podman/Makefile

355 lines
12 KiB
Makefile
Raw Normal View History

GO ?= go
DESTDIR ?= /
EPOCH_TEST_COMMIT ?= 921ccac10c47e0865ec5e4ba00ebb69a03d89473
HEAD ?= HEAD
CHANGELOG_BASE ?= HEAD~
CHANGELOG_TARGET ?= HEAD
PROJECT := github.com/containers/libpod
GIT_BRANCH ?= $(shell git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD 2>/dev/null)
GIT_BRANCH_CLEAN ?= $(shell echo $(GIT_BRANCH) | sed -e "s/[^[:alnum:]]/-/g")
LIBPOD_IMAGE ?= libpod_dev$(if $(GIT_BRANCH_CLEAN),:$(GIT_BRANCH_CLEAN))
LIBPOD_INSTANCE := libpod_dev
PREFIX ?= ${DESTDIR}/usr/local
BINDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/bin
LIBEXECDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/libexec
MANDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/share/man
SHAREDIR_CONTAINERS ?= ${PREFIX}/share/containers
ETCDIR ?= ${DESTDIR}/etc
ETCDIR_LIBPOD ?= ${ETCDIR}/crio
TMPFILESDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/lib/tmpfiles.d
SYSTEMDDIR ?= ${PREFIX}/lib/systemd/system
BUILDTAGS ?= seccomp $(shell hack/btrfs_tag.sh) $(shell hack/btrfs_installed_tag.sh) $(shell hack/ostree_tag.sh) $(shell hack/selinux_tag.sh) $(shell hack/apparmor_tag.sh) varlink exclude_graphdriver_devicemapper
BUILDTAGS_CROSS ?= containers_image_openpgp containers_image_ostree_stub exclude_graphdriver_btrfs exclude_graphdriver_devicemapper exclude_graphdriver_overlay
2018-06-22 13:56:08 +00:00
ifneq (,$(findstring varlink,$(BUILDTAGS)))
PODMAN_VARLINK_DEPENDENCIES = cmd/podman/varlink/iopodman.go
2018-06-22 13:56:08 +00:00
endif
CONTAINER_RUNTIME := $(shell command -v podman 2> /dev/null || echo docker)
2018-06-22 13:56:08 +00:00
HAS_PYTHON3 := $(shell command -v python3 2>/dev/null)
BASHINSTALLDIR=${PREFIX}/share/bash-completion/completions
OCIUMOUNTINSTALLDIR=$(PREFIX)/share/oci-umount/oci-umount.d
SELINUXOPT ?= $(shell test -x /usr/sbin/selinuxenabled && selinuxenabled && echo -Z)
PACKAGES ?= $(shell $(GO) list -tags "${BUILDTAGS}" ./... | grep -v github.com/containers/libpod/vendor | grep -v e2e)
COMMIT_NO ?= $(shell git rev-parse HEAD 2> /dev/null || true)
GIT_COMMIT ?= $(if $(shell git status --porcelain --untracked-files=no),"${COMMIT_NO}-dirty","${COMMIT_NO}")
BUILD_INFO ?= $(shell date +%s)
LIBPOD := ${PROJECT}/libpod
LDFLAGS_PODMAN ?= $(LDFLAGS) -X $(LIBPOD).gitCommit=$(GIT_COMMIT) -X $(LIBPOD).buildInfo=$(BUILD_INFO)
ISODATE ?= $(shell date --iso-8601)
LIBSECCOMP_COMMIT := release-2.3
# If GOPATH not specified, use one in the local directory
ifeq ($(GOPATH),)
export GOPATH := $(CURDIR)/_output
unexport GOBIN
endif
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
FIRST_GOPATH := $(firstword $(subst :, ,$(GOPATH)))
GOPKGDIR := $(FIRST_GOPATH)/src/$(PROJECT)
GOPKGBASEDIR ?= $(shell dirname "$(GOPKGDIR)")
GOBIN := $(shell $(GO) env GOBIN)
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
ifeq ($(GOBIN),)
GOBIN := $(FIRST_GOPATH)/bin
endif
GOMD2MAN ?= $(shell command -v go-md2man || echo '$(GOBIN)/go-md2man')
BOX="fedora_atomic"
CROSS_BUILD_TARGETS := \
bin/podman.cross.darwin.amd64 \
bin/podman.cross.linux.amd64
all: binaries docs
default: help
help:
@echo "Usage: make <target>"
@echo
@echo " * 'install' - Install binaries to system locations"
@echo " * 'binaries' - Build podman"
@echo " * 'integration' - Execute integration tests"
@echo " * 'clean' - Clean artifacts"
@echo " * 'lint' - Execute the source code linter"
@echo " * 'gofmt' - Verify the source code gofmt"
.gopathok:
ifeq ("$(wildcard $(GOPKGDIR))","")
mkdir -p "$(GOPKGBASEDIR)"
ln -s "$(CURDIR)" "$(GOPKGBASEDIR)"
endif
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
touch $@
lint: .gopathok varlink_generate
@echo "checking lint"
@./.tool/lint
# Not ready
# @$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/podman lint
# @$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/pypodman lint
gofmt:
find . -name '*.go' ! -path './vendor/*' -exec gofmt -s -w {} \+
git diff --exit-code
test/bin2img/bin2img: .gopathok $(wildcard test/bin2img/*.go)
