: <> (***ATTENTION*** ***WARNING*** ***ALERT*** ***CAUTION*** ***DANGER***)
[comment]: <> ()
[comment]: <> (ANY changes made to this file, once commited/merged must)
[comment]: <> (ANY changes made to this file, once committed/merged must)
[comment]: <> (be manually copy/pasted -in markdown- into the description)
[comment]: <> (field on Quay at the following locations:)
[comment]: <> ()

View file

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ func TestParseSignal(t *testing.T) {
wantErr: false,
},
{
name: "Case doesnt matter",
name: "Case does not matter",
args: args{
rawSignal: "kIlL",
},

View file

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ func Test_validChownFlag(t *testing.T) {
wantErr: false,
},
{
name: "U true case doesnt matter",
name: "U true case does not matter",
args: args{
flag: "u=True",
},

View file

@ -391,7 +391,7 @@ func (f *UnitFile) Parse(data string) error {
line, data = nextLine(data, 0)
// Handle multi-line continuations
// Note: This doesn't support coments in the middle of the continuation, which systemd does
// Note: This doesn't support comments in the middle of the continuation, which systemd does
if lineIsKeyValuePair(line) {
for len(data) > 0 && line[len(line)-1] == '\\' {
line, data = nextLine(origdata, len(line)+1)
@ -437,7 +437,7 @@ func (g *unitGroup) write(w io.Writer) error {
}
if g.name == "" {
// Empty name groups are not valid, but used interally to handle comments in empty files
// Empty name groups are not valid, but used internally to handle comments in empty files
return nil
}
@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ func (g *unitGroup) write(w io.Writer) error {
return nil
}
// Covert a UnitFile back to data, writing to the io.Writer w
// Convert a UnitFile back to data, writing to the io.Writer w
func (f *UnitFile) Write(w io.Writer) error {
for i, g := range f.groups {
// We always add a newline between groups, and strip one if it exists during
@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ func (f *UnitFile) Write(w io.Writer) error {
return nil
}
// Covert a UnitFile back to data, as a string
// Convert a UnitFile back to data, as a string
func (f *UnitFile) ToString() (string, error) {
var str strings.Builder
if err := f.Write(&str); err != nil {