$(GO) build -ldflags '$(LDFLAGS)' -tags "$(BUILDTAGS) containers_image_ostree_stub" -o $@ $(PROJECT)/test/bin2img
test/copyimg/copyimg: .gopathok $(wildcard test/copyimg/*.go)
$(GO) build -ldflags '$(LDFLAGS)' -tags "$(BUILDTAGS) containers_image_ostree_stub" -o $@ $(PROJECT)/test/copyimg
test/checkseccomp/checkseccomp: .gopathok $(wildcard test/checkseccomp/*.go)
$(GO) build -ldflags '$(LDFLAGS)' -tags "$(BUILDTAGS) containers_image_ostree_stub" -o $@ $(PROJECT)/test/checkseccomp
2018-06-22 13:56:08 +00:00
podman: .gopathok $(PODMAN_VARLINK_DEPENDENCIES)
$(GO) build -i -ldflags '$(LDFLAGS_PODMAN)' -tags "$(BUILDTAGS)" -o bin/$@ $(PROJECT)/cmd/podman
local-cross: $(CROSS_BUILD_TARGETS)
bin/podman.cross.%: .gopathok
TARGET="$*"; \
GOOS="$${TARGET%%.*}" \
GOARCH="$${TARGET##*.}" \
$(GO) build -i -ldflags '$(LDFLAGS_PODMAN)' -tags '$(BUILDTAGS_CROSS)' -o "$@" $(PROJECT)/cmd/podman
python:
ifdef HAS_PYTHON3
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/podman python-podman
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/pypodman python-pypodman
endif
clean:
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
rm -rf \
.gopathok \
_output \
bin \
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
build \
test/bin2img/bin2img \
test/checkseccomp/checkseccomp \
test/copyimg/copyimg \
test/testdata/redis-image \
cmd/podman/varlink/iopodman.go \
libpod/container_ffjson.go \
libpod/pod_ffjson.go \
libpod/container_easyjson.go \
libpod/pod_easyjson.go \
$(MANPAGES) ||:
find . -name \*~ -delete
find . -name \#\* -delete
Makefile: Call contrib/python's clean regardless of HAS_PYTHON3 The only Python dependency in contrib/python's clean is: $(PYTHON) setup.py clean --all and our setup.pys work on both major Python versions: $ make -C contrib/python/podman PYTHON=python2 clean make: Entering directory `/.../libpod/contrib/python/podman' python2 setup.py clean --all /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'python_requires' warnings.warn(msg) running clean 'build/lib' does not exist -- can't clean it 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' does not exist -- can't clean it 'build/scripts-2.7' does not exist -- can't clean it rm -rf podman.egg-info dist find . -depth -name __pycache__ -exec rm -rf {} \; find . -depth -name \*.pyc -exec rm -f {} \; make: Leaving directory `/.../libpod/contrib/python/podman' $ echo $? 0 $ make -C contrib/python/pypodman PYTHON=python2 clean make: Entering directory `/.../libpod/contrib/python/pypodman' python2 setup.py clean --all /usr/lib64/python2.7/distutils/dist.py:267: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'python_requires' warnings.warn(msg) running clean removing 'build/lib' (and everything under it) removing 'build/bdist.linux-x86_64' (and everything under it) 'build/scripts-2.7' does not exist -- can't clean it removing 'build' rm -rf pypodman.egg-info dist find . -depth -name __pycache__ -exec rm -rf {} \; find . -depth -name \*.pyc -exec rm -f {} \; make: Leaving directory `/.../libpod/contrib/python/pypodman' $ echo $? 0 This rolls back part of 390bd16d (tidy up the copr spec, 2018-05-20, #813). I've also shifted the submake cleans to the end of the main clean recipe. That way, if one of the submake cleans dies (e.g. because the system lacks Python entirely), the temp-file removal will still happen. The way I have it setup now, the podman clean dying will keep any of the pypodman clean from happening. You could probably work around that with something like: $(MAKE) -C contrib/python/podman clean & \ $(MAKE) -C contrib/python/pypodman clean & \ wait but that seems too fancy for such a corner case. Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
2018-05-21 17:24:26 +00:00
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/podman clean
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/pypodman clean
libpodimage:
${CONTAINER_RUNTIME} build -t ${LIBPOD_IMAGE} .
dbuild: libpodimage
${CONTAINER_RUNTIME} run --name=${LIBPOD_INSTANCE} --privileged -v ${PWD}:/go/src/${PROJECT} --rm ${LIBPOD_IMAGE} make all
test: libpodimage
${CONTAINER_RUNTIME} run -e STORAGE_OPTIONS="--storage-driver=vfs" -e TESTFLAGS -e CGROUP_MANAGER=cgroupfs -e TRAVIS -t --privileged --rm -v ${CURDIR}:/go/src/${PROJECT} ${LIBPOD_IMAGE} make clean all localunit localintegration
integration: libpodimage
${CONTAINER_RUNTIME} run -e STORAGE_OPTIONS="--storage-driver=vfs" -e TESTFLAGS -e CGROUP_MANAGER=cgroupfs -e TRAVIS -t --privileged --rm -v ${CURDIR}:/go/src/${PROJECT} ${LIBPOD_IMAGE} make clean all localintegration
integration.fedora:
DIST=Fedora sh .papr_prepare.sh
integration.centos:
DIST=CentOS sh .papr_prepare.sh
shell: libpodimage
${CONTAINER_RUNTIME} run --tmpfs -e STORAGE_OPTIONS="--storage-driver=vfs" -e CGROUP_MANAGER=cgroupfs -e TESTFLAGS -e TRAVIS -it --privileged --rm -v ${CURDIR}:/go/src/${PROJECT} ${LIBPOD_IMAGE} sh
testunit: libpodimage
${CONTAINER_RUNTIME} run -e STORAGE_OPTIONS="--storage-driver=vfs" -e TESTFLAGS -e CGROUP_MANAGER=cgroupfs -e TRAVIS -t --privileged --rm -v ${CURDIR}:/go/src/${PROJECT} ${LIBPOD_IMAGE} make localunit
localunit: varlink_generate
$(GO) test -tags "$(BUILDTAGS)" -cover $(PACKAGES)
ginkgo:
ginkgo -v -tags "$(BUILDTAGS)" -cover -flakeAttempts 3 -progress -trace -noColor test/e2e/.
localintegration: varlink_generate test-binaries clientintegration ginkgo
clientintegration:
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/podman integration
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/pypodman integration
vagrant-check:
BOX=$(BOX) sh ./vagrant.sh
binaries: varlink_generate easyjson_generate podman
test-binaries: test/bin2img/bin2img test/copyimg/copyimg test/checkseccomp/checkseccomp
MANPAGES_MD ?= $(wildcard docs/*.md pkg/*/docs/*.md)
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
MANPAGES ?= $(MANPAGES_MD:%.md=%)
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
$(MANPAGES): %: %.md .gopathok
@sed -e 's/\((podman.*\.md)\)//' -e 's/\[\(podman.*\)\]/\1/' $< | $(GOMD2MAN) -in /dev/stdin -out $@
docs: $(MANPAGES)
docker-docs: docs
(cd docs; ./dckrman.sh *.1)
changelog:
@echo "Creating changelog from $(CHANGELOG_BASE) to $(CHANGELOG_TARGET)"
$(eval TMPFILE := $(shell mktemp))
$(shell cat changelog.txt > $(TMPFILE))
$(shell echo "- Changelog for $(CHANGELOG_TARGET) ($(ISODATE)):" > changelog.txt)
$(shell git log --no-merges --format=" * %s" $(CHANGELOG_BASE)..$(CHANGELOG_TARGET) >> changelog.txt)
$(shell echo "" >> changelog.txt)
$(shell cat $(TMPFILE) >> changelog.txt)
$(shell rm $(TMPFILE))
install: .gopathok install.bin install.man install.cni install.systemd install.python
install.bin:
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 $(BINDIR)
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 755 bin/podman $(BINDIR)/podman
install.man: docs
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 $(MANDIR)/man1
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 $(MANDIR)/man5
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 $(filter %.1,$(MANPAGES)) -t $(MANDIR)/man1
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 $(filter %.5,$(MANPAGES)) -t $(MANDIR)/man5
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 docs/links/*1 -t $(MANDIR)/man1
install.config:
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 $(SHAREDIR_CONTAINERS) $(ETCDIR_LIBPOD) $(OCIUMOUNTINSTALLDIR)
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 libpod.conf $(SHAREDIR_CONTAINERS)/libpod.conf
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 seccomp.json $(ETCDIR_LIBPOD)/seccomp.json
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 crio-umount.conf $(OCIUMOUNTINSTALLDIR)/crio-umount.conf
install.completions:
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 ${BASHINSTALLDIR}
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 completions/bash/podman ${BASHINSTALLDIR}
install.cni:
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 ${ETCDIR}/cni/net.d/
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 cni/87-podman-bridge.conflist ${ETCDIR}/cni/net.d/87-podman-bridge.conflist
install.docker: docker-docs
install ${SELINUXOPT} -d -m 755 $(BINDIR) $(MANDIR)/man1
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 755 docker $(BINDIR)/docker
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 docs/docker*.1 -t $(MANDIR)/man1
install.systemd:
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 755 -d ${SYSTEMDDIR} ${TMPFILESDIR}
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 contrib/varlink/io.podman.socket ${SYSTEMDDIR}/io.podman.socket
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 contrib/varlink/io.podman.service ${SYSTEMDDIR}/io.podman.service
install ${SELINUXOPT} -m 644 contrib/varlink/podman.conf ${TMPFILESDIR}/podman.conf
install.python:
$(MAKE) DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} -C contrib/python/podman install
$(MAKE) DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} -C contrib/python/pypodman install
uninstall:
for i in $(filter %.1,$(MANPAGES)); do \
rm -f $(MANDIR)/man1/$$(basename $${i}); \
done; \
for i in $(filter %.5,$(MANPAGES)); do \
rm -f $(MANDIR)/man5/$$(basename $${i}); \
done
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/pypodman uninstall
$(MAKE) -C contrib/python/podman uninstall
.PHONY: .gitvalidation
.gitvalidation: .gopathok
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
GIT_CHECK_EXCLUDE="./vendor" $(GOBIN)/git-validation -v -run DCO,short-subject,dangling-whitespace -range $(EPOCH_TEST_COMMIT)..$(HEAD)
.PHONY: install.tools
install.tools: .install.gitvalidation .install.gometalinter .install.md2man .install.easyjson .install.ginkgo .install.gomega
.install.gomega: .gopathok
$(GO) get github.com/onsi/gomega/...
.install.ginkgo: .gopathok
if [ ! -x "$(GOBIN)/ginkgo" ]; then \
$(GO) get -u github.com/onsi/ginkgo/ginkgo; \
fi
.install.gitvalidation: .gopathok
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
if [ ! -x "$(GOBIN)/git-validation" ]; then \
$(GO) get -u github.com/vbatts/git-validation; \
fi
.install.gometalinter: .gopathok
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
if [ ! -x "$(GOBIN)/gometalinter" ]; then \
$(GO) get -u github.com/alecthomas/gometalinter; \
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
cd $(FIRST_GOPATH)/src/github.com/alecthomas/gometalinter; \
git checkout 23261fa046586808612c61da7a81d75a658e0814; \
$(GO) install github.com/alecthomas/gometalinter; \
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
$(GOBIN)/gometalinter --install; \
fi
.install.md2man: .gopathok
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
if [ ! -x "$(GOBIN)/go-md2man" ]; then \
$(GO) get -u github.com/cpuguy83/go-md2man; \
fi
.install.easyjson: .gopathok
if [ ! -x "$(GOBIN)/easyffjson" ]; then \
$(GO) get -u github.com/mailru/easyjson/...; \
fi
.install.ostree: .gopathok
if ! pkg-config ostree-1 2> /dev/null ; then \
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
git clone https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree $(FIRST_GOPATH)/src/github.com/ostreedev/ostree ; \
cd $(FIRST_GOPATH)src/github.com/ostreedev/ostree ; \
./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr/local; \
make all install; \
fi
varlink_generate: .gopathok cmd/podman/varlink/iopodman.go
varlink_api_generate: .gopathok API.md
easyjson_generate: .gopathok libpod/container_easyjson.go libpod/pod_easyjson.go
libpod/container_easyjson.go: libpod/container.go
rm -f libpod/container_easyjson.go
cd "$(GOPKGDIR)" && easyjson -build_tags "$(BUILDTAGS)" ./libpod/container.go
libpod/pod_easyjson.go: libpod/pod.go
rm -f libpod/pod_easyjson.go
cd "$(GOPKGDIR)" && easyjson -build_tags "$(BUILDTAGS)" ./libpod/pod.go
.PHONY: install.libseccomp.sudo
install.libseccomp.sudo:
rm -rf ../../seccomp/libseccomp
git clone https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp ../../seccomp/libseccomp
cd ../../seccomp/libseccomp && git checkout $(LIBSECCOMP_COMMIT) && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --prefix=/usr && make all && make install
cmd/podman/varlink/iopodman.go: cmd/podman/varlink/io.podman.varlink
$(GO) generate ./cmd/podman/varlink/...
API.md: cmd/podman/varlink/io.podman.varlink
$(GO) generate ./docs/...
validate: gofmt .gitvalidation
.PHONY: \
Makefile: Respect GOBIN And use 'go env GOBIN' to detect the user's existing preference. From [1]: > The bin directory holds compiled commands. Each command is named > for its source directory, but only the final element, not the entire > path. That is, the command with source in DIR/src/foo/quux is > installed into DIR/bin/quux, not DIR/bin/foo/quux. The "foo/" > prefix is stripped so that you can add DIR/bin to your PATH to get > at the installed commands. If the GOBIN environment variable is > set, commands are installed to the directory it names instead of > DIR/bin. GOBIN must be an absolute path. > ... > Go searches each directory listed in GOPATH to find source code, but > new packages are always downloaded into the first directory in the > list. So if GOBIN is set, it will be non-empty, and we can use $(GOBIN)/... If GOBIN is unset, 'go env GOBIN' will return an empty string (as it does on Travis [2]). In that case, I'm assuming that the package in question is in the first directory in GOPATH and using the new FIRST_GOPATH (firstword and subst are documented in [3]). That's probably fairly safe, since our previous GOPATH handling assumed it only contained a single path, and nobody was complaining about that. Using ?= allows us to skip the 'dirname' call if we end up not needing GOPKGBASEDIR [4] (e.g. for the 'help' target). The recursive expansion could cause an issue if the result of the shell expansions included a '$', but those seem unlikely in GOPKGBASEDIR, GOMD2MAN, or the manpage paths. I haven't used ?= for GOBIN, because we'll always need the expanded value for the if check. Using GOMD2MAN allows us to collapse old ||-based recipe into a less confusing invocation. And using a static pattern rule [5] for $(MANPAGES) lets us write a single rule to handle both section 1 and section 5. While I was updating the GOPATH handling, I moved .gopathok from the possibly-shared $(GOPATH)/.gopathok to the definitely-specific-to-this-project .gopathok. That may cause some issues if you rebuild after changing your GOPATH without calling 'clean', but I don't expect folks to change their GOPATH frequently. And the old approach would fail if different consumers were also using the same flag path to mean something else (as CRI-O does [6]). As part of cleaning up .gopathok, I've also collapsed clean's rm calls into a single invocation. That will give us the same results with less process setup/teardown penalties. [1]: https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-GOPATH_environment_variable [2]: https://travis-ci.org/projectatomic/libpod/jobs/379345071#L459 [3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Text-Functions.html [4]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Setting.html [5]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Static-Usage.html [6]: https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-o/blob/v1.10.1/Makefile#L62 Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us> Closes: #774 Approved by: mheon
2018-05-15 17:50:56 +00:00
.gopathok \
binaries \
clean \
default \
docs \
gofmt \
help \
install \
lint \
pause \
uninstall \
shell \
changelog \
validate \
install.libseccomp.sudo \
python \
clientintegration